EFFECTS OF BIAS, GAMIFICATION AND MONETARY COMPENSATION ON MOOC DROPOUTS

Manuel Medına-labrador; Gustavo Rene Garcıa-vargas; Fernando Marroquın-cıendua

doi:10.17718/tojde.1188166

EN

EFFECTS OF BIAS, GAMIFICATION AND MONETARY COMPENSATION ON MOOC DROPOUTS

Abstract

The dropout rate is the most significant disadvantage in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC); most of the time, it exceeds 90%. This research compares the effect of cognitive bias, gamification, monetary compensation, and student characteristics (gender, age, years of education, student geographical location, and interest in the course certificate) on dropout. We use survival analysis to identify the predictors of dropout and its related factors. The results showed the lowest dropout (74.2%) for cognitive bias and gamification. The results showed that the Peanut effect bias favors the lowest risk of drop up. Likewise, the findings showed the interest in the final certificate as a predictor of retention to complete a four-week MOOC.

Keywords

MOOC, gamification, choice bias, monetary compensation, Peanut Effect

Supporting Institution

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana- Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano

Thanks

Pontifica Universidad Javeriana- Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano

References

Adamopoulos, P. (2013, December). What Makes a Great MOOC? An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Student Retention in Online Courses. In Kerr (Presidencia). Thirty Fourth International Conference on Information Systems, 1–21.Milan, Italy. Retrieved from http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~padamopo/What%20makes%20a%20great%20MOOC.pdf
An, Y., Zhu, M., Bonk, C. J., & Lin, L. (2021). Exploring instructors’ perspectives, practices, and perceived support needs and barriers related to the gamification of MOOCs. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33, 64-84.
Aparicio, M., Oliveira, T., Bacao, F., & Painho, M. (2019). Gamification: A key determinant of massive open online course (mooc) success. Information & Management, 56(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.im.2018.06.003
Carey, K. (2012). Into the future with MOOCs. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 59(2),29. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/Into-the-Future-With-MOOCs/134080
Chang, J. W., & Wei, H. Y. (2016). Exploring Engaging Gamification Mechanics in Massive Online Open Courses. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 177-203. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ef01/ff537aa010df51aea60733cab6a6a55399ee.pdf
Chen, C., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Malan, D. J. (2020). Computational thinking and assignment resubmission predict persistence in a computer science MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(5), 581-594.
Chyung, S. Y. (2004, Junio). Hoping to reduce attrition? Follow the SIEME model and investigate motivation-hygiene factors. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, 1-6. Madison, WI, EU. Retrieved from https://opwl.boisestate.edu/faculty-staff/faculty/yonnie-chyung/
Collazos, C., Gonzalez, C., & García, R. (2010, June). Computer supported collaborative: CSCM. 2014 Workshop on Interaction Design in Educational Environments, 28. Madrid, España. Retrieved from http://rehab-workshop.org/IDEEpapers/idee2014_submission_17.pdf
De Notaris, D., Canazza, S., Mariconda, C., & Paulon, C. (2021). How to play a MOOC: Practices and simulation. Entertainment Computing, 37, 100395.
Ferschke, O., Yang, D., Tomar, G., & Rosé, C. P. (2015, June). Positive impact of collaborative chat participation in an edX MOOC. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, (pp. 115-124). Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_12

