Muscular activation differences between professional and amateur soccer players during countermovement jump
Öz
The purpose of this study was to compare the muscular activation strategies of professional and amateur soccer players during countermovement jump. Twenty male soccer players, consisting of 10 amateurs (age: 22.9±3.1 year, training status: 12.2±3.1 year) and 10 professionals (age: 22.2±2.5year, training status: 13.7±2.7year) volunteered to participate in the study. Dominant leg surface electromyography activities of five muscles were recorded during countermovement jump. In addition, isokinetic strength of knee flexor and extensors, peak and average power were calculated. According to our results, the average countermovement jump heights were calculated for amateurs (37.1±3.12 cm) and professionals (41.3±2.58 cm). Furthermore, gastrocnemius muscle activation occurred significantly higher in professional soccer players than that of the amateur soccer players during propulsion (between -150ms and -120ms) and flight phase (between 150ms and 270ms) (p<0,05). Rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis and biceps femoris muscles contraction values were almost similar in both amateur and professional soccer players which their age, training year and muscle strengths are similar. It could be concluded that pre-activation and post landing phase are important for the jumping performance for both groups; however; the high activation of gastrocnemious muscle could be one of the important determinant for the superior jump performance
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL, Magnusson P, Dyhre- Poulsen P. Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. Journal of Applied Phycology, 2002; 93:1318-1326.
- Babic J, Lenaric J. Vertical Jump: Biomechanical Analysis and Simulation Study Humanoid Robots. Slovenia: Publisher I- Tech Education and Publishing, 2007; 552-565.
- Baratta R, Solomonow M, Zhou BH, Letson D, Chuinard R, D’Am- brosia R. Muscular coactivation: the role of the antagonist muscula- ture in maintaining knee stability. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1988; 16: 113-22.
- Bobbert MF, Gerritsen KG, Litjens MC, Van Soest AJ. Why is countermovement jump height greater than squat jump height? Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1996; 28(11): 1402-1412.
- Bosco C, Viitasalo JT. Potentiation of myoelectrical activity of human muscles in vertical jumps. Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1982; 22: 549-562.
- Canavan PK, Vescovi JD. Evaluation of power prediction equations: peak vertical jumping power in women. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2004; 36(9): 1589-1593.
- Carlock JM, Smith SL, Hartman MJ, Morris RT, Ciroslan DA, Pierce KC, Newton RU, Harman EA, Sands WA, Stone MH. The relationship between vertical jump power estimates and weightlifting ability: a field-test approach. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2004; 18(3): 534-539.
- Cerrah AO, Onarici Gungor E, Soylu AR, Ertan H, Lees A, Bayrak C. Muscular Activation patterns during the Soccer In- Step Kick. Isokinetics and Exercise Science, 2011; 19: 181-190.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
-
Yayımlanma Tarihi
28 Ağustos 2014
Gönderilme Tarihi
10 Haziran 2014
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2014 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2
Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi (TJSE)