Self-Esteem, Attachment, Gender Roles and Social Approval as Predictors of the Attitudes Toward Dating Violence

Year 2020, Volume: 10 Issue: 56, 1 - 36, 31.03.2020

Rana Turan Baki Duy

Abstract

The main purpose of the current research was to investigate the predictive role of gender roles, attachment, self-esteem and social approval in attitudes toward dating violence among college students. The participants of the study were 842 college students studying at different faculties of Anadolu University. The instruments of the study were The Intimate Partner Violence Attitude Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, the Gender Roles Attitudes Scale, Experience in Close Relationships Inventory-II, Social Confirmation Scale and Personal Information Form developed by the researcher was used to collect the data of the study. T-test, ANOVA, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient, and hierarchical regression anlaysis methods were empolyedto analyze the data and descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation coefficients were computed. Gender comparisons showed that male college students had higher scores in abuse, and control dimensions as well as the total score. Findings of the hierarchical regression anlaysis yielded thatgender role attittudes had predictive role in all dimensions of dating violence attitudes. As avoidant attachment dimensionsignificantly predicted violence dimension of dating violence, anxious attachment dimension significantly predicted abuse and control dimensions. Futhermore, self-esteem significanlty predictedcontrol dimension. Findings of the study are discussed under the light of the current literatüre, and sugesstions are.

Keywords

Dating violence, Attachment, Gender roles, Self-esteem, College students

Flört Şiddetine Yönelik Tutumların Yordayıcıları Olarak Benlik Saygısı, Bağlanma, Toplumsal Cinsiyet Rolleri ve Sosyal Onay İhtiyacı

Abstract

Bu araştırmada, toplumsal cinsiyet rolleri tutumu, bağlanma boyutları, benlik sayıgısı ve sosyal onay ihtiyacının romantik ilişkide şiddete yönelik tutumları yordayıcı rolünün incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu Anadolu Üniversitesi’ndeki 842 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın verilerini toplamak için Yakın İlişkilerde Şiddete Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği-Gözden Geçirilmiş Formu, Rosenberg Benlik Saygısı Ölçeği, Toplumsal Cinsiyet Rolleri Tutum Ölçeği, Yakın İlişkilerde Yaşantılar Envanteri-II, Kişisel Bilgi Formu ve Sosyal Onay Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde betimleyici istatistikler, t-testi, ANOVA, Pearson Momentler Çarpımı Korelasyonu ve Doğrusal Çoklu Hiyerarşik Regresyon analizinden yararlanılmıştır. Analizler sonucunda, flört şiddeti tutum puanının şiddet alt boyutunun kadın ve erkek üniversite öğrencilerinde farklılaşmadığı; istismar, kontrol alt boyutları ve toplam şiddet düzeyinin erkeklerde daha fazla olduğu bulunmuştur. Hiyerarşik regresyon analizleri sonucunda, toplumsal cinsiyet rollerine yönelik tutumların flört şiddetine yönelik tutumların yordayıcısı olduğu; bağlanma boyutlarından kaçınan bağlanmanın, flört şiddetinin şiddet alt boyutunu; kaygılı bağlanmanın ise istismar ve kontrol alt boyutunu yordadığı bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, benlik saygısı değişkeninin flört şiddetinin kontrol alt boyutunu anlamlı düzeyde yordadığı bulunmuştur. Bu bulgular alanyazındaki bulgular çerçevesinde tartışılıp önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Keywords

Flört şiddeti, Bağlanma, Toplumsal cinsiyet rolleri, Benlik saygısı, Üniversite öğrencileri