Furse, D., Punj. G., & Stewart, D. (1984). A typology of individual search strategies among purchasers of new automobiles. Journal Consumer Research, 10(4), 417-43. doi: 10.1086/208980
Gené, O. B., Núñez, M. M., & Blanco, Á. F. (2014, October). Gamification in MOOC: Challenges, Opportunities and Proposals for Advancing MOOC Model. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, (pp. 215-220). New York, EU.doi: 10.1145/2669711.2669902
Goopio, J., & Cheung, C. (2020). The MOOC dropout phenomenon and retention strategies. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 1–21. doi:10.1080/15313220.2020.1809050 Greene, JA, Oswald, CA, y Pomerantz, J. (2015). Predictors of Retention and Achievement in a Massive Open Online Course. American Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 925-955. doi: 10.3102/0002831215584621
Gütl, C., Chang, V., Hernández Rizzardini, R., & Morales, M. (2014, December). Must we be concerned with the Massive Drop-outs in MOOC? - An Attrition Analysis of Open Courses. International Conference of Interactive Collaborative Learning, ICL2014. (pp. 1-8). Dubai, Arab Emirates . Retrieved from http://www.mooc-maker.org/wp- content/files/WPD1.6_INGLES.pdf
Gütl, C., Rizzardini, R. H., Chang, V., & Morales, M. (2014, September). Attrition in MOOC: Lessons Learned from Drop-Out Students. Learning Technology for Education in Cloud-MOOC and Big Data: Third International Workshop, 37–48. Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3- 319-10671-7_4
Gupta, P., & Vaibhav, A. (2014, December). Gamification of MOOCs for increasing user engagement. 2014 IEEE international conference on MOOC, innovation and technology in education, (pp. 290-295). Patiala, India. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anant_Vaibhav/publication/271647254_Gamification_of_MOOCs_for_Increasing_User_Engagement/links/5518eaaf0cf2d70ee27b7588.pdf
Jordan, K. (2015). Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 341-358.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, New Series, 211 (4481), 453-458. doi: 0.1126/science.7455683
Kahneman, D. (2003). Mapas de racionalidad limitada: Psicología para una economía conductual. Revista Asturiana de Economía, 28(5), 182-225.
Krause, M., Mogalle, M., Pohl, H., & Williams, J. J. (2015). A playful game changer: Fostering student retention in online education with social gamification. Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning@Scale (pp.95–102).
Kullgren, J., Troxel, A., Loewenstein, G, Asch, D., Norton, L., Wesby, L, Tao, Y., Zhu, J., & Volpp, k. (2013). Individual vs. Group-Based Incentives for Weight Loss: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Ann intern Med., 158(7), 505-514. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-7-201304020-00002.
Loewenstein, G., John, L., & Volpp, K. G (2013). Using Decision Errors to Help People Help Themselves. Chap. 21 in The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy, edited by Eldar Shafir, (pp 361–379). USA: Princeton University Press, 2012.
Medina-Labrador, M., Vargas, G. R. G., Alvarado, J., & Caicedo, M. (2019). Survival and risk analysis in MOOCS. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(4), 149-159. doi: 10.17718/tojde.640561
Medina Labrador, M., & García Vargas, G. (2020). Los sesgos de elección al rescate de la retención en los MOOCs. Profesorado, 24(3), 423-439. doi: 10.30827/profesorado.v24i3.8274
Ortega-Arranz, A., Er, E., Martínez-Monés, A., Bote-Lorenzo, M. L., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., & Muñoz- Cristóbal, J. A. (2019). Understanding student behavior and perceptions toward earning badges in a gamified mooc. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18(3), 533–549. doi: 10. 1007/s10209-019-00677-8
Park, J. H. (2007, June). Factors Related to Learner Dropout in Online Learning. In Gilley (Presidencia). The 2007 Academy of Human Resource Development Annual Conference, 25(1), 1–8. Indianapolis, EU. doi:/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.100
Rincón-Flores, E. G., Mena, J., & Montoya, M. S. R. (2020). Gamification: a new key for enhancing engagement in MOOCs on energy? International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14(4), 1379-1393.
Romero-Rodríguez, L. M., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., & González, J. R. V. (2019). Gamification in MOOCs: Engagement application test in energy sustainability courses. IEEE Access, 7, (pp. 32093–32101). doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2903230
Rovai, A. P. (2003). In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. Internet and Higher Education, 6 (1),1-16. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00158-6
Sailer, M., Hense, J., Mandl, H., & Klevers, M. (2013). Psychological perspectives on motivation through gamification. IxD&A, 19, 28-37. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/26951671.pdf
Shimizu, K., & Udagawa, D. (2018). Is human life worth peanuts? Risk attitude changes in accordance with varying stakes. PloS one, 13(8), e0201547. Doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0201547
Stoolmiller, M. (2016). An introduction to using multivariate multilevel survival analysis to study coercive family process. En T.J. Dishion y J. Snyder (Eds). The Oxford handbook of coercive relationship dynamics, 363-377. New York, EU. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199324552.013.27
Sureephong, P., Dahlan, W., Chernbumroong, S., & Tongpaeng, Y. (2020). The Effect of Non-Monetary Rewards on Employee Performance in Massive Open Online Courses. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(1).
Thaler, R. & Benartzi, S. (2004). Save More Tomorrow : Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112(1), 164-187. doi: 10.1086/380085
Xie, Z. (2019). Modelling the dropout patterns of MOOC learners. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 25(3), 313-324.
Yang, D., Wen, M., Howley, I., Kraut, R., & Rose, C. (2015, March). Exploring the effect of confusion in discussion forums. In Wolf (Presidencia). Proceedings of the second (2015) ACM conference on learning@scale,(pp. 121-130). Vancouver, Canada. doi: 10.1145/2724660.2724677

