Ulaşım Yoksulluğu Literatürünün Bibliyometrik Profili: Vosviewer ile Ağ Analizi

Öz

Kentlerde sunulan ulaşım hizmetlerinin kapsayıcılığı, etkin kullanımı ve bu ulaşım sistemlerine şehir sakinlerinin erişimi kentlerdeki yaşam kalitesi açısından önemlidir. Ulaşım hizmetlerine erişim özellikle düşük gelirli gruplar, yaşlılar ve engelliler gibi dezavantajlı gruplar için sosyal erişimi artıran önemli bir etkendir. Bu bakımdan ulaşım faaliyetleri kentsel hizmetlere erişimi artırırken aynı zamanda sosyal adaleti de sağlamaktadır. Son yıllarda ulaşım alanında yapılan akademik çalışmalar arasına “ulaşım yoksulluğu” kavramı ile ilgili çalışmaların eklendiği görülmektedir. Araştırmanın amacı ulaşım yoksulluğu alanına ait uluslararası literatürün mevcut durumunu ve gelişimini incelemektir. Araştırmanın veri setini Web of Science veri tabanından belirli konu başlıkları taranarak oluşturulan 411 adet çeşitli türde yapılan akademik çalışmalar oluşturmuştur. Ağ analizi yöntemi VOSviewer programı kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Araştırmada ulaşım yoksulluğu alanındaki çalışmalara ait ülke ve yazar ağ analizi, çalışmaların etki durumu, atıf analizi, dönemsel olarak sık kullanılan anahtar kelimeler incelenmiştir. Bu inceleme sonucunda ilgili alanda çalışmaların giderek arttığı görülmüştür. En etkili çalışmalar İngiltere, Avustralya ve Almanya gibi sosyal politikalara önem verilen ülkelerde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ulaşım yoksulluğu alanında yapılan mevcut araştırmalar literatüre önemli katkılar sunmaktadır. Günümüzde engelli bireyler, yaşlılar, çocuklar, cinsiyet ayrımının belirgin olduğu toplumlarda kadınlar, toplu taşıma kullanan bebek sahibi kadınlar ile ilgili çalışmaların yetersiz olduğu da görülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ulaşım
• ulaşım yoksulluğu
• bibliyometrik analiz
• ağ analizi

Bibliometric Profile of Transportation Poverty Literature: Network Analysis with Vosviewer

Öz

The inclusiveness and efficient use of transport services provided in cities and the access of city dwellers to these transport systems are important for the quality of life in cities. Access to transport services is an important factor that increases social access, especially for disadvantaged groups such as low-income groups, the elderly, and the disabled. In this respect, while transport activities increase access to urban services, they also ensure social justice. In recent years, studies on the concept of ‘transport poverty’ have been added to the academic studies on transport. The aim of this research is to examine the current status and development of the international literature on transport poverty. The research data set consisted of 411 academic studies of various types created by searching specific topics from the Web of Science database. The network analysis method was performed using the VOSviewer program. In the research, country and author network analysis of the studies in the field of transport poverty, impact status of the studies, citation analysis, and periodically frequently used keywords were examined. As a result of this analysis, it was observed that the number of studies in the related field has been increasing gradually. The most effective studies were carried out in countries where social policies are given importance, such as England, Australia and Germany. Existing studies in the field of transport poverty make important contributions to the literature. Today, it is also seen that there are insufficient studies on disabled individuals, the elderly, children, women in societies where gender discrimination is evident, and women with babies using public transportation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• transport
• transport poverty
• bibliometric analysis
• network analysis

