Predicting The Digital Burnout Levels of Youth

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the roles of loneliness and depression–anxiety–stress in predicting digital burnout levels among young individuals. The sample consisted of 598 young individuals (368 females, 230 males) recruited from the provinces of Kayseri and Kırşehir. Data were collected using a Personal Information Form developed by the researcher, the Digital Burnout Scale (DBS), the UCLA Loneliness Scale–Short Form (ULS-8), and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21). The data were analyzed using SPSS 26. Correlational analyses indicated a moderately significant positive relationship between digital burnout and loneliness, and a highly significant positive relationship between digital burnout and depression, anxiety, and stress. Loneliness (ULS-8) and all subscales of the DASS-21 were found to significantly predict digital burnout. Together, loneliness, depression, anxiety, and stress accounted for 55% of the variance in digital burnout. Additionally, statistically significant differences in digital burnout levels were observed based on gender, employment status, daily internet use duration, frequency of notification checking, and primary purpose of digital device use. However, no significant differences were found in digital burnout levels based on academic achievement. Overall, this study contributes to the literature by highlighting the associations among youth mental health, loneliness, and digital habits, and provides insights for developing preventive intervention strategies targeting digital burnout.

Keywords

• Youth
• Digital Burnout
• Loneliness
• Depression
• Anxiety
• Stress

References

1. Akbaş, A. & Çarıkçı, O. (2022). Effect of digital burnout on accounting professionals. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management Perspectives, 6(2), 235-253. https://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ijbemp.58178
2. Altınok, M. (2021). Investigation of high school students' digital addiction and life satisfaction. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 19(1), 262-291. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.689774
3. Altundağ, Y. & Bulut, S. (2016). Aday sınıf öğretmenlerinde problemli internet kullanımının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 5, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.321421
4. Arkhipova, D. (2024). Semiosis in artificial intelligence-mediated environments: Exploring the signs of social media burnout. In, Explorations in Dynamic Semiosis (pp. 251-274). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47001-1_11
5. Balcı, Ş., & Kaya-Güler, E. (2023). The mediating role of digital tool use in the relationship between experiential avoidance and digital addiction. Turkish Review of Communication Studies, 44, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17829/turcom.1194744
6. Bailenson, J. N. (2021). Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technology, Mindand Behavior, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030
7. Baltacı, Ö. (2017). Psychosocial factors that predict internet addiction (Publication No. 485916) [Master thesis, Gazi University]. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
8. Baltacı, Ö. (2019). The predictive relationships between the social media addiction and social anxiety, loneliness, and happiness. International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(4), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.203.6