References

• Aslan, D., Vefikuluçay, D., Zeyneloğlu, S., Erdost, T., & Temel, F. (2008). Ankara’da iki Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu’nun birinci ve dördüncü sınıflarında okuyan öğrencilerin flört şiddetine maruz kalma, flört ilişkilerinde şiddet uygulama durumlarının ve bu konudaki görüşlerinin saptanması araştırması. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kadın Sorunları Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi.
• Ackard, D.M., Neumark-Sztainer, D., & Hannan, P. (2003). Dating violence among a nationally representative sample of adolescent girls and boys: Associations with behavioral and mental health. The Journal of Gender-specific Medicine: JGSM: The Official Journal of the Partnership for Women's Health at Columbia,6(3), 39-48.
• Atakay, C. (2014). Romantik yakın ilişkilerde şiddetin öncülleri. Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi, 2(3), 1-9.
• Bartholomew, K., & Allison, C. J. (2006). An Attachment Perspective on Abusive Dynamics in Intimate Relationships. In M. Mikulincer & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Dynamics of romantic love: Attachment, caregiving, and sex(pp. 102-127). New York: Guilford Press.
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for ınterpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 177(3), 497-529.
• Betz, C. (2007). Teen dating violence: an unrecognized health care need. Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children & Families, 22(6), 427-429.
• Blazina, C., & Watkins Jr, C. E. (1996). Masculine gender role conflict: Effects on college men's psychological well-being, chemical substance usage, and attitudes towards helpseeking. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(4), 461-465
• Bond, S. B., & Bond, M. (2004). Attachment styles and violence within couples. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 192(12), 857-863.
• Burnett, J. W., Anderson, W. P., & Heppner, P. P. (1995). Gender roles and self esteem: A consideration of environmental factors. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73(3), 323-326.
• Buunk, B. P. (1997). Personality, birth order and attachment styles as related to various types of jealousy. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 997-1006. doi:10.1016/S0191- 8869(97)00136-0
• Campbell, J. C. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. The Lancet,359(13), 1331-1336.
• Capezza, N. M., Schumacher, E. C., & Brady, B. C. (2015). Trends in intimate partner violence services provided by substance abuse treatment facilities: Findings from a national sample. Journal of Family Violence, 30(1), 85-91.
• Coker, A. L., Davis, K. E., Arias, I., Desai, S., Sanderson, M., Brandt, H.M., & Smith, P. H. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine,23(4), 260-268.
• Collins, N. L.,& Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 644-663.
• Conroy, N. E. (2013). Rethinking adolescent peer sexual harassment: Contributions of feminist theory. Journal of School Violence, 12(4), 340-356.
• Çelikkaleli, Ö. & Avcı, R. (2016). Üniversite öğrencilerinin cinsiyet ve toplumsal cinsiyet rollerine göre bağlanma biçimlerinin incelenmesi. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 4(7), 103-125.
• Çuhadaroğlu, F. (1986). Adolesanlarda benlik saygısı. (Yayınlanmamış Uzmanlık Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Doumas, D. M., Pearson, C. L., Elgin, J. E., & McKinley, L. L. (2008). Adult attachment as a risk factor for intimate partner violence: the “mispairing” of partners' attachment styles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(5), 616-634.
• Dutton, M. A. (1993). Understanding women's responses to domestic violence: A redefinition of battered woman syndrome. Hofstra Law Review, 21(4), 2.
• Dutton, D. G. (1999). Traumatic origins of intimate rage. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 4(4), 431-447.
• Eaton A. A., & Rose S. (2011). Has dating become more egalitarian? A 35 year review using sex roles. Sex Roles,64,843–862.
• Fincham, F. D., Cui, M., Braithwaite, S. R., & Pasley, K. (2008). Attitudes towards intimate partner violence in dating relationships. Psychological Assessment, 20, 260-269.
• Flake, T. A., Barros, C., Schraiber, L. B., & Menezes, P. R. (2013). Intimate partner violence among undergraduate students of two universities of the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 16, 801-816.
• Foo, L. & Margolin, G. (1995). A multivariate investigation of dating aggression. Journal of Family Violence,10(4), 351-377.
