A Systematic Review On Psychological Capital And Psychological Well-Being (1993-2023)

Abstract

In the literature, many studies have been conducted on the terms of psychological capital and psychological well-being over the last thirty years. However, it has been observed that the interest in these concepts has increased today. Most of the studies have been obtained at the relational level or with quantitative methods. However, the number of studies in which the constructs of psychological capital and psychological wellbeing are examined systematically or qualitatively is quite limited. In this research, a systematic mapping was made for the relevant concepts using R and Rstudio programs together, with the help of data obtained from Wos. In this way, potential researchers will be capable of seeing the conditions of the relationship between psychological capital and psychological well-being in the last thirty years and will be able to have deeper and clearer information about the levels of related concepts. When we look at the most emphasised key concepts based on the analysis, it is sighted that keywords such as leadership, social capital, old age, hedonic well-being and good mood are at the forefront. When looking at niche areas of study, keywords such as climate change, adaptation, migration and innovation emerge. In other words, scientists doing research in the branches of administration and organisational or non-clinical psychology should look at graphs containing motor or basic concepts, if they want to do a deeper investigation and understand the subject in general. Based on these data, although the terms psychological capital and well-being are thought to be in the context of affirmative psychology, their relationship with the concepts that are popularly described as dark behaviours is also examined. By offering a systematic examination and guidance for the future, the data of the study adds something unique to the literature.

Keywords

• Psychological capital
• Psychological well-being
• Bibliometric analysis
• WoS.

References

1. Akçay, V. H. (2012). Pozitif psikolojik sermayenin iş tatmini ile ilişkisi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), 123-140. https://resolver.ebscohost.com/openurl?sid=google&auinit=VH&aulast=Ak%c3%a7ay&atitle=Pozitif+psikolojik+sermayenin+i%c5%9f+tatmini+ile+ili%c5%9fkisi&title=Kahramanmara%c5%9f+S%c3%bct%c3%a7%c3%bc+%c4%b0mam+%c3%9cniversitesi+%c4%b0ktisadi+ve+%c4%b0dari+Bilimler+Fak%c3%bcltesi+Dergisi&volume=2&issue=1&date=2012&spage=123&issn=2146-5908&site=ftf-live
2. Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. MD., & Baharun R. (2020). Research trends of neuromarketing: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 98(15), 2948-2962. https://www.jatit.org/
3. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
4. Aykan, E., & Karakuş, G. (2022). Örgütlerde Politika Algılamalarının Sapkın Örgütsel Davranışlar Üzerindeki Etkileri: Pozitif Psikolojik Sermayenin Aracı Rolü. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, (36), 63-82. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ulikidince
5. Danvila-del-Valle, I., Estevez-Mendoza, C., & Lara, F. J. (2019). Human resources training: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 101, 627-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.026
6. Demiray, S., & İrge, N. T. (2022). Psikolojik sermaye ve lider üye etkileşiminin iş becerikliliği ve örgütsel sinerjiye etkisi: Kamu hastanesi örneği. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 10(1), 261-279. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v10i1.1998
7. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 133, 285-296. Ellegaard, O. (2018). The application of bibliometric analysis: Disciplinary and user aspects. Scientometrics, 116, 181–202. i: https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v10i1.1998
8. Güler, B. K. (2009). Pozitif psikolojik sermaye: Tanımı, bileşenleri ve yönetimi. Çalışma yaşamında davranış güncel yaklaşımlar, İzmit: Umuttepe Yayınları. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/150995