9. Bilge, Y., Baydili, K. N., & Göktaş, S. Ş. (2020). Anxiety, stress and daily social media use in predicting social media addiction: A sample of vocational school. Journal of Dependence, 21(3), 223-235
10. Bulatbaeva, K., Mukhamedkhanova, A., Toibazarova, N., Maigeldiyeva, S., Nurkasymova, S., &Rezuanova, G. (2023). Analysis of the relationships between school children’s technology addiction and school achievement. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Scienceand Technology,11(5), 1219-1237. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3622.
11. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F., (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (14. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
12. Chang, D. (2014). Digital burnout: The new, invisible threat to businesses. Retrieved January 11, 2025, from https://fluxtrends.com/digital-burnout-the-new-invisible-threat-to-businesses/
13. Costa, R. M., Patrão, I., & Machado, M. (2019). Problematic internet use and feelings of loneliness. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 23(2), 160-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2018.1539180
14. Çelik-Durmuş, Gülnar & Özveren (2022). Determining digital burnout in nursing students: A descriptive research study. Nurse Education Today, 111(1), 105300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105300
15. Çiçek, B., Şahin, H., & Erkal, S. (2021). Covid-19 salgın döneminde üniversite öğrencilerinin akıllı telefon bağımlılığının incelenmesi [Özel sayı]. Gençlik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9, 52-80. https://doi.org/10.52528/genclikarastirmalari.771890
16. daSilva, F. P., Jerónimo, H. M., Henriques, P. L., &Ribeiro, J. (2024). Impact of digital burnout on the use of digital consumer platforms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, 123172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123172
17. deMascarenhas-Franco, M. I. (2022). O efeito do burnout digital no envolvimento académico dos estudantes universitários [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Lisbon]. Repository of theUniversity of Lisbon.
18. Doğan, T., Çötok, N. A., & Tekin, E. G. (2011). Reliability and validity of theTurkish version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS-8) among university students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2058–2062 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.053
19. Ertemel, A. V., & Eroğlu-Pektaş, G. Ö. (2018). Mobile technology addiction in terms of consumer behavior in the digitizing world: A qualitative research on university students. Yıldız Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(2), 18-34.
20. Erten, P. (2019). The attitudes of the z generation towards digital technology. Gümüşhane University Social Sciences Institute Electronical Journal, 10(1), 190-202.
21. Erten, P., & Özdemir, O. (2020). The Digital Burnout Scale development study. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 21(2), 668-683. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.597890
22. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3nd Edition). London: Sage.
23. George, D. &Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 25 step by step a simple guide and reference. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
24. Gonçalves, L. L., Nardi, A. E., Dos Santos, H., Rodrigues, D., & King, A. L. S. (2022). Use of digital technologies in homeoffice work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health: CP & EMH, 18, e174501792208190. https://doi.org/10.2174/17450179-v18-e2208190
25. Göker, M. E., & Turan, Ş. (2020). Problematic technology use in the covid-19 pandemic. ESTUDAM Public Health Journal, 5, 108-114. https://doi.org/10.35232/estudamhsd.767526
26. Göksel, A. G., Caz, Ç., & Zorba, E. (2018). Investigation of individuals who use sports service’ social appearance anxiety and subjective happiness. Gaziantep University Journal of Sport Science, 3(3), 88-101.
27. Göldağ, B. (2022). An investigation of the relationship between university students' digital burnout levels and perceived stres levels. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 7(1), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.958039
28. Gürbüz, S. & Şahin, F. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri (2. baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
29. Kahraman, N. (2023). The examination of the relationship between phubbing and digital burnout levels: The case of Anadolu University (Publication No. 783110) [Doctoral dissertation, Anadolu University]. Retrievedfromhttps://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
30. Kalaycı, Ş. (2009). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik uygulamaları. Ankara: Asil Yayınevi
31. Kanat, H. (2020). Determination of relationship between social efficacy and internet addiction of university students (Publication No. 621121) [Master thesis, Karabük University]. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
32. Karasar, N. (2022). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
33. Karslı, B. (2022). Analysis of the relationship of social media addiction and loneliness in university students (Publication No.766371) [Master thesis, Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University]. Retrievedfromhttps://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
34. Katırcı, E. K., & Bulut, S. (2024). Effects of social media on children and adolescents: A literature review. Journal of Ibn Haldun Studies, 9(2), 125-144. https://doi.org/10.36657/ihcd.2024.122
35. Korkmaz, Y. (2014). High school students’ depression, anxiety, stress and internet dependence and prediction of some variables by relationship (Publication No.417727) [Master thesis, Hasan Kalyoncu University]. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
36. Küpeli, T. (2023). The relationship between loneliness, fear of missing out (FoMO) and smartphone addiction with phubbing in university students (Publication No. 802164) [Master thesis, Beykoz University]. Retrievedfromhttps://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
37. Lovibond, P. F., &Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) withthe Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u
38. Mao, P., Cai, Z., Chen, B., & Sun, X. (2024). The association between problematic internet use and burnout: A three-level meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 352, 321-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.240
39. OED. (2025). Digital. Retrieved January 14, 2025, from https://www.oed.com/search/dictionary/?scope=Entries&q=digital
40. Pew Research Center. (2022). Social media seen as mostly good for democracy across many nations, but U.S. is a major outlier. Retrieved January 18, 2025, from https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2022/12/06/social-media-seen-as-mostly-good-for-democracy-across-many-nations-but-u-s-is-a-major-outlier
41. RTÜK. (2022). Gençlerin medya kullanımı ve dijital okuryazarlık araştırması.Retrieved January 27, 2025, fromhttps://www.rtuk.gov.tr/Media/FM/Kamuoyu/genclerin_medya_kullanimi_ve_dijital_okuryazarlik_arastirmasi_.pdf
42. Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., &Cutrona, C. E. (1980). Therevised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472
43. Salmela-Aro, K., &Motti-Stefanidi, F. (2022). Digital revolution and youth. European Psychologist, 27(2), 73-75. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000483
44. Sili-Kalem, A. (2022). Sociology in theface of thedigitalization of everyday life. Journal of CivilizationandSociety, 6(2), 95-102.
45. Singh, M. M., Amiri, M., &Sabbarwal, S. (2017). Social media use positive and negative effects on the life style of Indian youth. Iranian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 5(3).
46. Stawarz, K., Cox, A. L., Bird, J. &Benedyk, R. (2013). "I'd sit at homeand do workemails": how tablets affect the work-life balance of office workers. “I’d sit at home and do work emails”: How tablets affect the work-life balance of office workers” [Conference presentation]. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – Proceedings, France.
47. Tabachnick, B. G. &Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
48. TDK. (2022). Türk dil kurumu sözlükleri. https://sozluk.gov.tr
49. Thomson, P., Johnson, M., &Devlin, J. M. (2017). Conquering digital overload: Leadership strategies that build engaging work cultures. Cham: Springer Nature.
50. Turan-Eroğlu, D., Ayaz, F., & Ayaz, H. (2024). A content analysis of the publications on the problems caused by internet use. Iğdır University Journal of Social Sciences, 36, 447-472.
51. TURKSTAT. (2024). İstatistiklerle gençlik, 2023. Retrieved January 28, 2025, fromhttps://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Istatistiklerle-Genclik-2023-53677
52. Uslu, M. (2021). The analysis of social media addiction and use in Turkey. Turkish Academic Research Review, 6(2), 370-396. https://doi.org/10.30622/tarr.933479
53. Üzgü, M. A., Bozgüney, R., Can, B., Özlü, M., Akat, A., Güneş, F., & Çalık, F. (2023). Examination of university students' digital addiction and levels of loneliness. Düzce University Journal of Sports Science, 3(1), 75-82.
54. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2011). Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.08.020
55. Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12290
56. We Are Social. (2023). Social media use reaches new milestone. https://wearesocial.com/us/blog/2023/07/social-media-use-reaches-new-milestone/
57. Yang, X. &Du, J. (2024). The effect of teacher self-efficacy, online pedagogical and content knowledge, and emotion regulation on teacher digital burnout: A mediation model. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01540-z
58. Yavuz, O. (2018). The effects of internet addiction on school success during adolescence. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 8(15), 1056-1080. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.426914
59. Yılmaz, Ö., Boz, H. & Arslan, A. (2017). The validity and reliability of depression stress and anxiety scale (DASS21) Turkish short form. Research of Financial Economic and Social Studies, 2(2), 78-91.
60. Yılmaz, M., Atalar, U., & Topal, E. Ş. (2023). Digitalization in Türkiye and youth's perceptions of family representation on internet-based movie-series platforms: The case of Kahramanmaraş. Turkish Journal of Social Policy, 4(2), 145-167