Turkish Adaptation of the Relationship Sabotage Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study

Year 2023, Volume: 13 Issue: 70, 345 - 359, 30.09.2023

Rana Turan , İbrahim Yıldırım

https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1266739.6

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to adapt the ‘Relationship Sabotage Scale' (RSS), whose validity and reliability studies were conducted by Peel and Caltabiano (2021), adapting it to Turkish. The adaptation process of the scale was carried out by going through various stages in which the participants were university students. In the first stage of the research, 32 university students were reached for language equivalence study. At the next stage, the study group for the validity and reliability study of the research consists of a total of 266 university students, 150 (56%) female and 116 (44%) male, studying at various faculties in the fall semester of the 2022-2023 academic year. The construct validity of the RSS was tested with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Confirmatory factor analysis results show that the 12-item and three-factor structure of the original scale was confirmed. It was observed that the item factor loads of the scale ranged from .56 to .95. According to the findings, it is seen that the scale tested with CFA has sufficient goodness-of-fit indices. For the reliability of the scale, the Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient was calculated; At the end of the analyzes, the total Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was found .81, while the Cronbach alpha (α) internal consistency coefficients for the sub-dimensions ranged from .81 to .85. The findings obtained as a result of the study show that RSS is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used in evaluating the self-sabotage of individuals in their romantic relationships.

Keywords

self-sabotage in relationships, romantic relationships, university students, scale adaptation, validity, reliability

