Facebook Groups As A Supporting Tool For Language Classrooms


Year 2014, Volume: 15 Issue: 3, 18 - 26, 01.09.2014

Arzu Ekoç

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.13403

Cited By: 10

Abstract

This paper attempts to present a review of Facebook group pages as an educational tool for language learning. One of the primary needs of foreign language learners is to gain the opportunity to use the target language outside the classroom practice. Social media communication provides occasions for learners to receive input and produce output while engaging in negotiation of meaning. In line with this point, teachers can instigate class group pages in the social media in an attempt to provide a space for practice and communication free of the traditional pedagogic concerns of a typical classroom. The distinctive discursive behaviour of Facebook group pages helps one to achieve that attempt. In light of these views, the researcher, in this study, formed a group page to understand the dynamics of social media environment as a supporting tool for language classrooms. This paper addresses various features which make social media a unique place to contribute to the sense of class community and collaboration outside the classroom. The face-to face classroom is a controlled communication event, that is, teachers and students are required to be in the classroom at the same time but a teacher’s use of Facebook is an attempt to communicate with students outside of that controlled environment where teachers can meet students in their territory. When compared to its disadvantages, the advantages of setting a class group page on the social media outweigh. Students can feel motivated to contribute to an online community if they subsequently receive support or help. It also leads students to feel that they are being supported by a whole portion of their class community and promotes students’ desire to maintain a valued relationship with others. Students continue developing and strengthening relationships with others.

Keywords

Social Media, Facebook Groups, Digital Literacies, Language Learning.

References

• Averionava, I. (2012). The language of electronic communication and its implications for
• TEFL. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 34, pp. 14 – 19. Burn, A. & Parker D. (2003). Analysing media texts, Continuum Publishing House.
• Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Darhower, M. (2002). Interactional Features of Synchronous Compuer-Mediated
• Communication in the Intermediate L2 Class: A sociocultural study. CALICO Journal, 19 (2). Dogruer, N. & Menevis, I. & Eyyam, R. (2011). What is the motivation for using
• Facebook?. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, pp. 2642–2646.
• Drexler, W. (2010). The networked student model for construction of personal learning environments: Balancing teacher control and student autonomy. Australasian Journal of
• Educational Technology, 26 (3), 369-385. Grosseck, G., Bran, R. & Tiru, L. (2011). Dear teacher, what should I write on my wall? A case study on academic uses of Facebook. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, pp. 1425–1430.
• Heritage, J. (2008). Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk. Qualitative Research,
• Theory, Method and Practice, ed. by D. Silverman, Sage Publications. Larsen-Freemn, D. & Long, M.H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research, Longman.
• Markham, A. N. (2008). Internet communication as a tool for qualitative research.
• Qualitative Research, Theory, Method, Practice, Sage Publications, pp. 95-125. Merchant, G. (2012). Unravelling the social network: theory and research. Learning,
• Media and Technology, 37 (1), 4-19. Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational
• Change, Harlow, England: Longman/Pearson Education. Rachtam, P., Kaewkitipong, L. & Firpo, D. (2012). The Use of Facebook in an Introductory
• MIS Course: Social Constructivist Learning Environment, Decision Sciences. Journal of Innovative Education, 10 (2), 165-188. Smith, B., Alvares-Torres, M. J. & Zhao, Y. (2003). Features of CMC technologies and their impact on language learners’ online interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 703– 7
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Walther, J. B. & D’Addario, K. P. (2001). The Impacts of Emoticons on Message
• Interpretation in Computer–Mediated Communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19, pp. 324-347. Wildner-Bassett, M. A. (2005). CMC as Written Conversation: A Critical Social- constructivist View of Multiple Identities and Cultural Positioning in the L2/C2
• Classroom. CALICO Journal, 22 (3), 635-656. Wodak, R. (2011). Plenary Speech: Language, power and identity. Journal of Language
• Teaching, Cambridge University Press.