The Involvement of Learning Mathematics Via Teachers’ Autonomy Support and The Fulfilment of Basic Psychological Needs

Abstract

Mathematics is one of the compulsory subjects for high school students in Indonesia. However, not many of them like mathematics. Students’ low learning engagement in mathematics is affected by the social contexts of friends, teachers, and parents and the fulfilment of the students’ basic psychological needs. Teachers’ autonomy support to improve students’ engagement is essential, especially in mathematics learning. This research was aimed at looking into the roles of the fulfilment of basic psychological needs as the element mediating teacher autonomy support and student engagement. The number of respondents of this research was 102. They were students of various high schools in Indonesia. The instruments were the autonomy support scale for measuring the teachers’ autonomy support, the “feeling I have” scale for measuring the fulfilment of basic psychological needs, and the engagement scale for measuring the students’ engagement. The employed analysis technique was the simple mediation model analysis. The results of this study indicate the partial mediation of the fulfilment of basic psychological needs between the teachers’ autonomy support and the student’s engagement. This finding implies that teachers should understand better that every student has basic psychological needs which can be fulfilled through teacher autonomy support, which, in turn, leads to learning engagement.

Keywords

• Teacher autonomy support
• learning engagement
• fulfilment of basic psychological needs

References

1. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Joumal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 0663.84.3.261
2. Azila-gbettor, E. M., Mensah, C., Abiemo, M. K., Mensah, C., Abiemo, M. K., & Bokor, M. (2021). Predicting student engagement from self-efficacy and autonomous motivation : A cross-sectional study Predicting student engagement from self-efficacy and autonomous motivation : A. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1942638.
3. Benita, M., Roth, G., & Deci, E. L. (2014). When are mastery goals more adaptive? It depends on experiences of autonomy support and autonomy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034007.
4. Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Sheldon, K.M., (2011). Human autonomy in cross-cultural context. perspectives on the psychology of agency, freedon, and well-being. Springer
5. Connell, J.P., & Wellborn. J.G. (1991). Competence, Autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. The Minnesota symposia on child psychology, 23. https://drjameswellborn.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Connel-and- Wellborn-Chapter.pdf
6. Cozby, P. C., & Bates, S. C. (2012). Methods in behavioral research (11th ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “ what ” and “ why ” of goal pursuits : Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory ,11(4), 227–268.
8. Dweck, C. S. (1996). Capturing the dynamic nature of personality. Joumal of Research in Personality, 30, 348-362. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.l996.0024

9. Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2001). Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 139-156. https://doi.org/10.1023/A: 1009057102306
10. Flunger, B., Hollmann, L., Hornstra, L., & Murayama, K. (2022). It’s more about a lesson than a domain: Lesson-specific autonomy support, motivation, and engagement in math and a second language. Learning and Instruction, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101500
11. Fredricks, J. A., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement : Potential of the Concept , State of the Evidence. 74(1), 59–109.
12. Grolnick, W. S., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1997). Intemalization within the family: The self-determination theory perspective. In J. E. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Parenting and children's intemalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 135-161). New York, NY: Wiley.
13. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press
14. Hornstra, L., Stroet, K., van Eijden, E., Goudsblom, J., & Roskamp, C. (2018). Teacher expectation effects on need-supportive teaching, student motivation, and engagement: a self-determination perspective. Educational Research and Evaluation, 24(3–5), 324–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2018.1550841
15. Kaur, A. (2017). A Cultural Insight into the Development of Teacher Autonomy Support Scale : A Self-Determination Theory Perspective A cultural insight into the development of teacher autonomy support scale : A self- determination theory perspective Rosna Awang-Hashim , R (Issue April 2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-09-2016-0050
16. Kyttälä, M., & Björn, P. M. (2021). Mathematics Performance Profiles and Relation to Math Avoidance in Adolescence : The Role of Literacy Skills , General Cognitive Ability and Math Anxiety. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1983645.
17. LaGuardia, J.G., & Patrick, H. (2008). Self-determination theory as a fundamental theory of close relationships. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 201-209. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012760.
18. Laursen, B., & Little, T. D. (2012). Handbook of developmental research methods. Guilford Press.
19. Liu, H., Yao, M., Li, J., & Li, R. (2021). Multiple mediators in the relationship between perceived teacher autonomy support and student engagement in math and literacy learning. Educational Psychology, 41(2), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1837346
20. Mathieson, Rachel Homer, M., Mathieson, R., & Homer, M. (2022). Research in Mathematics Education “ I was told it would help with my Psychology ”: Do post-16 Core Maths qualifications in England support other subjects ? Core Maths quali fi cations in England support other subjects ? Research in Mathematics Education ISSN: https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2021.1959391
21. Patrick, H., Knee, C.R., Canevello, A., & Lonsbary, C. (2007). The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 434-457. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.434.
22. PISA. (2018). Indonesia What 15-year-old students in Indonesia know and can do Figure 1 . Snapshot of performance in reading , mathematics and science. Programme for International Student Assesment(PISA) Result Prom PISA 2018, I–III, 1–10.
23. Pitzer, J., & Skinner, E. (2016). Predictors of changes in students’ motivational resilience over the school year: The roles of teacher support, self-appraisals, and emotional reactivity. International Journalof Behavioral Development, 41(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025416642051.
24. Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Elements of the competitive situation that affect intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 24-33
25. Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 183–203). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
26. Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 225-236.
27. Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006).What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1),209–218.
28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209
29. Robertson, S. L. (2021). Provincializing the OECD-PISA global competences project. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 19(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1887725
30. Rohinsa, M., Maranatha, U. K., Cahyadi, S., Padjadjaran, U., Djunaidi, A., & Padjadjaran, U. (2019). Peran Teacher Autonomy Support terhadap Engagement Siswa melalui Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Psikologis Dasar. https://doi.org/10.24014/jp.v15i2.7423.
31. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychology Association, 55(1), 68-78. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11392867/.
32. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. In self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806.
33. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom : Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581.
34. Skinner, Ellen A Belmont, M. J., Lynch, M., Mellor-crummey, C., Miserandino, M., Patrick, B., Regan, C., Wellborn, J., & Usinger, P. (1993). Motivation in the Classroom : Reciprocal Effects of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement Across the School Year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581.
35. TIMSS. (2015). T15-International-Results-in-Mathematics.pdf.