Challenges in Developing Maritime Safety Training Courses in Georgian MET Centers

Abstract

This paper investigates the current state and perceives effectiveness of maritime safety trainings by active seafarers. The study is based on a structured survey of 307 seafarers holding Certificates of Competency (CoC) or Certificates of Proficiency (CoP) issued in Georgia and serving in various ranks and departments aboard ocean-going merchant vessels. The research highlights seafarers’ individual perceptions regarding onboard safety protocols, the adequacy of safety training programs, preparedness for emergency situations, and the needs to develop additional professional competencies. The study underscores the critical importance of the human element in maritime safety and emphasizes the essential role of safety drills in decreasing maritime accidents both on board ships and at maritime training centers. The findings reveal a generally positive evaluation of compliance with safety requirements and the overall effectiveness of existing trainings. However, certain weaknesses remain, particularly regarding the practical components of training, the scheduling of courses and the quality of training content. In addition, respondents expressed a strong demand for supplementary training programs, especially in Maritime English, maritime law, and leadership development. The study concludes with recommendations for MET institutions, aiming to enhance training delivery, ensure alignment with international regulatory frameworks and more effectively respond to the evolving needs of seafarers operating in dynamic maritime environments.

Keywords

• Traing of Seafarer
• maritime safety
• trainig course
• human factor
• shipping
• met

References

1. De Melo, G. (2024, June). Safety at sea and maritime environment protection with special references to training needs for the emerging new fuels. In Maritime Transport Conference (No. 10).
2. Fan, S., Blanco-Davis, E., Fairclough, S., Zhang, J., Yan, X., Wang, J., Yang, Z. (2023). Incorporation of seafarer psychological factors into maritime safety assessment. Ocean & Coastal Management, 237: 106515.
3. Hasanspahić, N., Vujičić, S., Frančić, V., Čampara, L. (2021a). The Role of the Human Factor in Marine Accidents, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(3): 261. doi: 10.3390/jmse9030261.
4. Hasanspahić, N., Frančić, V., Vujičić, S., Mandušić, M. (2021b). Safety leadership as a means for safe and sustainable shipping. Sustainability, 13(14), 7841.
5. Hickethier, A.F., Yang, C.C. (2023). An Analysis of Causes Related to Human Factors in Maritime Accidents. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 165(A2): 125-134.
6. Macrae, C. (2009). Human factors at sea: common patterns of error in groundings and collisions. Maritime Policy & Management, 36(1): 21-38.
7. Markopoulos, E., Luimula, M. (2020). Immersive safe oceans technology: Developing virtual onboard training episodes for maritime safety. Future Internet, 12(5), 80.
8. Maternová, A., Materna, M., Dávid, A., Török, A., Švábová, L. (2023). Human error analysis and fatality prediction in maritime accidents. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(12): 2287.

9. Rodriguez, A.J., Hubbard, M.C. (1998). International Safety Management (ISM) Code: a new level of uniformity. Tulane Law Review, 73, 1585.
10. Safety Analysis of EMCIP Data, (2022). Analysis of Navigation Accidents”. Summary Report. European Maritime Safety Agency. Accessed Date: 19/06/2025, https://safety4sea.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/EMSA-EMCIP-Navigation-Accidents-2022_09.pdf is retrieved.
11. Safety and Shipping Review Insights, (2024). Allianz Commercial, Accessed Date: 22/06/2025, https://commercial.allianz.com/news-and-insights/reports/shipping-safety.html; is retrieved.
12. United Nations Trade, & Development (UNCTAD). (2024). Review of Maritime Transport 2024: Navigating Maritime Chokepoints. Stylus Publishing, LLC, Accessed Date:23/06/2025, https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2024overview_en.pdf is retrieved.
13. Wróbel, K. (2021). Searching for the origins of the myth: 80% human error impact on maritime safety. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 216, 107942.