Research Article

GENERATIVE AI ADOPTION AMONG LECTURERS IN HIGHER EDUCATON: A REFINED DOI–TTF FRAMEWORK INCORPORATING SOCIAL AND COGNITIVE DYNAMICS

Volume: 27 Number: 3 July 1, 2026

GENERATIVE AI ADOPTION AMONG LECTURERS IN HIGHER EDUCATON: A REFINED DOI–TTF FRAMEWORK INCORPORATING SOCIAL AND COGNITIVE DYNAMICS

Abstract

This study develops a refined theoretical model to explain lecturers’ intentions to adopt generative AI in higher education. It extends the combined perspectives of the Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) and Task-Technology Fit (TTF) frameworks. The model includes technological, social, and cognitive factors that shape lecturers’ decisions when adopting new technologies. Data were collected from 246 lecturers across Indonesian universities and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results show that lecturers’ perceptions of the benefits of generative AI strongly influence their intention to adopt it. These benefits include its relative advantage and its intelligent functions. The results also show that these perceived benefits shape social expectations in academic environments. However, concerns about privacy and perceived risks weaken these social influences, reducing the likelihood of adoption. The study also finds a gender difference. Male lecturers are more influenced by social factors than female lecturers. This study contributes to theory by refining the DOI–TTF framework. It explains how technological perceptions, cognitive judgments, and social pressures work together to influence adoption decisions. This topic has received limited attention in earlier studies. The practical implications highlight the importance of peer support, clear institutional guidelines, and targeted training to promote responsible and effective adoption of AI in higher education.

Keywords

Generative AI, Higher Education, SEM, Lecturer, Adoption

Ethical Statement

The study did not involve sensitive personal data, vulnerable populations, or any medical or clinical interventions. Based on the low-risk nature of the research and in accordance with institutional guidelines, formal ethics board approval was not required. However, ethical considerations were fully addressed by obtaining informed consent from all participants through a Respondent Concern Form, which clearly explained the research purpose, voluntary participation, confidentiality, and the right to withdraw at any time. A copy of this form has also been uploaded as supporting evidence.

References

  1. Adawiyah, S. R., et al. (2024). The influence of AI and AR technology in personalized recommendations on customer usage intention: A case study of cosmetic products on Shopee. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 14(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135786
  2. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
  3. Al-kfairy, M. (2024). Factors impacting the adoption and acceptance of ChatGPT in educational settings: A narrative review of empirical studies. Applied System Innovation, 7(6), 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi7060110
  4. Almogren, A. S., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Dahri, N. A. (2024). Exploring factors influencing the acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: A smart education perspective. Heliyon, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31887
  5. Almusawi, H. A., & Durugbo, C. M. (2024). Linking task-technology fit, innovativeness, and teacher readiness using structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12440-x
APA
Usfinit, T. B., Handarkho, Y. D., & Indriasari, T. D. (2026). GENERATIVE AI ADOPTION AMONG LECTURERS IN HIGHER EDUCATON: A REFINED DOI–TTF FRAMEWORK INCORPORATING SOCIAL AND COGNITIVE DYNAMICS. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 27(3), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1715714
AMA
1.Usfinit TB, Handarkho YD, Indriasari TD. GENERATIVE AI ADOPTION AMONG LECTURERS IN HIGHER EDUCATON: A REFINED DOI–TTF FRAMEWORK INCORPORATING SOCIAL AND COGNITIVE DYNAMICS. TOJDE. 2026;27(3):25-47. doi:10.17718/tojde.1715714
Chicago
Usfinit, Tian Bita, Yonathan Dri Handarkho, and Theresia Devi Indriasari. 2026. “GENERATIVE AI ADOPTION AMONG LECTURERS IN HIGHER EDUCATON: A REFINED DOI–TTF FRAMEWORK INCORPORATING SOCIAL AND COGNITIVE DYNAMICS”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 27 (3): 25-47. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1715714.
EndNote
Usfinit TB, Handarkho YD, Indriasari TD (July 1, 2026) GENERATIVE AI ADOPTION AMONG LECTURERS IN HIGHER EDUCATON: A REFINED DOI–TTF FRAMEWORK INCORPORATING SOCIAL AND COGNITIVE DYNAMICS. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 27 3 25–47.
IEEE
[1]T. B. Usfinit, Y. D. Handarkho, and T. D. Indriasari, “GENERATIVE AI ADOPTION AMONG LECTURERS IN HIGHER EDUCATON: A REFINED DOI–TTF FRAMEWORK INCORPORATING SOCIAL AND COGNITIVE DYNAMICS”, TOJDE, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 25–47, July 2026, doi: 10.17718/tojde.1715714.
ISNAD
Usfinit, Tian Bita - Handarkho, Yonathan Dri - Indriasari, Theresia Devi. “GENERATIVE AI ADOPTION AMONG LECTURERS IN HIGHER EDUCATON: A REFINED DOI–TTF FRAMEWORK INCORPORATING SOCIAL AND COGNITIVE DYNAMICS”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 27/3 (July 1, 2026): 25-47. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1715714.
JAMA
1.Usfinit TB, Handarkho YD, Indriasari TD. GENERATIVE AI ADOPTION AMONG LECTURERS IN HIGHER EDUCATON: A REFINED DOI–TTF FRAMEWORK INCORPORATING SOCIAL AND COGNITIVE DYNAMICS. TOJDE. 2026;27:25–47.
MLA
Usfinit, Tian Bita, et al. “GENERATIVE AI ADOPTION AMONG LECTURERS IN HIGHER EDUCATON: A REFINED DOI–TTF FRAMEWORK INCORPORATING SOCIAL AND COGNITIVE DYNAMICS”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 27, no. 3, July 2026, pp. 25-47, doi:10.17718/tojde.1715714.
Vancouver
1.Tian Bita Usfinit, Yonathan Dri Handarkho, Theresia Devi Indriasari. GENERATIVE AI ADOPTION AMONG LECTURERS IN HIGHER EDUCATON: A REFINED DOI–TTF FRAMEWORK INCORPORATING SOCIAL AND COGNITIVE DYNAMICS. TOJDE. 2026 Jul. 1;27(3):25-47. doi:10.17718/tojde.1715714