9. Karacaoğlu K, Kaplan A (2013) İşi erteleme (Procrastination) ile öncüllerinden biri olan öz yeterlilik ilişkisi: Üniversite personeli üzerine bir araştırma. 21.Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı 339-343. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11787/1893
10. Karatepe, H. K., Kuşcu, F. N., & Karaman, M. (2019). Psikolojik sermayenin bireysel performansa etkisi: Hemşireler üzerinde bir araştırma. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7, 105-114. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.520715
11. Kaya D (2012) Psikolojik sermaye ve mesleki bağlılık ilişkisine kariyer planlamasının etkilerinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir model önerisi. Doktora tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Anabilim Dalı, Yönetim ve Organizasyon Bilim Dalı, Konya. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.622171
12. Keyes CLM, Shmotkin D, Ryff CD (2002) Optimizing well-being: The emprical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(6): 1007-1022. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007
13. Khanra, S., Dhir, A., & Mantymaki, M. (2020). Big data analytics and enterprises: A bibliometric synthesis of the literatüre. Enterprise Information Systems, 14(6), 737-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2020.1734241 Küçük, Ö. (2020). Okul müdürlerinin toksik liderlik davranışları ile okul etkililiği arasındaki ilişkide örgütsel sinizm ve psikolojik sermayenin aracılık etkisi.
14. Luthans F, Avolio BJ, Avey BJ, Norman MS (2007) Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Published in Personnel Psychology 60: 541–572.https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/leadershipfacpub/11/utm_source=digitalcommons.unl.edu%2Fleadershipfacpub%2F11&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
15. Luthans, F., & Broad, J. D. (2022). Positive psychological capital to help combat the mental health fallout from the pandemic and VUCA environment. Organizational dynamics, 51(2), 100817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2020.100817
16. Moral-Munoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An upto-date review. El Profesional de la Información, 29(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
17. Newman, A., Ucbasaran, D., Zhu, F. E. I., & Hirst, G. (2014). Psychological capital: A review and synthesis. Journal of organizational behavior, 35(S1), S120-S138. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:14560050
18. Novitasari, D., Siswanto, E., Purwanto, A., & Fahmi, K. (2020). Authentic leadership and innovation: what is the role of psychological capital?. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 1(1), 1-21. DOI:10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v3i5p103
19. Oruç, E., & Kutanis, R. Ö. (2014). Pozitif örgütsel davranış ve pozitif psikolojik sermaye üzerine kavramsal bir inceleme. The Journal of Happiness and Well-Being, 2(2), 145-159. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358644035_Pozitif_orgutsel_davranis_ve_pozitif_psikolojik_sermaye_uzerine_kavramsal_bir_inceleme_A_theoretical_investigation_on_positive_organizational_behavior_and_positive_psychological_capital
20. Özkalp E (2009) Örgütsel davranışta yeni bir boyut: pozitif (olumlu) örgütsel davranış yaklaşımı ve konuları. 17. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Mayıs 21-23.
21. Polatçı S (2011) Psikolojik sermayenin performans üzerindeki etkisinde iş aile yayılımı ve psikolojik iyi oluşun rolü. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Erciyes Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Anabilim Dalı, Yönetim ve Organizasyon Bilim Dalı, Kayseri. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ataunisosbil/issue/2832/38495
22. Riahi, Y., Saikouk, T., Gunasekaran, A. & Badraoui, I. (2021). Artificial ıntelligence applications in supply chain: A descriptive bibliometric analysis and future research directions. Expert Systems with Applications, 173, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114702
23. Ryan RM, Deci EL (2001) On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology 52: 141-166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
24. Ryff CD, Keyes CLM (1995) The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69(4): 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
25. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of happiness studies, 9, 13-39.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0
26. Ryff, C. D., Boylan, J. M., & Kirsch, J. A. (2021). Eudaimonic and hedonic well-being. Measuring well-being, 92-135. https://aging.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1131/2021/06/Eudaimonic-and-Hedonic-Well-Being.pdf
27. Stewart, M., Reid, G., & Mangham, C. (1997). Fostering children's resilience. Journal of pediatric nursing, 12(1), 21-31.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-5963(97)80018-8
28. Wang, Q., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2020). Event study methodology in business research: A bibliometric analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(10), 1863-1900. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-12-2019-0671