Against Digital Extinction: Cyber Peace

Abstract

At a time when cyberattacks are becoming a part of our daily lives and small-scale attacks are becoming commonplace, it is obvious that digital infrastructures are widely and intensely used in our lives and that they can be used for hostile, non-peaceful purposes. This situation has become very serious especially for Turkey, due to the complex attacks taking place around the World. The issue of cybersecurity around the world is not limited to certain cyberattacks but also brings the threat of these attacks turning into comprehensive cyber warfare. Therefore, the more important the security of the geographical borders, the more important the security of electronic systems and the data stored there. Since the most important component of security is peace, it is worth examining as a very important concept in Cyber Peace in response to the negative perceptions of cyberwar, cyber terrorism and cybercrime. This study, it is aimed to create a conceptual basis of cyber peace and contribute to this field to create a defense mechanism based on peaceful behaviors in cyberspace. For this purpose, the definition of cyber peace has been made, and it has been focused on establishing and protecting cyber peace. It was emphasized that cyber peace can be sustainable not through disarmament, but by reducing the risk through modernization of attack and defense capacities. In this study, which we do not have much work on cyber peace and we can accept it as the first step in filling this gap; It was concluded that private and voluntary organizations must take a more active role in protecting cyber peace.

Keywords

• Peace
• Cyber Peace
• Cyber Peace Protection
• Cyber.

References

1. [1] Hamadoun, I. T. The Quest For Cyber Confidence, 77, 2011.
2. [2] Inversini, R. Cyber Peace: And How It Can Be Achieved, The Ethics of Cybersecurity, Christen, M., Gordijn, B. ve Loi, M. (Ed.), 259-276, 2020.
3. [3] Shackelford, S. J. Managing Cyber Attacks in International Law, Business, and Relations: In Search of Cyber Peace. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
4. [4] Çakır, M. N. Siber Güvenlik İnisiyatifleri ve Sivil Toplum, 2019. https://www.sivilsayfalar.org/tag/siber-baris-enstitusu/
5. [5] Bloom. L. Savag, J. E. On Cyber Peace. Atlantic Council, 2011.
6. [6] Akatyev, N. Cyber Peacekeeping, Digital Forensics and Cyber Crime, 126-139, 2015.
7. [7] Lynn III, W. J. Defending a new domain: the pentagon's cyber strategy. External Affairs, 89, 97–108, 2010.
8. [8] Bellamy, A. and Williams, P. Understanding Peacekeeping. Polity, 2010.

9. [9] Cahill, TP, Rozinov, K., Katır, C .: Cyber Warfare Peacekeeping, s. 100. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Workshop on Information Assurance, 2003.
10. [10] Kleffner, JK, Dinnis, H.H. A. Cyber peacekeeping: international legal aspects of cyber activity in peacekeeping operations. International Law Studies. 89, 1, 2013.
11. [11] Keskin, Ş. Realizm Ve Liberalizm Işiğinda Siber Savaş Ve Alternatif Bir Kavram Olarak Siber Bariş'in Değerlendirilmesi, TURAN-SAM Uluslararası bilimsel dergisi, 9(35), 287-297, 2017.
12. [12] United Nations, United Nations Peacekeeping Operations: Capstone Doctrine.January 2008.
13. [13] Robinson, M. Jones, K. Janicke, H and Maglaras, L. An Introduction to Cyber Peacekeeping, Senior Member, IEEE, 2017.
14. [14] Mays, T. Historical Dictionary of Multinational Peacekeeping. Scarecrow Press, 2010