Research Article

DIGITAL MULTIMODAL COMPOSING VS. MOOC-BASED INSTRUCTION: EFFECTS ON IELTS CANDIDATES’ SPEAKING FLUENCY AND COHERENCE

Volume: 26 Number: 4 October 1, 2025
Fahimeh Talakoob , Hossein Heidari Tabrizi *, Sajad Shafiee

DIGITAL MULTIMODAL COMPOSING VS. MOOC-BASED INSTRUCTION: EFFECTS ON IELTS CANDIDATES’ SPEAKING FLUENCY AND COHERENCE

Abstract

Over the past decades, language teachers have utilized the advantages of technology in the language classroom, yet given the explosion of technological tools and applications in recent years, there is no consensus as to which technological advancement best serves the development of which language skills or components. The current investigation was designed to examine the potential impacts of digital multimodal composing (DMC) and massive online open courses (MOOC) on the speaking fluency and coherence of Iranian intermediate IELTS candidates. To this end, a pretest-treatment-posttest, quasi-experimental design was utilized and a sample of 93 male/female EFL learners at the intermediate level were selected based on volunteer sampling procedures. Subsequently, the participants were assigned to the three groups of DMC, MOOC, and control group (CG). The three groups were exposed to the same instructional materials, with the difference being that in DMC, the learners had to produce videos during the course and post them on the Flip platform for their peers and teacher to review and comment. They then could use the feedback to make corrections/revisions; in the MOOC condition, the learners signed up for the course on futurelearn. com and received video presentations, pdf articles, and quizzes, and they were made to leave comments or react to each other’s’ comments during the course. In the CG, the materials were presented in print and through powerpoint slides by the teacher. Comparisons of the speaking posttest scores of the learners in the three groups revealed that with regard to fluency and coherence, DMC learners significantly outperformed MOOC learners, who were in turn better than the CG learners. Based on these findings, this study presents a discussion of certain pedagogical implications.

Keywords

Coherence, DMC, Fluency, IELTS, MOOC, Speaking

References

  1. Alanazi, H., & Walker-Gleaves, C. (2019). Investigating student attitudes towards using Hybrid MOOCs in the higher education of Saudi Arabia. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), 10(1), 3140- 3146.
  2. Albino, G. (2017). Improving speaking fluency in a task-based language teaching approach: The case of EFL learners at PUNIV-Cazenga. Sage Open, DOI: 10.1177/2158244017691077
  3. Alharbi, H. (2015). Improving students’ English speaking proficiency in Saudi public schools. International Journal of Instruction, 8(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2015.818a
  4. Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), Retrieved 2 March, 2021, from, http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/890/1663
  5. Chacon-Beltran, R. (2017). The role of MOOCs in the learning of languages: Lessons from a beginners’ English course. Porta Linguarum, 28, 23-35.
APA
Talakoob, F., Tabrizi, H. H., & Shafiee, S. (2025). DIGITAL MULTIMODAL COMPOSING VS. MOOC-BASED INSTRUCTION: EFFECTS ON IELTS CANDIDATES’ SPEAKING FLUENCY AND COHERENCE. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 26(4), 222-239. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1609742
AMA
1.Talakoob F, Tabrizi HH, Shafiee S. DIGITAL MULTIMODAL COMPOSING VS. MOOC-BASED INSTRUCTION: EFFECTS ON IELTS CANDIDATES’ SPEAKING FLUENCY AND COHERENCE. TOJDE. 2025;26(4):222-239. doi:10.17718/tojde.1609742
Chicago
Talakoob, Fahimeh, Hossein Heidari Tabrizi, and Sajad Shafiee. 2025. “DIGITAL MULTIMODAL COMPOSING VS. MOOC-BASED INSTRUCTION: EFFECTS ON IELTS CANDIDATES’ SPEAKING FLUENCY AND COHERENCE”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 26 (4): 222-39. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1609742.
EndNote
Talakoob F, Tabrizi HH, Shafiee S (October 1, 2025) DIGITAL MULTIMODAL COMPOSING VS. MOOC-BASED INSTRUCTION: EFFECTS ON IELTS CANDIDATES’ SPEAKING FLUENCY AND COHERENCE. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 26 4 222–239.
IEEE
[1]F. Talakoob, H. H. Tabrizi, and S. Shafiee, “DIGITAL MULTIMODAL COMPOSING VS. MOOC-BASED INSTRUCTION: EFFECTS ON IELTS CANDIDATES’ SPEAKING FLUENCY AND COHERENCE”, TOJDE, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 222–239, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.17718/tojde.1609742.
ISNAD
Talakoob, Fahimeh - Tabrizi, Hossein Heidari - Shafiee, Sajad. “DIGITAL MULTIMODAL COMPOSING VS. MOOC-BASED INSTRUCTION: EFFECTS ON IELTS CANDIDATES’ SPEAKING FLUENCY AND COHERENCE”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 26/4 (October 1, 2025): 222-239. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1609742.
JAMA
1.Talakoob F, Tabrizi HH, Shafiee S. DIGITAL MULTIMODAL COMPOSING VS. MOOC-BASED INSTRUCTION: EFFECTS ON IELTS CANDIDATES’ SPEAKING FLUENCY AND COHERENCE. TOJDE. 2025;26:222–239.
MLA
Talakoob, Fahimeh, et al. “DIGITAL MULTIMODAL COMPOSING VS. MOOC-BASED INSTRUCTION: EFFECTS ON IELTS CANDIDATES’ SPEAKING FLUENCY AND COHERENCE”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 26, no. 4, Oct. 2025, pp. 222-39, doi:10.17718/tojde.1609742.
Vancouver
1.Fahimeh Talakoob, Hossein Heidari Tabrizi, Sajad Shafiee. DIGITAL MULTIMODAL COMPOSING VS. MOOC-BASED INSTRUCTION: EFFECTS ON IELTS CANDIDATES’ SPEAKING FLUENCY AND COHERENCE. TOJDE. 2025 Oct. 1;26(4):222-39. doi:10.17718/tojde.1609742