EN
The Mediating Role of Mentalization Capacity in The Relationship Between Family Unpredictability and The Infidelity Tendency
Abstract
The primary aim of this study is to investigate the mediating role of mentalization capacity in the relationship between family unpredictability and the tendency toward infidelity (extradyadic involvement). Family unpredictability refers to the inconsistencies in family behaviors and regulatory systems, while infidelity, within the context of a romantic relationship, refers to a partner's violation of norms regulating emotional or physical intimacy with others outside the relationship. Mentalization is the ability to understand the conscious or unconscious states of mind of oneself and others. The study's participants consisted of 441 middle-aged adults involved in romantic relationships, including dating, engaged, or married. The Retrospective Family Unpredictability Scale, The Mentalization Scale, The Infidelity Tendency Scale, and the Socio-demographic Data Form were used in this study. Structural Equation Modelling was employed to test the proposed model. Findings indicated that family unpredictability significantly predicted both the tendency toward infidelity (extradyadic involvement) and mentalization capacity in middle-aged adults involved in romantic relationships. Mentalization capacity, in turn, was identified as a partial mediator in the relationship between family unpredictability and the tendency toward infidelity. These findings suggest that individuals who experience inconsistencies in family behaviors and regulatory systems may be more prone to infidelity, potentially due to compromised mentalization capacity. The findings obtained in this study highlight the significance of stable family environments and the development of mentalization skills in the risk of infidelity in romantic relationships.
Keywords
References
- Ainsworth, M. D., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment:Assessed in the strange situation and at home. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Atkins, D. C., Baucom, D. H., & Jacobson, N. S. (2001). Understanding infidelity: Correlates in a national random sample. Journal of Family Psychology, 15(4), 735-739.
- Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2013). Mentalization-based treatment. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 33, 595-613. Bornstein, M. H. (2002). Handbook of parenting, Vol. 5: Practical issues in parenting. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. Basic Books.
- Bowlby, J. (1994). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. Routledge.
- Bumpass, L. L., Sweet, J. A., & Cherlin, A. (1991). The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 913–927.
- Carlton, B. S., Goebert, D. A., Miyamoto, R. H., Andrade, N. N., Hishinuma, E. S., Makini, G., & Nishimura, S. T. (2006). Resilience, family adversity, and well-being among Hawaiian and non-Hawaiian adolescents. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 52, 291-308.
- Dimitrijević, A., Hanak, N., Altaras Dimitrijević, A., & Jolić-Marjanović, Z. (2018). The mentalization scale (MentS): A self-report measure for the assessment of mentalizing capacity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 268-280.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Family Counseling
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
June 30, 2025
Submission Date
March 20, 2024
Acceptance Date
December 28, 2024
Published in Issue
Year 2025 Volume: 15 Number: 77
APA
Kakırman Moroğlu, A. (2025). The Mediating Role of Mentalization Capacity in The Relationship Between Family Unpredictability and The Infidelity Tendency. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 15(77), 242-254. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1455910
AMA
1.Kakırman Moroğlu A. The Mediating Role of Mentalization Capacity in The Relationship Between Family Unpredictability and The Infidelity Tendency. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal. 2025;15(77):242-254. doi:10.17066/tpdrd.1455910
Chicago
Kakırman Moroğlu, Aygül. 2025. “The Mediating Role of Mentalization Capacity in The Relationship Between Family Unpredictability and The Infidelity Tendency”. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal 15 (77): 242-54. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1455910.
EndNote
Kakırman Moroğlu A (June 1, 2025) The Mediating Role of Mentalization Capacity in The Relationship Between Family Unpredictability and The Infidelity Tendency. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal 15 77 242–254.
IEEE
[1]A. Kakırman Moroğlu, “The Mediating Role of Mentalization Capacity in The Relationship Between Family Unpredictability and The Infidelity Tendency”, Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, vol. 15, no. 77, pp. 242–254, June 2025, doi: 10.17066/tpdrd.1455910.
ISNAD
Kakırman Moroğlu, Aygül. “The Mediating Role of Mentalization Capacity in The Relationship Between Family Unpredictability and The Infidelity Tendency”. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal 15/77 (June 1, 2025): 242-254. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1455910.
JAMA
1.Kakırman Moroğlu A. The Mediating Role of Mentalization Capacity in The Relationship Between Family Unpredictability and The Infidelity Tendency. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal. 2025;15:242–254.
MLA
Kakırman Moroğlu, Aygül. “The Mediating Role of Mentalization Capacity in The Relationship Between Family Unpredictability and The Infidelity Tendency”. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, vol. 15, no. 77, June 2025, pp. 242-54, doi:10.17066/tpdrd.1455910.
Vancouver
1.Aygül Kakırman Moroğlu. The Mediating Role of Mentalization Capacity in The Relationship Between Family Unpredictability and The Infidelity Tendency. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal. 2025 Jun. 1;15(77):242-54. doi:10.17066/tpdrd.1455910