• Foshee, V. A. (1996). Gender differences in adolescent dating abuse prevalence, types and injuries. Health Education Research, 11(3), 275-286.
• Foshee, V.A., Benefield, T., Suchindran, C., Ennett, S.T., Bauman, K.E., Karriker‐Jaffe, K.J. & Mathias, J. (2009). The development of four types of adolescent dating abuse and selected demographic correlates. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19(3), 380-400
• Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of selfreport measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350-365
• Furjman, W., & Schaffer, L. (2003). The role of romantic relationships in adolescent development. P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, Research, and practical implicationsiçinde (pp. 3- 22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
• Golding, J. M. (1999). Intimate partner violence as a risk factor for mental disorders: A metaanalysis. Journal of Family Violence, 14(2), 99-132.
• Gordon, K. C., Amer, Z., Lenger, K. A., Brem, M. J., Baucom, D. H., & Snyder, D. K. (2019). Forgiveness and the Dark Side of Intimate Relationships: Infidelity, Intimate Partner Violence, and Divorce. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. & N. G. Wade (Ed.), Handbook of Forgiveness (pp. 153-163). NY: Routledge.
• Gover, A. R. (2004). Risky lifestyles and dating violence: A theoretical test of violent victimization. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32(2), 171-180.
• Gracia, E., & Merlo, J. (2016). Intimate partner violence against women and the Nordic paradox. Social Science & Medicine, 157, 27-30.
• Guerrero, L. K. (1998). Attachment‐style differences in the experience and expression of romantic jealousy. Personal Relationships, 5(3), 273-291
• Guerrero, L. K., & Afifi, W. A. (1998). Communicative responses to jealousy as a function of self-esteem and relationship maintenance goals: A test of Bryson’s dual motivation model. Communication Reports, 11, 111–122.
• Güvenç, G. & Aktas, V. (2006). Ergenlik döneminde yas, toplumsal cinsiyet, bireysel ve ilişkisel tutumlar, benlik değeri ve yaşam becerilerine ilişkin algı arasındaki ilişkiler. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 21(57), 45-64.
• Hathaway, J. E., Mucci, L. A., Silverman, J. G., Brooks, D. R., Mathews, R., & Pavlos, C. A. (2000). Health status and health care use of Massachusetts women reporting partner abuse. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19(4), 302-307.
• Hazan, C.,& Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 1-22.
• Heise, L. (2011). What Works to Prevent Partner Violence? an Evidence Overview. STRIVE, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London.
• Heise, L., & Kotsadam, A. (2015). Cross-national and multilevel correlates of partner violence: an analysis of data from population-based surveys. The Lancet GlobalHealth 3(6), e332-e340.
• Herrero, J., & Rodríguez, F. J., & Torres, A. (2017). Acceptability of partner violence in 51 societies: The role of sexism and attitudes toward violence in social relationships. Violence Against Women, 23(3), 351-367.
• Hines, D. A., & Saudino, K. J. (2003). Gender differences in psychological, physical, and sexual aggression among college students using the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales. Violence and Victims, 18(2), 197.
• Humphreys, J., Lee, K., Neylan, T., & Marmar, C. (1999). Trauma history of sheltered battered women. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 20(4), 319-332.
• Huta, V. & Hawley, L. (2010). Psychological strengths and vulnerabilities: are they two ends of the same continuum or do they have independent relationships with well-being and illbeing? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(1), 71-93.
• Jewkes, R., Flood, M., & Lang, J. (2015). From work with men and boys to changes of social norms and reduction of inequities in gender relations: a conceptual shift in prevention of violence against women and girls. Lancet 385, 1580-1589.
• Karancı, N., Dirik, G., & Yorulmaz, O. (2007). Eysenck kişilik anketi-gözden geçirilmiş kısaltılmış formu’nun (EKA-GGK) Türkiye’de geçerlik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 18(3), 1-8.
• Karaşar, B. (2014). Öğretmen adaylarının bağlanma stilleri ve sosyal kaygı düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. Amasya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 27-49.
• Karaşar, B., & Öğülmüş, S. (2016). Sosyal onay ihtiyacı ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizi. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 17(1), 84-104. Karatay, G. D. G. (2018). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Flört Şiddetine İlişkin Tutum ve Davranışları. STED/Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi, 27(1), 62-71.
