Development And Evaluation Of Ning Social Network For Teaching Training Online Surveillance
Year 2013,
Volume: 14 Issue: 1, 245 - 255, 01.03.2013
Mohd Aliff MOHD Nawı
Ezad Azraai Jamsarı
Adibah Sulaıman
Abstract
Supervision of teaching practice is an important aspect of training teachers in improving their teaching skills. Barriers such as distance and time factor are the constraints faced by the lecturers at the National University of Malaysia to communicate with the teacher trainees under their supervision. Therefore, this study aims to develop and evaluate a social-networking site Ning's platform for the supervision of lecturers to teach on-line training. This study used the case design where a total of nine teacher trainees involved in this study. It found that overall, acceptance of the use of the social-networking site Ning mean score at the highest level of 3.91. In addition, all student teachers have positive attitudes towards the use of the social-networking site Ning social-networking site and agree a suitable approach to the supervision of one of the online teaching practices. While the “blog” is the most active facility used by student teachers in which they do self-reflection. In conclusion, the social-networking site Ning has the potential to assist lecturers to carry out supervision on-line teaching practice.
References
- Alger, C. & Kopcha, T. J. (2009). eSupervision: A technology framework for the 21st century field experience in teacher education. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2), 31-46.
- Barbour, M. & Plough, C. (2009). Social networking in cyberschooling: Helping to make online learning less isolating. Humanities, Social Sciences & Law, 53(4), 56-70.
- Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating
- Quantitative and Qualitative Research. (Ed). NJ: Pearson Merill Prentice Hall. Creswell, J. W. & Clark, P. V. L. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods
- Research. Thounsand Oaks, CA: Sage. Davis, M. R. (2010). Educators Eye Ning Transition to a Pay Model. Education Week, 29(31), 1-2.
- DeCosta, M., Clifton, J., Roen, D. (2010). Collaboration and social interaction in English classrooms. English Journal (High school edition), 99(5), 14-21.
- Eckman, A. (2010). It’s not new to them: using Ning.com to enhance student engagement in the study of social web marketing and web 2.0 direct response methods.
- Journal of Advertising Education, 14, 1. Esah Sulaiman, Baharuddin Aris, Mohamad Bilal Ali, Rio Sumarni Sharifuddin, Zaidatun Tasir, Megat Aman Zahiri, Noor Azean Atan, Zaleha Abdullah & Rosni Zamuddin Shah Sidek. (2003). E-Supervision dalam program latihan praktik pendidikan Universiti
- Teknologi Malaysia. Research Project Report. Fakulty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai. Levy, M & Hadar, I. (2010). Teaching MBA students the use of Web2.0: The knowledge management perspective. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(1), 55-67.
- Margaret, J. & Dusel, H. (1999). Cooperating teachers' perceptions about the student teaching experience. The Physical Educator, 56(4), 186-95.
- Nawi, M. A. M., Jamsari, E. A., Hamzah, M. I., Sulaiman, A. & Umar, A. (2012). The impact of globalization on current Islamic education. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied
- Sciences, 6(8), 74-78. http://www.ajbasweb.com/ajbas/2012/August/74-78.pdf
- Rosenfeld, E. (2008). Expanding your profesional network with Nings. Teacher Librarian, 35(3), 60.
- Roland, C. (2010). Preparing art teachers to teach in a new digital landscape. Art Education, 63(1), 17-25.
- Seppala, P. & Alamaki, H. 2003. Mobile learning in teacher training. Journal of Computer
- Assisted Learning, 19(3), 330-335.
Year 2013,
Volume: 14 Issue: 1, 245 - 255, 01.03.2013
Mohd Aliff MOHD Nawı
Ezad Azraai Jamsarı
Adibah Sulaıman
References
- Alger, C. & Kopcha, T. J. (2009). eSupervision: A technology framework for the 21st century field experience in teacher education. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2), 31-46.
- Barbour, M. & Plough, C. (2009). Social networking in cyberschooling: Helping to make online learning less isolating. Humanities, Social Sciences & Law, 53(4), 56-70.
- Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating
- Quantitative and Qualitative Research. (Ed). NJ: Pearson Merill Prentice Hall. Creswell, J. W. & Clark, P. V. L. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods
- Research. Thounsand Oaks, CA: Sage. Davis, M. R. (2010). Educators Eye Ning Transition to a Pay Model. Education Week, 29(31), 1-2.
- DeCosta, M., Clifton, J., Roen, D. (2010). Collaboration and social interaction in English classrooms. English Journal (High school edition), 99(5), 14-21.
- Eckman, A. (2010). It’s not new to them: using Ning.com to enhance student engagement in the study of social web marketing and web 2.0 direct response methods.
- Journal of Advertising Education, 14, 1. Esah Sulaiman, Baharuddin Aris, Mohamad Bilal Ali, Rio Sumarni Sharifuddin, Zaidatun Tasir, Megat Aman Zahiri, Noor Azean Atan, Zaleha Abdullah & Rosni Zamuddin Shah Sidek. (2003). E-Supervision dalam program latihan praktik pendidikan Universiti
- Teknologi Malaysia. Research Project Report. Fakulty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai. Levy, M & Hadar, I. (2010). Teaching MBA students the use of Web2.0: The knowledge management perspective. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(1), 55-67.
- Margaret, J. & Dusel, H. (1999). Cooperating teachers' perceptions about the student teaching experience. The Physical Educator, 56(4), 186-95.
- Nawi, M. A. M., Jamsari, E. A., Hamzah, M. I., Sulaiman, A. & Umar, A. (2012). The impact of globalization on current Islamic education. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied
- Sciences, 6(8), 74-78. http://www.ajbasweb.com/ajbas/2012/August/74-78.pdf
- Rosenfeld, E. (2008). Expanding your profesional network with Nings. Teacher Librarian, 35(3), 60.
- Roland, C. (2010). Preparing art teachers to teach in a new digital landscape. Art Education, 63(1), 17-25.
- Seppala, P. & Alamaki, H. 2003. Mobile learning in teacher training. Journal of Computer
- Assisted Learning, 19(3), 330-335.