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Lifelong learning

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Manuel Medına-labrador ^*
0000-0001-6781-9481
Colombia

Gustavo Rene Garcıa-vargas
0000-0002-1035-9194
Colombia

Fernando Marroquın-cıendua ^*
0000-0002-2213-4566
Colombia

Publication Date

October 1, 2023

Submission Date

October 13, 2022

Acceptance Date

January 10, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 24 Number: 4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1188166

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA46YT98HZ

APA

Medına-labrador, M., Garcıa-vargas, G. R., & Marroquın-cıendua, F. (2023). EFFECTS OF BIAS, GAMIFICATION AND MONETARY COMPENSATION ON MOOC DROPOUTS. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(4), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1188166

AMA

1.Medına-labrador M, Garcıa-vargas GR, Marroquın-cıendua F. EFFECTS OF BIAS, GAMIFICATION AND MONETARY COMPENSATION ON MOOC DROPOUTS. TOJDE. 2023;24(4):40-49. doi:10.17718/tojde.1188166

Chicago

Medına-labrador, Manuel, Gustavo Rene Garcıa-vargas, and Fernando Marroquın-cıendua. 2023. “EFFECTS OF BIAS, GAMIFICATION AND MONETARY COMPENSATION ON MOOC DROPOUTS”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 24 (4): 40-49. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1188166.

EndNote

Medına-labrador M, Garcıa-vargas GR, Marroquın-cıendua F (October 1, 2023) EFFECTS OF BIAS, GAMIFICATION AND MONETARY COMPENSATION ON MOOC DROPOUTS. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 24 4 40–49.

IEEE

[1]M. Medına-labrador, G. R. Garcıa-vargas, and F. Marroquın-cıendua, “EFFECTS OF BIAS, GAMIFICATION AND MONETARY COMPENSATION ON MOOC DROPOUTS”, TOJDE, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 40–49, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.17718/tojde.1188166.

ISNAD

Medına-labrador, Manuel - Garcıa-vargas, Gustavo Rene - Marroquın-cıendua, Fernando. “EFFECTS OF BIAS, GAMIFICATION AND MONETARY COMPENSATION ON MOOC DROPOUTS”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 24/4 (October 1, 2023): 40-49. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1188166.

JAMA

1.Medına-labrador M, Garcıa-vargas GR, Marroquın-cıendua F. EFFECTS OF BIAS, GAMIFICATION AND MONETARY COMPENSATION ON MOOC DROPOUTS. TOJDE. 2023;24:40–49.

MLA

Medına-labrador, Manuel, et al. “EFFECTS OF BIAS, GAMIFICATION AND MONETARY COMPENSATION ON MOOC DROPOUTS”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 24, no. 4, Oct. 2023, pp. 40-49, doi:10.17718/tojde.1188166.

Vancouver

1.Manuel Medına-labrador, Gustavo Rene Garcıa-vargas, Fernando Marroquın-cıendua. EFFECTS OF BIAS, GAMIFICATION AND MONETARY COMPENSATION ON MOOC DROPOUTS. TOJDE. 2023 Oct. 1;24(4):40-9. doi:10.17718/tojde.1188166

Cited By

El autoaprendizaje aplicado a las asignaturas de tecnología audiovisual. Estudio de caso

Texto Livre

https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-3652.2024.51273

MOOCs and economic disadvantage: A path analysis of 3.5 million MITx learners

Innovations in Education and Teaching International

https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2025.2471410