Research Article

ASSESSMENT OF SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION FROM STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE

Volume: 24 Number: 4 October 1, 2023
EN

ASSESSMENT OF SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION FROM STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE

Abstract

This research aims to identify and investigate different dimensions and underlying factors influencing the successful implementation of e-Learning, from participants’ viewpoint, i.e. architecture students. To examine the constituents of an effective e-Learning experience in education, evaluation themes were formulated as overall substitutability level, cognitive performance, social interaction and engagement, student comprehension and comfort, personal preference, and learners’ satisfaction. Through literature survey and review of mostly referred factors affecting e-Learning efficiency, four dimensions were designated for further elaboration in this study: (i) course characteristics, (ii) participant characteristics, (iii) e-Learning environment, and (iv) prior acquaintance, with each category including several sub-measures. Survey method was employed and a questionnaire was administered to 122 architecture students at both undergraduate and graduate levels to investigate participant perspectives in reference to particular synchronous lectures delivered online. Out of ten potential influencing factors hypothesized, seven were verified to be critical determinants of e-Learning effectiveness in architectural education.

Keywords

architectural education, distance education, e-Learning, statistical analysis, students’ satisfaction

References

  1. Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
  2. Altıntaş Kaptan, M., Edis, E., & Ünlü, A. (2021). Challenges in Synchronous e-Learning in Architectural Education. In: Cordan, Ö., Dinçay, D.A., Yurdakul Toker, Ç., Öksüz, E.B., Semizoğlu, S. (eds). Game + Design Education. Springer Series in Design and Innovation, vol 13. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65060-5_32
  3. Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A. P. (2012). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843-855. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010
  4. Bolliger, D. U., & Martindale, T. (2004). Key Factors for Determining Student Satisfaction in Online Courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 61-67.
  5. Cai, Z., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2017). Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 105, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.003
  6. Dimock, M. (2019) Defining generations: Where millennials end and generation Z begins, Pew Research Center. Pew Research Center. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/ (Accessed: February 21, 2023).
  7. Dong, J. Q., & Zhang, X. (2011). Gender differences in adoption of information systems: New findings from China. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 384–390. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.017
  8. Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The Determinants of Students’ Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in University Online Education: An Empirical Investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00114.x
  9. Frimpon, M. F. (2012). A Re-Structuring of the Critical Success Factors for E-Learning Deployment. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(3), 115-127.
  10. Johnson, J. L. (2003). Distance Education: The Complete Guide to Design, Delivery, and Improvement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
APA
Altıntas Kaptan, M., Edıs, E., & Unlu, A. (2023). ASSESSMENT OF SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION FROM STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(4), 50-76. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1213077
AMA
1.Altıntas Kaptan M, Edıs E, Unlu A. ASSESSMENT OF SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION FROM STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE. TOJDE. 2023;24(4):50-76. doi:10.17718/tojde.1213077
Chicago
Altıntas Kaptan, Meric, Ecem Edıs, and Aslıhan Unlu. 2023. “ASSESSMENT OF SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION FROM STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 24 (4): 50-76. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1213077.
EndNote
Altıntas Kaptan M, Edıs E, Unlu A (October 1, 2023) ASSESSMENT OF SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION FROM STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 24 4 50–76.
IEEE
[1]M. Altıntas Kaptan, E. Edıs, and A. Unlu, “ASSESSMENT OF SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION FROM STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE”, TOJDE, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 50–76, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.17718/tojde.1213077.
ISNAD
Altıntas Kaptan, Meric - Edıs, Ecem - Unlu, Aslıhan. “ASSESSMENT OF SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION FROM STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 24/4 (October 1, 2023): 50-76. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1213077.
JAMA
1.Altıntas Kaptan M, Edıs E, Unlu A. ASSESSMENT OF SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION FROM STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE. TOJDE. 2023;24:50–76.
MLA
Altıntas Kaptan, Meric, et al. “ASSESSMENT OF SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION FROM STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 24, no. 4, Oct. 2023, pp. 50-76, doi:10.17718/tojde.1213077.
Vancouver
1.Meric Altıntas Kaptan, Ecem Edıs, Aslıhan Unlu. ASSESSMENT OF SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION FROM STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE. TOJDE. 2023 Oct. 1;24(4):50-76. doi:10.17718/tojde.1213077