The Features of Transgression as Predictors of Forgiveness of Others

Year 2011, Volume: 4 Issue: 35, 8 - 15, 26.05.2011

Aslı Bugay Ayhan Demir

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the contribution of the features of transgression on forgiveness of others. The sample consisted of 376 (196 female, 180 male) university students. The Turkish version of Heartland Forgiveness Scale (Bugay &Demir, 2010) and The Features of Transgression Questionnaire were used to collect the data. In order to test the predictability of the features of transgression, multiple regression and stepwise regression analysis were used. The results revealed that the features of transgression were important in forgiving others. Results of the multiple regression showed that the features of transgression significantly predicted forgiveness of others and accounted for 10% of the variance. Stepwise regression analysis showed that “responsibility”, “the outcomes of transgression” and “transgression whom it was made” were significant predictors of forgiveness of others. The findings were discussed in comparison to those of existing literature.

Keywords

-

Hataya İlişkin Özelliklerin Başkalarını Affetmeyi Yordaması

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı, hataya ilişkin özelliklerinin başkalarını affetme ile ilişkisini anlamak ve hataya ilişkin özelliklerin başkalarını affetmeyi ne kadar yordadığını görmektir. Araştırmaya, 376 (196 kız, 180 erkek) üniversite öğrencisi katılmıştır. Araştırmada gerekli bilgileri toplamak amacı ile Heartland Affetme Ölçeği’nin Türkçe formu (Bugay ve Demir, 2010) ve bu çalışma için geliştirilen “Hataya İlişkin Özellikleri Değerlendirme Formu” kullanılmıştır. Bağımsız değişkenlerin affetme üzerindeki yordama gücünü görmek amacıyla çoklu regresyon analizi ve adımsal regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, öğrencilerin büyük bir çoğunluğu hata özelliklerinin affetmeyi çok etkilediğini belirtmiştir. Ayrıca hataya ilişkin özelliklerin üniversite öğrencilerinin başkalarını affetme düzeyinin %10’unu açıkladığı bulunmuştur. Üniversite öğrencilerinin affetme düzeylerini ilk sırada “hatadaki sorumluluk”, ikinci sırada “hatanın yol açtığı sonuçlar” ve son sırada ise “hatanın kimin tarafından yapıldığı”değişkenlerinin anlamlı olarak yordadığı görülmüştür. Sonuçlar ilgili alanyazını ışığında tartışılmıştır.

Keywords

affetme, başkalarını affetme, hata, hata özellikleri

References

• Fincham, F. D., Jackson, H. ve Beach, S. R. H. (2005). Transgression severity and forgiveness: Different moderators for objective and subjective severity. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 860-875.
• Freedman, S. R. ve Enright, R. D. (1996). Forgiveness as an intervention goal with incest Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 983-992.
• Girard, M. ve Mullet, E. (1997). Propensity to forgive in adolescents, young adults, older adults, and elderly people. Journal of Adult Development, 4, 209-220.
• Göregenli, M. (1997). The individualistic-collectivist tendencies in a Turkish sample. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology. 28(6), 787-794.
• Hall, J. H. ve Fincham, F. D. (2008). The temporal course of self–forgiveness. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27 (2), 174-202.
• Hargrave, T. D. ve Sells, J. N. (1997). The development of a forgiveness scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 23, 41-62.
• Hofstede, G. (1980).Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.,
• İmamoğlu, E. O., Küller, R., İmamoğlu, V. ve Küller, M. (1993). Social psychological worlds of Swedes and Turks in and around retirement. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 24(1), 26-41.
• Lawler-Row, K. A. ve Piferi, R. L. (2006). The forgiving personality: Describing a life well lived? Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1009-1020.
• Maltby, J., Day, L. ve Barber, L. (2004). Forgiveness and mental health variables: Interpreting the relationship using an adaptational-continuum model of personality and coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1629-1641.
• Maltby, J., Macaskill, A. ve Day, L. (2001). Failure to forgive self and others: A replication and extension of the relationship between forgiveness, personality, social desirability and general health. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 881-885.
• McCullough, M. E., Fincham, F. D. ve Tsang, J. A. (2003). Forgiveness, forbearance, and time: The temporal unfolding of transgression-related interpersonal motivations. Journal of Personality Psychology, 84, 540-557. and Social
• McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I. ve Thoresen, C. E. (2000). Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Guilford.
• McCullough, M. E. ve Witvliet, C. V. O. (2002). The psychology of forgiveness. In C. R. Snyder ve S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (446- 458). New York: Oxford University Press.
• McCullough, M. E.,Worthington, E. L. ve Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321-336.
• Ohbuchi, K., Kameda, M. ve Agarie, N. (1989). Apology as aggression control: Its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 219-227.
• Thompson, L. Y., Snyder, C. R., Hoffman, L., Michael, S. T., Rasmussen, H. N. ve Billings, L. S. (2005). Dispositional forgiveness of self, others, and situations. Journal of Personality, 73, 313-359.
• Thoresen, C. E., Luskin, F. ve Harris, A. H. S. (1998). Science and forgiveness interventions: Reflections and recommendations. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological speculations (163-192). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.
• Vangelisti, A. L. ve Young, S. L. (2000). When words hurt: The perceived intentionality on interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 393-425.
• Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility. New York: Guilford.
• Weiner, B., Graham, S., Peter, O. ve Zmuidinas, M. (1991). Public confession and forgiveness. Journal of Personality, 59, 281-312.
• Worthington, E. L. Jr. (1998). Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological perspectives. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.
• Worthington, E. L., Jr. ve Wade, N. G. (1999). The social psychology of unforgiveness and forgiveness implications for clinical practice. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 385-418. and
• Ysseldyk, R., Matheson, K. ve Anisman, H. (2007). Rumination: Bridging a gap between forgivingness, vengefulness, and psychological health. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1573-1584.