Yüksek Hızlı İHA’nın Gövde Hacim Artışı Nedeniyle Sürükleme Kuvvetinin Artışının Tahmininde Pratik Bir Yaklaşım

Abstract

Yüksek hızlı insansız hava araçları havacılıkta birçok amaç için kullanılmaktadır. Hızlı uçaklar sadece süpersonik hızda uçmazlar, aynı zamanda süpersonik altı uçuş performansı da önemlidir. Uçak tasarımı, birçok disiplinin birlikte çalıştığı iteratif bir süreçtir. Tasarım süreci, farklı disiplinlerin müzakeresiyle güncellenir. İç tasarım sürecinde gövde hacminde bir artış talebi olabilir. Hacim artışı, gövdenin uzatılması veya genişletilmesiyle elde edilebilir. Merkezi gövde hacmindeki bir artış, sürüklemede kuvvetinde bir artışa neden olur. Bu çalışmanın amacı, merkezi gövdenin uzatılması veya genişletilmesinin sürükleme kuvveti üzerindeki etkisini pratik bir şekilde öngörmektir. MATLAB ve DATCOM yazılımları kullanılarak oluşturulan bir yapı ile bu durum incelenmiştir. Süpersonik ve süpersonik altı rejimlerde elde edilen sonuçlar ayrı ayrı formalize edilmiş ve karşılaştırılmıştır. Aynı hacim artışının süpersonik ve süpersonik altı rejimlerde sağlanması durumunda, uçağın merkezi gövdesinin uzatılmasının genişlemeye kıyasla daha az sürükleme kuvvetine neden olduğu gösterilmiştir.

Keywords

• Sürükleme kuvveti kestirimi
• Digital DATCOM
• yüksek hızlı İHA.

A Practical Approach for Estimating Drag Increase due to Volume Increase in the Center Body of a High-Speed UAV

Abstract

High-speed unmanned aerial vehicles are used for many purposes in aviation. High-speed aircraft do not only fly at supersonic speed, but their subsonic flight performance is also important. Aircraft design is an iterative process in which many disciplines work together. The design process is updated by the negotiation of different disciplines. There may be a demand for a body volume increase in the interior design process. The increase in volume can be achieved by the elongation or expansion of the body. A volume increase in the center body causes an increase in drag. The aim of this study is to predict the effect of the elongation or expansion of the center body on drag in a practical way. It is investigated using a structure proposed with MATLAB and DATCOM. The results in both subsonic and supersonic regimes are formalized separately and compared. It is shown that in case of providing the same volume increase in both subsonic and supersonic regimes, the elongation of the aircraft center body causes less drag compared to widening.

Keywords

• Drag estimation
• Digital DATCOM
• high-speed UAV

References

1. Wu H, Gao M, Song X, Xu J, Wang Y, Zhao J. Accuracy Analysis of Aerodynamic Calculation of 2-Dimensional Trajectory Correction Projectile Based on DATCOM. Curr Eng Lett Rev 2019; 27 (4).
2. Sun D, Wu H, Zhu R, Hung LC. Development of Micro Air Vehicle Based on Aerodynamic Modeling Analysis in Tunnel Tests. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; Barcelona, Spain, 2005, pp. 2235-2240.
3. Haque AU, Asrar W, Omar AA, Sulaiman E, Ali MJS. Preliminary Aerodynamic and Static Stability Analysis for Hybrid Buoyant Aerial Vehicles at Low Speeds Using Digital DATCOM. Can Aeronaut Space J 2015; 61 (3).
4. Sahu J. Time-Accurate Aerodynamic Modeling of Synthetic Jets for Projectile Control. In: 2004 Users Group Conference (DOD UGC'04), Williamsburg, VA, USA, 2004. pp. 144–150.
5. Ahmad M, Hussain ZL, Shah SIA, Shams TA. Estimation of Stability Parameters for Wide Body Aircraft Using Computational Techniques. Appl Sci-Basel 2021; 11 (5), 2087.
6. Anderson, J. D. Computational Fluid Dynamics. McGraw-Hill Professional: New York, NY, 1995.
7. Melin T. User’s Guide and Reference Manual for Tornado. Royal Inst of Technology KTH: Stockholm, Sweden, 2000.
8. Sooy TJ, Schmidt RZ. Aerodynamic Predictions, Comparisons, and Validations Using Missile DATCOM (97) and Aeroprediction 98 (AP98). J Spacecr Rockets 2005; 42 (2), 257–265.