• Kepir-Savoly, D., Ulaş, Ö. & Demirtaş-Zorbaz, S. (2014). Üniversite öğrencilerinin çiftler arası şiddeti kabul düzeylerini etkileyen etmenler. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 5(42).173-183.
• Kesner, J. E., & McKenry, P. C. (1998). The role of childhood attachment factors in predicting male violence toward female intimates. Journal of Family Violence, 13(4), 417-432.
• Kılınçer, A.S. & Dost, M.T. (2015). Üniversite öğrencilerinin romantik ilişkilerinde algıladıkları istismar. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 5(42). 160-172.
• Koçak, Y. Ç. & Can, H. Ö. (2019). Flört Şiddeti: Tanımı, Sınıflaması ve Değerlendirmesi. Turkiye Klinikleri Obstetric-Women's Health and Diseases Nursing-Special Topics, 5(3), 43-53.
• Kuijpers, K. F., Van der Knaap, L. M., & Winkel, F. W. (2012). Risk of revictimization of intimate partner violence: The role of attachment, anger and violent behavior of the victim. Journal of Family Violence, 27(1), 33-44.
• Locke, B. D., & Mahalik, J. R. (2005). Examining masculinity norms, problem drinking, and athletic involvement as predictors of sexual aggression in college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(3), 279-283.
• Logan, T.K., Shannon, L., Cole, J. & Walker, R. (2006). The impact of differential patterns of physical violence and stalking on mental health and help-seeking among women with protective orders. Violence Against Women, 12(9), 866- 886
• Mahalik, J. R., Cournoyer, R. J., DeFranc, W., Cherry, M., & Napolitano, J. M. (1998). Men's gender role conflict and use of psychological defenses. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(3), 247-255.
• Makepeace, J. M. (1981). Courtship violence among college students. Family Relations, 30(1), 97- 102.
• Makepeace, J. M. (1983). Life events stress and courtship violence. Family Relations, 32(1), 101- 109.
• Makepeace, J. M. (1987). Social factor and victim-offender differences in courtship violence. Family Relations, 36(1), 87-91.
• Matud, M. P. (2007). Dating violence and domestic violence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(4), 295-297.
• Meetoo, V., & Mirza, H.S. (2007). There is nothing ‘honourable’about honour killings: Gender, violence and the limits of multiculturalism. Women's Studies International Forum, 30(3), 187- 200.
• Muñoz-Rivas, M. J., Graña, J. L., O’Leary, K. D., & González, M. P. (2007). Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: Prevalence, justification, and health consequences. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(4), 298-304.
• O‘Leary, K. D., Malone, J., & Tyree, A. (1994). Physical aggression in early marriage: Prerelationship and relationship effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 594– 602.
• O'campo, P., Kub, J., Woods, A., Garza, M., Jones, A. S., Gielen, A. C., & Campbell, J. (2006). Depression, PTSD, and comorbidity related to intimate partner violence in civilian and military women. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 6(2), 99-110.
• Orcutt, H. K., Garcia, M., & Pickett, S. M (2005). Female-perpetrated intimate partner violence and romantic attachment style in a college student sample. Violence and Victims, 20(3), 287–302.
• Ostrov, J. M., Crick, N. R., & Keating, C.F. (2005). Gender-biased perceptions of preschoolers’ behavior: how much is aggression and prosocial behavior in the eye of the beholder? Sex Roles, 52(5-6), 393-398.
• Öner, N. (1994). Türkiye’de kullanılan psikolojik testler: Bir başvuru kaynağı. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Papadakaki, M., Tzamalouka, G.S, Chatzifotiou, S., & Chilaoutakis, J. (2009). Seeking for risk factors of intimate partner violence in a Greek national sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(5), 732-750.
• Paulson, M. J., Coombs, R. H., & Landsverk, J. (1990). Youth who physically assault their parents. Journal of Family Violence, 5(2), 121-133.
• Pearson, C. L. (2006). Adult attachment as a risk factor for intimate partner violence. McNair Scholars Research Journal, 2(1), 41-46.
• Próspero, M. (2008). Effects of masculinity, sex, and control on different types of intimate partner violence perpetration. Journal of Family Violence, 23(7), 639-645.
• Reed, K. M., Hines, D. A., Armstrong, J. L., & Cameron, A. Y. (2015). Experimental evaluation of a bystander prevention program for sexual assault and dating violence. Psychology of Violence, 5(1), 95-102.
