Kinematic comparison between single and double-leg jump landings in sagittal plane for male hand ball players
Öz
Double
and single leg jump (SL) landing activities are considered stressful tasks for
handball players. Most of the previous
researches focused on kinetic analysis of these activities rather than
kinematic analysis. Also, there is a lack of comparative studies that were
performed between the two types of activities. The main aim of this study is to
perform lower extremity kinematic analysis to find the kinematic differences
between single and double-leg jump (DL) landings in the sagittal plane (SP),in male handball players.
The lower extremity kinematics were measured in 15elite male handball
players(while performing SL and DL landings), by using three-dimensional motion
analysis system (VICON). The results revealed statistically significant
difference between the lower limb kinematics of SPSL and SPDL.
During the SPDL, the hip and knee flexion angles increased more than
those in SPSL, while there was more knee adduction with internal
rotation stress in SPSL than in SPDL(P< .05).
The hip and knee flexion angles in the SPDL showed moderate
association with those during the SPSL(R2, 0.49
and 0.44 respectively). In addition, the hip abduction in the SPDL
showed moderate association with those during the SPSL (R2,
0.37). But, hip internal rotation, knee adduction,
and knee internal rotation in the SPDL showed weak association with those during the SPSL
(R2 = 0.02-0.041; P ˃ .05).The double-leg jump
landing maybe considered as a less stressful
task for the lower limb joints than the single-leg jump landing activity.
As a clinical benefit, the double-leg jump landing activity may be used to
screen the ACL injury risk in certain
planes of joint motion.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Beaulieu ML, Mclean SG. Sex-dimorphic landing mechanics and their role within the noncontact ACL injury mechanism : evidence, limitations and directions. Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy & Technology, 2012; 4:10.
- Breighner RE, Hardy DM, Shultz SJ. Hip extension, knee flexion paradox: A new mechanism for non-contact ACL injury. Journal of Biomechanics, 2011; 44: 577-585.
- Cheatham SA, Johnson DL, Cheatham SA, Johnson DL. Current Concepts in ACL Injuries Current Concepts in ACL Injuries. The Physician and Sports Medicine, 2016; 38(3).
- Dirx M, Bouter LM, Ma GHDG. A etiology of handball injuries : a case-control study. Br J Sports Med, 1992;26(3): 3–6.
- From S, Team F. Mechanisms for noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2010; 38(11).
- Goetschius BJ, Smith HC, Vacek PM, Holterman LA, Sandra J, Tourville TW, et al. Application of a clinic-based algorithm as a tool to identify female athletes at risk for anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective cohort study with a nested, matched case-control analysis. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2012; 40(9): 1978-84.
- Harty CM, Dupont CE, Chmielewski TL, Mizner RL. Intertask comparison of frontal plane knee position and moment in female athletes during three distinct movement tasks. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2011; 98–105.
- Hewett TE, Torg JS, Boden BP. Video analysis of trunk and knee motion during non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury in female athletes: lateral trunk and knee abduction motion are combined components of the injury mechanism A. NIH Public Access, 2014; 43(6): 417–22.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
-
Yazarlar
Mariam A. Ameer
Bu kişi benim
Yayımlanma Tarihi
31 Aralık 2016
Gönderilme Tarihi
23 Ocak 2017
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2016 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3
Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi (TJSE)