Research Article

Dyadic Assessment of Perceived Partner Forgiveness and Relationship Investment Model in Turkish Romantic Couples

Volume: 13 Number: 70 September 30, 2023
EN

Dyadic Assessment of Perceived Partner Forgiveness and Relationship Investment Model in Turkish Romantic Couples

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between perceived partner forgiveness and relationship investment variables [relationship satisfaction, quality of alternatives, investment size,] in dyadic context. The data were collected from 116 heterosexual romantic couples (n = 232) in the 18-30 age group having at least six months of romantic relationship. This study employed cross-sectional correlational study design. Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) was used to examine the predictive effect of independent variables of the couples on their dependent variables (actor) and their partners’ dependent variables (partner). In this study, dependent variables are relationship satisfaction, quality of alternatives and investment size, independent variable is subjective partner forgiveness. Subjective Partner Forgiveness Scale, The Investment Model Scale were used for data collection. The results suggest that as the level of forgiveness experienced by men and women increase relationship satisfaction increases in the relations between relationship satisfaction and perceived partner forgiveness. Results of the quality of the options and perceived partner forgiveness indicate that the partners' assessment of the quality of alternative decrease as the perceived forgiveness level of both men and women increase. Results of relationship investment and perceived partner forgiveness indicate that the partners' assessment of relationship investment increases as perceived forgiveness in women and men increase. The results were discussed in the context of relevant literature.

Keywords

References

  1. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Pychologist, 55(5), 469. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
  2. Ashby, H. U. (2003). Being forgiven: toward a thicker description of forgiveness. Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling, 57(2), 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/15423050030570
  3. Ashton, M. C., Paunonen, S. V., Helmes, E., & Jackson, D. N. (1998). Kin altruism, reciprocal altruism, and the Big Five personality factors. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00009-9
  4. Aydın, F.T. (2017). Forgiveness as a positive character strength. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being, 5(1), 1-22.
  5. Aydogan, D., & Ozbay, Y. (2018). Mediation role of dyadic coping on parenting stress and relational resilience in couples. Marriage & Family Review, 54(2), 128-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2017.1302900
  6. Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0
  7. Bono, G., & McCullough, M. E. (2004). Religion, forgiveness, and adjustment in older adulthood. In K. W. Schaie, N. Krause, and A. Booth (Eds), Religious influences on health and well-being in the elderly (pp. 163-187). Springer Publishing.
  8. Braithwaite, S. R., Selby, E. A., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Forgiveness and relationship satisfaction: Mediating mechanisms. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(4), 551. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024526

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Psychology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 30, 2023

Submission Date

December 2, 2022

Acceptance Date

September 3, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 13 Number: 70

APA
Eker Durmuş, E., & Özbay, Y. (2023). Dyadic Assessment of Perceived Partner Forgiveness and Relationship Investment Model in Turkish Romantic Couples. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 13(70), 273-286. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1213917.1
AMA
1.Eker Durmuş E, Özbay Y. Dyadic Assessment of Perceived Partner Forgiveness and Relationship Investment Model in Turkish Romantic Couples. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal. 2023;13(70):273-286. doi:10.17066/tpdrd.1213917.1
Chicago
Eker Durmuş, Esra, and Yaşar Özbay. 2023. “Dyadic Assessment of Perceived Partner Forgiveness and Relationship Investment Model in Turkish Romantic Couples”. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal 13 (70): 273-86. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1213917.1.
EndNote
Eker Durmuş E, Özbay Y (September 1, 2023) Dyadic Assessment of Perceived Partner Forgiveness and Relationship Investment Model in Turkish Romantic Couples. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal 13 70 273–286.
IEEE
[1]E. Eker Durmuş and Y. Özbay, “Dyadic Assessment of Perceived Partner Forgiveness and Relationship Investment Model in Turkish Romantic Couples”, Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, vol. 13, no. 70, pp. 273–286, Sept. 2023, doi: 10.17066/tpdrd.1213917.1.
ISNAD
Eker Durmuş, Esra - Özbay, Yaşar. “Dyadic Assessment of Perceived Partner Forgiveness and Relationship Investment Model in Turkish Romantic Couples”. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal 13/70 (September 1, 2023): 273-286. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1213917.1.
JAMA
1.Eker Durmuş E, Özbay Y. Dyadic Assessment of Perceived Partner Forgiveness and Relationship Investment Model in Turkish Romantic Couples. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal. 2023;13:273–286.
MLA
Eker Durmuş, Esra, and Yaşar Özbay. “Dyadic Assessment of Perceived Partner Forgiveness and Relationship Investment Model in Turkish Romantic Couples”. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, vol. 13, no. 70, Sept. 2023, pp. 273-86, doi:10.17066/tpdrd.1213917.1.
Vancouver
1.Esra Eker Durmuş, Yaşar Özbay. Dyadic Assessment of Perceived Partner Forgiveness and Relationship Investment Model in Turkish Romantic Couples. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal. 2023 Sep. 1;13(70):273-86. doi:10.17066/tpdrd.1213917.1

Cited By

!! From 30 November 2023, English language proofreading will be required for accepted articles to ensure language quality.