References

• Akın, A., Abacı, R., & Akın, Ü. (2011). Self-Handicapping: A Conceptual Analysis. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(3).
• Antonucci, T. C., Lansford, J. E., & Akiyama, H. (2001). Impact of positive and negative aspects of marital relationships and friendships on well-being of older adults. Applied Developmental Science, 5(2), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0502_2
• Avcı, Ö. H. (2014). Development of dyadic relationship scale. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 56(56), 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2014.56.6
• Ayduk, O., Downey, G., Testa, A., Yen, Y., & Shoda, Y. (1999). Does rejection elicit hostility in rejection sensitive women? Social Cognition, 17(2), 245-271.
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (ss. 136–162). CA: Sage.
• Burunat, E. (2019). Love is a physiological motivation (like hunger, thirst, sleep or sex). Medical hypotheses, 129, 109225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2019.05.011
• Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2001). Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS Release 10 For Windows: A Guide For Social Scientists. Routledge.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2017). Eğitimde Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri [Research Methods in Education]. Pegem Academy.
• Byrne, B.M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, And Programming. 2nd ed. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group
• Cassidy, J. (2000). Adult romantic attachments: A development perspective on individual differences. Review of General Psychology, 4, 111-131.
• Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.73
• Covington, M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 171-200.
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik: SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları [Multivariate Statistics for Social Sciences: SPSS and LISREL Applications] (Vol. 2). Pegem Academy.
• Downey, G., Bonica, C., & Rincon, C. (1999). Rejection sensitivity and adolescent romantic relationships. The Development of Romantic Relationships in Adolescence, 148-174.
• Downey, G., Freitas, A. L., Michaelis, B., & Khouri, H. (1998). The self-fulfilling prophecy in close relationships: rejection sensitivity and rejection by romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 545.
• Downey, G., Khouri, H., & Feldman, S. I. (1997). Early interpersonal trauma and later adjustment: The mediational role of rejection sensitivity. In D. Cicchetti and S. L. Toth (Eds.), Developmental Perspectives on Trauma: Theory, Research, And İntervention (pp. 85–114). University of Rochester Press
• Dush, C. M. K., & Taylor, M. G. (2012). Trajectories of marital conflict across the life course: Predictors and interactions with marital happiness trajectories. Journal of Family Issues, 33(3), 341. doi: 10.1177/0192513X11409684
• Esch, T., & Stefano, G. B. (2005). The neurobiology of love. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 26(3), 175-192.
• Feeney, J., & Fitzgerald, J. (2019). Attachment, conflict and relationship quality: Laboratory-based and clinical insights. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 127-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.04.002
• Feldman, S., & Downey, G. (1994). Rejection sensitivity as a mediator of the impact of childhood exposure to family violence on adult attachment behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 6(1), 231-247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400005976
• Fincham, F. D., & Linfield, K. J. (1997). A new look at marital quality: Can spouses feel positive and negative about their marriage? Journal of Family Psychology, 11(4), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.11.4.489-502
• Fromm, E. (1995). Sevme Sanatı [The Art of Love]. (Y. Salman, Trans.). İstanbul: Payel.
• Gottman, J. M. (1993). A theory of marital dissolution and stability. Journal of Family Psychology, 7(1), 57.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Hambleton, R. K., & Li, S. (2005). Translation and adaptation issues and methods for educational and psychological tests. In C. L. Frisby and C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Comprehensive Handbook Of Multicultural School Psychology (pp. 881–903). John Wiley and Sons, Inc..
• Harper, M. S., Dickson, J. W., & Welsh, D. P. (2006). Self-silencing and rejection sensitivity in adolescent romantic relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 435-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9048-3
• Haydon, K. C., Jonestrask, C., Guhn-Knight, H., & Salvatore, J. E. (2017). The dyadic construction of romantic conflict recovery sabotage. Journal of social and personal relationships, 34(6), 915-935. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516661766
• Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52,511-524
• Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 1-22.
• Heavey, C. L., Layne, C., & Christensen, A. (1993). Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: a replication and extension. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(1), 16.
• Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393-416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485
• Hewitt, P. L. (2020). Perfecting, belonging, and repairing: A dynamic-relational approach to perfectionism. Canadian Psychology, 61(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000209
• Jiang, Y., & Tiliopoulos, N. (2014). Individual differences in adult attachment and reinforcement sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 205-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.022
• Karahan, A. S. (2021). Kendini Sabote Etmenin Yakın Kişilerarası İlişkiler Açısından Ele Alınması [Consideration of Self-Sabotage Regarding Close Relationships]. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(42), 5876-5896. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.893279
• Kearns, A. E., Khosla, S., & Kostenuik, P. J. (2008). Receptor activator of nuclear factor κb ligand and osteoprotegerin regulation of bone remodeling in health and disease. Endocrine Reviews, 29(2), 155-192. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2007-0014
• Kline, R. B. (2004). Beyond Significance Testing: Reforming Data Analysis Methods in Behavioral Research.  DC:American Psychological Association. 
• Kline, R. B. (2009). Becoming a Behavioral Science Researcher: A Guide to Producing Research That Matters. Guilford Press.
• Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Press.
• Lavner, J. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (2010). Patterns of change in marital satisfaction over the newlywed years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5), 1171-1187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00757.x
