Learners’ Perception Of Blended Writing Class: Blog And Face-To-Face

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4, 188 - 202, 01.12.2009

Aysel Bahce Nazmi Taslacı

Öz

The purpose of this research was to investigate student perception of blended writing classes. It was conducted with intermediate level EFL learners in the preparatory school at Anadolu University. Data consisted of student reflections. The first reflection aimed at finding out learners’ perception of fall term writing lessons, and, the instant and final reflections aimed at finding out learner perception of blended writing lessons. Although learners’ perception of writing lessons was negative in the first reflections, they changed into positive in the latter ones. The findings indicated that blended writing class had changed students’ perception of writing lessons positively. Therefore, this kind of classes may help students develop a positive attitude towards writing by providing meaningful writing opportunities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Blended Writing Class, Meaningful Writing, Blog, Blogging, Authentic Writing

Kaynakça

• Ahonen, M., Joyce, B., Leino, M. & Turunen, H. (2003). ―Mobile Learning – A Different
• Viewpoint‖. In: Kynäslahti, H. & Seppälä, P. (Eds.) Professional Mobile Learning. Helsinki, IT Pres. Brooks, D. (2001). W. Web Teaching. A Guide to Designing Interactive Teaching for the World Wide Web. Second Edition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, USA.
• Dudeney, G. and N. Hockly (2007). How to Teach English with Technology. Malaysia:
• Pearson Education Limited. Graham, C. R. (2006) Chapter 1: Blended learning systems: definiton, current trends, future directions. In Bonk, C. J. and Graham, C. R. (eds.), Handbook of Blended
• Learning: Global perspectives, local designs (2006). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
• Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Cognitive Tools for Learning. Ed by P. A. M. Kommers et al, NATO.
• Leone, S. (2008). The use of new technologies in advanced Italian Classes. In I. Olney,
• G. Lefoe, J. Mantei, & J. Herrington (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Emerging Technologies Conference 2008 (pp.120-129). Wollongong: University of Wollongong.
• Lockhart, C., and Ng, P. (1995). Analyzing Talk in ESL Peer Response Groups: Stances,
• Functions and Content, Language Learning Vol. 46/3, pp. 274-283. Mangelsdorf, K., (1992). ―Peer Reviews in the ESL Composition Classroom: What do the Students Think‖. ELT Journal, Vol. 46/3, pp. 274-283
• Mishan, F. (2004). Designing Authenticity into Language Learning Materials. Bristol, GBR: Intellect Books.
• Salaberry, M. R. (2003). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The Modern language Journal, Vol. 85 No. 1 Special Issue: A
• Century of Language teaching and research: looking Back and Looking Ahead, Part 2 (Spring, 2001), pp. 39-56.
• Scagnoli, N. (2005) Blended learning: An instructional challenge and a learning opportunityVoices 186, August/September.
• Stracke, E. (2007). A road to understanding: A qualitative study into why learners drop out of a blended language learning (BLL) environment. ReCALL 19 (1), pp. 57-78.
• Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single-subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
• Zhao, Y. (2001). Recent developments in technology and Language learning: A literature review and Meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21 (1), pp. 7-27.