Kaynakça

1. Abe, T., Kitamura, A., Seino, S., Yokoyama, Y., Amano, H., Taniguchi, Y. ve Shinkai, S. (2020). Frailty status and transport disadvantage: Comparison of older adults’ travel behaviours between metropolitan, suburban, and rural areas of Japan. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(17), 6367. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176367
2. Ades, J., Apparicio, P. ve Séguin, A. M. (2012). Are new patterns of low‐income distribution emerging in Canadian metropolitan areas? The Canadian Geographer/le géographe canadien, 56(3), 339-361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.2012.00438.x
3. Akbulut, F. (2016). Kentsel ulaşım hizmetlerinin planlanması ve yönetiminde sürdürülebilir politika önerileri. Kastamonu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 336-355.
4. Allen, J. ve Farber, S. (2019). Sizing up transport poverty: A national scale accounting of low-income households suffering from inaccessibility in Canada, and what to do about it. Transport policy, 74, 214-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.018
5. Ayhan, F. (2017). İstanbul’un güneybatı ilçelerinde (Beylikdüzü, Silivri ve Büyükçekmece) ulaşımın nüfus ve yerleşmeye etkisi. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, (35), 155-165.
6. Benenson, I., Martens, K., Rofé, Y. ve Kwartler, A. (2011). Public transport versus private car GIS-based estimation of accessibility applied to the Tel Aviv metropolitan area. The Annals of Regional Science, 47, 499-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-010-0392-6
7. Benenson, I., Ben-Elia, E., Rofé, Y. ve Geyzersky, D. (2017). The benefits of a high-resolution analysis of transit accessibility. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31(2), 213-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1191637
8. Bouyssou, D. ve Marchant, T. (2011). Ranking scientists and departments in a consistent manner. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1761-1769. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21544