• Lemay Jr, E. P., & Spongberg, K. (2015). Perceiving and wanting to be valued by others: implications for cognition, motivation, and behavior in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality, 83(4), 464-478. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12122
• Lockhart, G., Phillips, S., Bolland, A., Delgado, M., Tietjen, J., & Bolland, J. (2017). Prospective relations among low-income African American adolescents’ maternal attachment security, self-worth, and risk behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 33. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00033
• Maatta, S., Stattin, H., & Nurmi, J. E. (2002). Achievement strategies at school: Types and correlates. Journal of Adolescence, 25, 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2001.0447
• MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W. and Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130.
• Marazziti, D., & Baroni, S. (2012). Romantic love: the mystery of its biological roots. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 9(1).
• Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., Williamson, A., & Debus, R. L. (2003). Self-handicapping, defensive pessimism, and goal orientation: A qualitative study of university students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 617. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.617
• Mattingly, B. A., & Clark, E. M. (2012). Weakening relationships we try to preserve: Motivated sacrifice, attachment, and relationship quality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(2), 373-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00893.x
• Meyer, D. D., Jones, M., Rorer, A., & Maxwell, K. (2015). Examining the associations among attachment, affective state, and romantic relationship quality. The Family Journal, 23(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480714547698
• Murotmusaev, К. B., Dzhelyalov, М. Z., & Boltaeva, М. J. (2021). Psychological aspects of human health and the power of love. The American Journal of Applied sciences, 3(02), 73-77. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajas/Volume03Issue02-07
• Myers, D. C. (2003). 19 Close Relationships and Quality of Life (p. 374). Russell Sage Foundation.
• Pateraki, E., & Roussi, P. (2013). Marital quality and well-being: The role of gender, marital duration, social support and cultural context. A Positive Psychology Perspective on Quality of Life, 125-145.
• Peel, R., McBain, K., Caltabiano, N., & Buckby, B. (2017, January). How is self-sabotage presented in romantic relationships? In 16th Australian Psychological Society Psychology of Relationships Interest Group National Conference (APS-PORIG). University of Southern Queensland.
• Peel, R., Caltabiano, N., Buckby, B., & McBain, K. (2019). Defining romantic self-sabotage: A thematic analysis of interviews with practising psychologists. Journal of Relationships Research, 10, e16. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2019.7
• Peel, R. (2020). Relationship sabotage: an attachment and goal-orientation perspective on seeking love yet failing to maintain romantic relationships (Publication No. 65696) [Doctoral dissertation, James Cook University]. James Cook University. http://dx.doi.org/10.25903/0vv9-yq58
• Peel, R., & Caltabiano, N. (2021). The relationship sabotage scale: An evaluation of factor analyses and constructive validity. BMC Psychology, 9, 1-17.
• Peel, R., & Caltabiano, N. (2021). Why do we sabotage love? A thematic analysis of lived experiences of relationship breakdown and maintenance. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy, 20(2), 99-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2020.1795039
• Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making Sense of Factor Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis For İnstrument Development in Health Care Research. SAGE Publications
• Purdie, V., & Downey, G. (2000). Rejection sensitivity and adolescent girls' vulnerability to relationship-centered difficulties. Child Maltreatment, 5(4), 338-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559500005004005
• Reiner, I., & Spangler, G. (2013). Representations of early attachment experiences and personality in adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 20, 38-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-013-9154-x
• Resnick, S. (2018). Body-to-body intimacy: Transformation through love, sex, and neurobiology. Routledge.
• Rubin, A., & Babbie, E.R. (2008). Research Methods for Social Work. Thomson Brooks/Cole. 6th edn
• Rusk, N., & Rothbaum, F. (2010). From stress to learning: Attachment theory meets goal orientation Theory. Review of General Psychology, 14(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018123
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
• Shek, D. T. (1995). Marital quality and psychological well-being of married adults in a Chinese context. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 156(1), 45-56.
• Slade, R. (2020). Relationship Sabotage in Adults with Low Self-Esteem from Attachment Trauma in Childhood. Family Perspectives, 1(1), Article 11.
• Stewart, M. A., & De George-Walker, L. (2014). Self-handicapping, perfectionism, locus of control and self-efficacy: A path model. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 160-164.
• Şeker, H., & Gençdoğan, B. (2014). Psikolojide ve Eğitimde Ölçme Aracı Geliştirme [Measurement Tool Development in Psychology and Education] (2nd ed.). Nobel.
• Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling. In: B. G. Tabachnick, and L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson Education.
• Voss, K., Markiewicz, D., & Doyle, A. B. (1999). Friendship, marriage and self-esteem. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(1), 103-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407599161006
• Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier And Better Off Financially. Doubleday.
• Warner, S., & Moore, S. (2004). Excuses, excuses: Self-handicapping in an Australian adolescent sample. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 271-281.
• Whisman, M.A., Sheldon, C., & Goering, P. (2000). Psychiatric disorders and dissatisfaction with social relationships: Does type of relationship matter? Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 109(4), 803–808. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.109.4.803
• Wickrama, K. A. S., Lorenz, F. O., Conger, R. D. and Elder Jr, G. H. (1997). Marital quality and physical illness: A latent growth curve analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 143-155. https://doi.org/10.2307/353668
• Zuckerman, M., & Tsai, F. F. (2005). Costs of self‐handicapping. Journal of Personality, 73(2), 411-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00314.x