Effective Principles In Designing E-Course In Light Of Learning Theories

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 128 - 142, 01.03.2014

Muhammad K. Afıfı Saad S. Alamrı

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.43806

Cited By: 2

Öz

The researchers conducted an exploratory study to determine the design quality of some E-courses delivered via the web to a number of colleagues at the university. Results revealed a number of shortcomings in the design of these courses, mostly due to the absence of effective principles in the design of these E-courses, especially principles of pedagogy in relation to learning theories. So, this study seeks to identify effective principles in the design of courses for internet-based learning in the light of current learning theories, by answering the following question: What are the most effective principles when designing E-learning courses in the light of current learning theories? After an extensive review and analysis of the literature and previous studies relating to quality standards for the instructional design of E-courses delivered via the web, in particular, and quality standards for E-learning, in general, the results of this study revealed a number of principles for course design in E-learning. These are: identifying learning and performance outcomes; identifying methods and strategies of learning; designing learning activities; providing feedback and motivating the learner and determining the context and impact of learning. In the light of the findings of this study, with reference to the literature, we present a set of recommendations and pedagogical implications for professionals working in course design in E-learning at University of Dammam.

Anahtar Kelimeler

E-Learning, E-Course, Instructional Design, Learning Theories, University of Dammam.

Kaynakça

• Afifi, M. K. (2010). Learning Schafolding as a way to design and develop e-courses and its effectiveness on students’ performance and satisfation in E-learning environment. Journal of
• Arab Association of Educational Technology, December Issue (pp. 63-107). Alessie, S. M. & Trollip, S.R. (2001). Multimedia for Learning. (3rd ed.), Massahusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
• Al-Saleh, B. (2005). Instructional Design and its applications in designing distance learning. In
• Distance Learning between Theory and Practice. Committee of Distance Learning Authorities in GCC, Center of Distance Learning: Kuwait. Brown, A.R. & Voltz, B.D. (2005, March). Elements of effective
• E-Learning design. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, vol. 6(1), (pp. 1-7). Chen, W. & You, M. (2001). Internet mediated design course: the construction of the Internet to assist design course. Design Research, vol.2, (pp. 109–115).
• Clark, R. C. (2002, September 10). Six principles of effective e-learning: What works and why.
• Learning Solutions, (pp. 1-8) Clark, R.C. & Mayer, R. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pheiffer.
• Dabbagh, N. (2003). Scaffolding: an important teacher competency in online learning.
• TechTrends for Leaders in Education and Training, vol .47(2), (pp. 39-44). eLearnity (2001). Design dynamics for e-learning: Making e-learning successful. Retrieved from http://www.elearnity.com/index.html last accessed September 8, 2012.
• Gagne, R.M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction.
• New York: CBS College. Garrison, D. & Anderson, T. (2006). E-learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for research and practice. Translated into Arabic by M. Arbash, KSA, MOHE: Obaikan Press, Riyadh.
• Hsi, S. & Gale, C. (2003). Effective e-learning using learner-centered design. Tutorial notes of paper presented at the annual meeting, Computer Human Interaction, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
• Hsu, C-M., Yeh, Y-C. & Yen, J. (2009, January). Development of design criteria and evaluation scale for web-based learning platforms. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 39(1), (pp. 90-95).
• Hussin, H., Bunyarit, F. & Hussein, R. (2009). Instructional design and e-learning: Examining learners’ perspective in Malaysian institutions of higher learning. Campus-Wide Information Systems, vol. 26(1), (pp. 4-19).
• Jonassen, D.H. (1999). Designing constructivist leaning environment. Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
• Mahwah, NJ, (pp. 215–239). Retrieved from: http://www.coe.missouri.edu/jonassen/courses/CLE Jonassen, D.H. (2002). Designing constructivist leaning environment. Retrieved from http://www.coe.missouri.edu/jonassen/courses/CLE
• Kalyuga, S. (2007). Enhancing instructional efficiency of interactive
• E-learning environments: A Cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychology Review, vol. 19(3), (pp. 387-399). Kalyuga, S. (2009). Instructional designs for the development of transferable knowledge and skills: A cognitive load perspective. Computers in Human Behavior vol. 25, (pp.332–338).
• Khan, B. H. (2005). Managing E-learning: Design, delivery, implementation and evaluation.
• London, Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing. Kindley, R. W. (2002). Scenario-based e-learning: A step beyond traditional e-learning.
• Learning Circuits, vol. 20. Retrieved from http://www.learnigcircuits.org/2002/may2002/kindley.html last accessed November 2007.
• Kook, J. K. (2007). Student-Centered Online Support for Learning Computer Programming:
• Student Perceptions and Preliminary Study. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, vol. 4(8). Lee, J. K. & Lee, W.K. (2008). The relationship of e-Learner’s self-regulatory efficacy and perception of e-Learning environmental quality. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 24, (pp.32–47).
• McLaren, A.C. (2008). Designing effective e-learning: guidelines for practitioners. Distance
• Learning journal, vol. 5(2), (pp. 47-57). Mergle, B. (1998). Instructional Design & Learning Theory. Learning Theories of Instructional
• Design, (pp. 1-24). Retrieved from http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/mergel/brenda.htm Merrill, M. D. (2002). A pebble-in-the-pond model for instructional design. Performance Improvement, vol.4, (pp. 39-44).
• Sicilia, M-Á., Lytras, M.D., Alonso, S.S., Barriocanal, E.G. & Ros, M.Z. (2011). Modeling instructional-design theories with ontologies: Using methods to check, generate and search learning designs. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 27, (pp. 1389–1398).
• Shapiro, A. M. (2008, February). Hypermedia design as learner scaffolding. Educational
• Technology Research and Development Journal, vol. 56(1). Smith, P. L. & Ragan, J. T. (1999). Instructional Design. (2nd ed.) New York.
• SOrebO, O., Halvari, H., Gulli, V.F. & Kristiansen, R. (2009). The role of self-determination theory in explaining instructors’ motivation to continue to use eLearning technology.
• Computers & Education, vol. 53, (pp. 1177–1187).
• Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, vol. 12(2), (pp. 257-285).
• Tsai, S. & Machado, P. (2006). E- Learning, online learning, web-based learning, or distance learning unveiling the ambiguity in current terminology. Elearn Magazine: Education and Technology in Perspective, Retrieved from http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=best_practices&article=6
• Tung, H. (2003). A Study on the critical factors of the performance of E-learning application on education from the learning theory perspective. Unpublished Masters’ thesis, Ming Chuan
• University, Taipei, Taiwan. Upadhyay, N. (2006). On-Line learning: A creative environment for quality education.
• International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, vol. 3(6). Retrieved fromhttp://itdl.org/Journal/April_06/article04.htm Vovides, Y., Alonso, S. S., Mitropoulou, V. & Nickmans, G. (2007). The use of E-learning course management systems to support learning Strategies and to improve self-regulated learning.
• Educational Research Review, vol.2, (pp. 64–74). Waterhouse, S. & Rogers, R.O. (2004). The importance of policies in e-learning instruction.
• The IT Practitioner's Journal Educause Quarterly, vol. 27(3). Retrieved from: http://www.educause.edu/pub/eq/eqm04/eqm0433.asp
• Yucel, A. S. (2006, July). E-Learning approach in teacher training.
• Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education - TOJDE, vol. 7(4), (Article 11). Zaharias, P. & Poulymena, A. (2008). Design guidelines for asynchronous e-learning applications. Chapter LIII in Kidd, T.T. & Song, H. Handbook of Research on Instructional
• Systems and Technology, Volume II, Information science reference, Hershey, New York.