• Reyes, H. L. M., Foshee, V. A., Niolon, P. H., Reidy, D. E., & Hall, J. E. (2016). Gender role attitudes and male adolescent dating violence perpetration: Normative beliefs as moderators. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(2), 350-360.
• Roberts, N.,& Noller, P. (1998). The associations between adult attachment and couple violence: The role of communication patterns and relationship satisfaction. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 317-350). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Rodriguez, L. M., Dibello, A. M., Øverup, C. S., & Neighbors, C. (2015). The price of distrust: trust, anxious attachment, jealousy, and partner abuse. Partner Abuse, 6(3), 298-319.
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Sakarya, A. (2013). Üniversitede öğrenim gören gençlerde flörtte şiddet. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya.
• Saltzman, L., Fanslow, J. L., McMahon, P. M., & Shelley, G. A. (2002). Intimate partner violence surveillance: uniform definitions and recommended data elements, version 1.0. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control,1, 89-104.
• Santana, M. C., Raj, A., Decker, M. R., La Marche, A., & Silverman, J. G. (2006). Masculine gender roles associated with increased sexual risk and intimate partner violence perpetration among young adult men. Journal of Urban Health, 83(4), 575-585.
• Selçuk, E., Günaydın, G., Sümer, N., & Uysal, A. (2005). Yetişkin bağlanma boyutları için yeni bir ölçüm: Yakın ilişkilerde yaşantılar envanteri-II’nin Türk örnekleminde psikometrik açıdan değerlendirilmesi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 8(16), 1-13.
• Selçuk, K. T., Avcı, D., & Mercan, Y. (2018). Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Flört Şiddetine Maruziyet: Flört Şiddetine Yönelik Tutumların ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Algısının Şiddete Maruziyet ile İlişkisi. ACU Sağlık Bil Derg, 9(3), 302-8.
• Smith, P. H., White, J. W., & Holland, L. J. (2003). A longitudinal perspective on dating violence among adolescent and college-age women. American Journal of Public Health, 93(7), 1104-1109.
• Spriggs, A. L., Halpern, C. T., Herring, A. H., & Schoenbach, V. J. (2009). Family and school socioeconomic disadvantage: Interactive influences on adolescent dating violence victimization. Social Science & Medicine, 68(11), 1956-1965.
• Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283-316.
• Sugarman, C. B. & Hotaling, G. T. (1997). Intimate violence and social desirability: a metaanalytic review. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 275-290.
• Taylor, C. A.,& Sorenson, S. B. (2004). Injunctive social norms of adults regarding teen dating violence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 34(6), 468-479.
• Toplu-Demirtaş, E., Murray, C. & Hatipoglu-Sümer, Z. (2018). Attachment insecurity and restrictive engulfment in college student relationships: The mediating role of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-11- 2017-0333. (Erişim tarihi: 12.05.2018).
• Umana, J. E., Fawole, O. I., & Adeoye, I. A. (2014). Prevalence and correlates of intimate partner violence towards female students of the University of Ibadan, Nigeria. BMC Women's Health, 14(1), 131.
• Vezina, J., & Hebert, M. (2007). Risk factors for victimization in romantic relationships of young women: A review of empirical studies and implications for prevention. Trauma, Violence ve Abuse, 8(1), 33-66.
• Visschers, J., Jaspaert, E., & Vervaeke, G. (2015). Social desirability in intimate partner violence and relationship satisfaction reports: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 1401-1420. http://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515588922.
• Weiss, J., & Sampson, H.(1986). The psychoanalytic process: theory, clinical observation: An Ampirical Research. New York: Guilford press.
• Wekerle, C., & Wolfe, D. A. (1998). The role of child maltreatment and attachment style in adolescent relationship violence. Development & Psychopathology, 10(3), 571-586.
• Zeyneloğlu, S., & Terzioğlu, F. (2011). Toplumsal cinsiyet rolleri tutum ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve psikometrik özellikleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40, 409-420
• Zorrilla, B., Pires, M., Lasheras, L., Morant, C., Seoane, L., Sanchez, L. M., & Durbán, M. (2009). Intimate partner violence: last year prevalence and association with socioeconomic factors among women in Madrid, Spain. European Journal of Public Health, 20(2),169-175.