A Comparative Study Of Student Satisfaction Level In Distance Learning And Live Classroom At Higher Education Level

Volume: 13 Number: 1 March 1, 2012
Azhar Mahmood , Sheikh Tariq Mahmood , Allah Bakhsh Malık
EN

A Comparative Study Of Student Satisfaction Level In Distance Learning And Live Classroom At Higher Education Level

Abstract

The technology has embraced the innovative learning methodologies. Distance Learning has taken the place of traditional face-to-face educational environment. The purpose of this study was to compare the level of student satisfaction of graduate distance learning educational psychology course to a traditional classroom educational psychology course taught by the same instructor. Population of the study consisted of Graduate students in course educational psychology during fall semester 2009. Study was descriptive in nature and findings were drawn after the descriptive analysis. Likert scale was used to determine the level of satisfaction between both groups. On the basis of findings, It was concluded that distance learning and traditional classroom students experienced a high level of satisfaction .It was determined that there was very slightly difference in the levels of student satisfaction in the distance learning and traditional classroom students.

Keywords

Distance Learning, Traditional Classroom Learning, Student Satisfaction, Instruction, Higher Education

References

  1. Bates, T. (1995). Technology: Open learning and distance education. New York: Rutledge.
  2. Blustain, Harvey, Philip Goldstein, and Gregory Lozier (1999). "Assessing the New
  3. Competitive Landscape," in Dancing with the Devil, Editors: Richard N. Katz and Associates, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco. Gallegly, T. James. (2005. Relationship of student satisfaction levels in distance learning and traditional classroom environments at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.
  4. Dissertation Abstracts, International, [Online document 200505].
  5. Galusha, J.M. (1997). Barriers to learning in distance education. Interpersonal
  6. Computing and Technology, 5(3-4). Holmberg, B. (1989). The concept, basic character, and development potentials of distance education Distance Education, 10 (1), 127-135
  7. Imel, S. (1998) Myths and realities of distance learning. Columbus, Ohio: ERIC
  8. Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. Ohio State University (Eric Document Reproduction Service No ED 414 446). Inman, E., & Kerwin, M. (1999) Instructor and student attitudes toward distance learning Community College. Journal of Research & Practice, 23 (6), 581-592
  9. Keegan, D. (1995). Distance education technology for the new millennium: compressed video teaching. ZIFF Papiere Hagen, Germany: Institute for Research into Distance
  10. Education. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No ED 389 931). Lionarakis, Antonis (2003).The quality of the learning experience: a comparative study between open distance and conventional education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 4 (2)
APA
Mahmood, A., Mahmood, S. T., & Malık, A. B. (2012). A Comparative Study Of Student Satisfaction Level In Distance Learning And Live Classroom At Higher Education Level. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 128-136. https://izlik.org/JA63DF37SK
AMA
1.Mahmood A, Mahmood ST, Malık AB. A Comparative Study Of Student Satisfaction Level In Distance Learning And Live Classroom At Higher Education Level. TOJDE. 2012;13(1):128-136. https://izlik.org/JA63DF37SK
Chicago
Mahmood, Azhar, Sheikh Tariq Mahmood, and Allah Bakhsh Malık. 2012. “A Comparative Study Of Student Satisfaction Level In Distance Learning And Live Classroom At Higher Education Level”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 13 (1): 128-36. https://izlik.org/JA63DF37SK.
EndNote
Mahmood A, Mahmood ST, Malık AB (March 1, 2012) A Comparative Study Of Student Satisfaction Level In Distance Learning And Live Classroom At Higher Education Level. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 13 1 128–136.
IEEE
[1]A. Mahmood, S. T. Mahmood, and A. B. Malık, “A Comparative Study Of Student Satisfaction Level In Distance Learning And Live Classroom At Higher Education Level”, TOJDE, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 128–136, Mar. 2012, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA63DF37SK
ISNAD
Mahmood, Azhar - Mahmood, Sheikh Tariq - Malık, Allah Bakhsh. “A Comparative Study Of Student Satisfaction Level In Distance Learning And Live Classroom At Higher Education Level”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 13/1 (March 1, 2012): 128-136. https://izlik.org/JA63DF37SK.
JAMA
1.Mahmood A, Mahmood ST, Malık AB. A Comparative Study Of Student Satisfaction Level In Distance Learning And Live Classroom At Higher Education Level. TOJDE. 2012;13:128–136.
MLA
Mahmood, Azhar, et al. “A Comparative Study Of Student Satisfaction Level In Distance Learning And Live Classroom At Higher Education Level”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 13, no. 1, Mar. 2012, pp. 128-36, https://izlik.org/JA63DF37SK.
Vancouver
1.Azhar Mahmood, Sheikh Tariq Mahmood, Allah Bakhsh Malık. A Comparative Study Of Student Satisfaction Level In Distance Learning And Live Classroom At Higher Education Level. TOJDE [Internet]. 2012 Mar. 1;13(1):128-36. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA63DF37SK