9. Zhang W, Wang Y, Liu Y. Aerodynamic Study of Theater Ballistic Missile Target, Aerosp Sci Technol 2013; 24 (1), 221–225.
10. Grasmeyer J. Stability and Control Derivative Estimation and Engine-Out Analysis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA, 1998.
11. Anton N, Botez R, Popescu D. New Methodologies for Aircraft Stability Derivatives Determination from its Geometrical Data. In: AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Reston, Virginia, 2009.
12. Maurice AF. Aerodynamic Performance Predictions of a SA-2 Missile Using Missile DATCOM. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Florida, 2009.
13. Blake WB. Missile DATCOM: 1997 Status and Fluent Plans. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 1997, AIAA-97-2280, 538–548.
14. Nguyen NV, Kim WS, Lee JW, Byun YH. Validations, Prediction, and Aerodynamic Optimization of Short and Medium Range Missile Configurations. In: KSAS-JSASS Joint International Symposium 2008, 146–152.
15. Shistik E, Sigal A. The Interaction between Canards and Thick Bodies: Implementation in the Missile Datcom Code. In 20th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Reston, Virginia, 2012.
16. Nicolosi F, Vecchia PD, Ciliberti D. An Investigation on Vertical Tailplane Contribution to Aircraft Sideforce. Aerosp Sci Technol 2013; 28 (1), 401–416.
17. Bakar MRA, Basuno B, Hasan S. Aerodynamics Analysis on Unsymmetrical Fuselage Models. Applied Mechanics and Materials 2013; 315, 273–277.
18. Li T, Yan P, Jiang RM, Zhou J. Calculation and Analysis of High-Speed Missile’s Aerodynamic Characteristic with Asymmetric Morphing Wings. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering 2017; 2017, 51–56.
19. Zhang GP, Duan ZY, Liao ZZ, Zhang Y. Multi-Body Dynamics of Tactical Missile with Morphing Wing. Journal of Projectile, Rockets, Missile and Guidance 2011; 31, 149–151, 158.
20. Wei DH, Chen WC, Li NY, Xu P. Morphing Theory and Control Approaches of a Morphing Missile. Tactical Missile Technology 2016; 2, 10–15.
21. Zheng MM. Modeling and Flight Control of the Variable-Sweep Aircraft in the Whole Morphing. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics the Graduate School, 2015.
22. Guo SJ. Research on Cooperative Control of the Morphing Aircraft. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics the Graduate School College of Automation Engineering, 2012.
23. Yan X, Zhu J, Kuang M, Wang X. Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using a Novel Optimizer Based on Machine Learning Techniques. Aerosp Sci Technol 2019; 86, 826–835.
24. Nahon M. Determination of Undersea Vehicle Hydrodynamic Derivatives Using the USAF Datcom. In: Proceedings of OCEANS '93, Victoria, BC, Canada, 1993.
25. Rauf A, Zafar MA, Ashraf Z, Akhtar H. Aerodynamic Modeling and State-Space Model Extraction of a UAV Using DATCOM and Simulink. In: 2011 3rd International Conference on Computer Research and Development, Shanghai, China, 2011.
26. Triputra FR, Trilaksono BR, Sasongko RA, Dahsyat M. Longitudinal Dynamic System Modeling of a Fixed-Wing UAV towards Autonomous Flight Control System Development: A Case Study of BPPT Wulung UAV Platform. In 2012 International Conference on System Engineering and Technology (ICSET), Bandung, Indonesia, 2012, pp. 1-6.
27. Jamil MA, Ahsan M, Ahsan MJ, Choudhry MA. Time Domain System Identification of Longitudinal Dynamics of a UAV: A Grey Box Approach. In: 2015 International Conference on Emerging Technologies (ICET), Peshawar, Pakistan, 2015, pp. 1-6.
28. Bashir M, Khan SA, Udayagiri L, Noor A. Dynamic Stability of Unguided Projectile with 6-DOF Trajectory Modeling. In: 2017 2nd International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT), Mumbai, India, 2017, pp. 1002-1009.
29. Jeevan HL, Narahari HK, Sriram AT. Development of Pitch Control Subsystem of Autopilot for a Fixed Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. In: 2018 2nd International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control (ICISC), Coimbatore, India, 2018, pp. 1233-1238.
30. Yang J, Wen L, Jiang B, Wang Z. Dynamic Modeling and Flight Simulation of a Folding Wing-Tip UAV. In: 2020 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), Hefei, China, 2020, pp. 1814-1819.
31. Turevskiy A, Gage S, Buhr C. Model-Based Design of a New Light-Weight Aircraft. In: AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Reston, Virginia, 2007.
32. Anton N, Popescu D, Botez RM. Estimation of Stability Derivatives from Aircraft Geometrical Data for Use in Simulator Applications, Conference: American Romanian Academy ARAAt: Boston, MI, USA, 2007.
33. Raymer DP. Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach; American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics: Reston, VA, 2012.