9. Braveman, P., Oliva, G., Miller, M. G., Schaaf, V. M. ve Reiter, R. (1988). Women without health insurance. Links between access, poverty, ethnicity, and health. Western Journal of Medicine, 149(6), 708.
10. Clark, W. A. V. ve Wang, W. W. (2010). The Automobile, Immigrants, and Poverty: Implications for Immigrant Earnings and Job Access. Urban Geography, 31(4), 523–540. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.31.4.523
11. Curl, A., Nelson, J. D. ve Anable, J. (2011). Does accessibility planning address what matters? A review of current practice and practitioner perspectives. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2, 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2011.07.001
12. Currie, G., Richardson, T., Smyth, P., Vella-Brodrick, D., Hine, J., Lucas, K. ve Stanley, J. (2010). Investigating links between transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being in Melbourne–Updated results. Research in transportation economics, 29(1), 287-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2010.07.036
13. Currie, G. V. ve Allen, J. L. (2007). Australians with disabilities: Transport disadvantage and disability. In No Way To Go-Transport and Social Disadvantage in Australian Communities (pp. 7-1). Monash University ePress.
14. Çiçek, D. ve Kozak, N. (2012). Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi’nde Yayımlanan Hakem Denetimli Makalelerin Bibliyometrik Profili. Türk Kütüphaneciliği Dergisi, 26(4), 734-756.
15. Delbosc, A. ve Currie, G. (2011a). Using Lorenz curves to assess public transport equity. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1252-1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.02.008
16. Delbosc, A. ve Currie, G. (2011b). The spatial context of transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1130-1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.04.005
17. Delbosc, A. ve Vella-Brodrick, D. (2015). The role of transport in supporting the autonomy of young adults. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 33, 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.03.011
18. Dereli, A. B. (2024). Vosviewer ile bibliyometrik analiz. Communicata (28), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.32952/communicata.1517725
19. Engels, B. ve Liu, G. J. (2011). Social exclusion, location and transport disadvantage amongst non-driving seniors in a Melbourne municipality, Australia. Journal of transport geography, 19(4), 984-996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.007
20. Erdoğan, H. T. (2016). Ulaşım hizmetlerinin ekonomik kalkınma üzerine etkisi. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(1), 187-215. https://doi.org/10.17336/igusbd.05060
21. Fransen, K., Neutens, T., Farber, S., De Maeyer, P., Deruyter, G. ve Witlox, F. (2015). Identifying public transport gaps using time-dependent accessibility levels. Journal of Transport Geography, 48, 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.09.008
22. Harvey, D. (2003) The right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4): 939–994.
23. Gleeson, B. ve Randolph, B. (2002). Social disadvantage and planning in the Sydney context. Urban Policy and Research, 20(1), 101-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140220131636
24. Golub, A. ve Martens, K. (2014). Using principles of justice to assess the modal equity of regional transportation plans. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.07.014
25. Grusky, D. B. (2019). The past, present, and future of social inequality. In Social Stratification, Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective, Second Edition (pp. 3-51). Routledge.
26. Goodman, D. ve Deis, L. (2005). Web of Science (2004 Version) and Scopus. The Charleston Advisor, 6(3), 5-21.
27. Gössling, S. (2016). Urban transport justice. Journal of transport Geography, 54, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.05.002
28. Hine, J. ve Mitchell, F. (2001). Better for everyone? Travel experiences and transport exclusion. Urban studies, 38(2), 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980020018619
29. İstanbul’da Ulaşım Yoksulluğu Çalıştayı (2021). Ulaşım Yoksulluğundan Kapsayıcı Ulaşım Sistemine: Sosyo Mekânsal Eşitsizlikleri Azaltmaya Yönelik Bir Model Önerisi (TÜBİTAK 1001 Programı destekli Proje no:120K152).
30. Iqbal, S., Woodcock, A. ve Osmond, J. (2020). The effects of gender transport poverty in Karachi. Journal of transport geography, 84, 102677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102677
31. Karner, A., London, J., Rowangould, D. ve Manaugh, K. (2020). From Transportation Equity to Transportation Justice: Within, Through, and Beyond the State. Journal of Planning Literature, 35(4), 440-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220927691
32. Kenyon, S., Lyons, G. ve Rafferty, J. (2002). Transport and social exclusion: investigating the possibility of promoting inclusion through virtual mobility. Journal of Transport Geography, 10(3), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00012-1
33. Lange, J. ve Norman, P. (2018). Quantifying service accessibility/transport disadvantage for older people in non-metropolitan South Australia. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 11, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-016-9206-2
34. Li, K., Rollins, J. ve Yan, E. (2018). Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: A selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics, 115(1)–1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2622-5
35. Litman, T. (2015) Transportation Affordability. Evaluation and Improvements Strategies. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
36. Lucas, K., Grosvenor, T. ve Simpson, R. (2001). Transport, the environment and social exclusion. YPS for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
37. Lucas, K., Mattioli, G., Verlinghieri, E. ve Guzman, A. (2016). Transport poverty and its adverse social consequences. Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-transport, 169(6), 353-365. https://doi.org/10.1680/jtran.15.00073
38. Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport policy, 20, 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
39. Lucas, K., Van Wee, B. ve Maat, K. (2016). A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches. Transportation, 43, 473-490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9585-2
40. Lucas, K. (2011). Making the connections between transport disadvantage and the social exclusion of low income populations in the Tshwane Region of South Africa. Journal of transport geography, 19(6), 1320-1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.02.007
41. Martens, K. (2016). Transport Justice: Designing fair transportation systems (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315746852
42. Mattioli, G. (2021). Transport energy poverty in the UK. In EP-pedia (pp. 1–7). TU Dortmund University.
43. Moore, J., Lucas, K. ve Bates, J. (2013). Social disadvantage and transport in the UK: A trip-based approach. Transport Studies Unit.
44. Owen, A. L. ve Weil, D. N. (1998). Intergenerational earnings mobility, inequality and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 41(1), 71-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(97)00067-6
45. Ongun, U. (2023). Kırsal Turizm ve Kırsal Kalkınma Yayınlarının VOSviewer ile Bibliyometrik Analizi. Turizm Zekası ve Akıllılığı Dergisi, 6(2), 79-97. https://doi.org/10.58636/jtis.1335826
46. Özalp, M. ve Öcalır, E. V. (2008). Türkiye’deki kentiçi ulaşım planlaması çalışmalarının değerlendirilmesi. ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(2), 71-97.
47. Pereira, R. H., Schwanen, T. ve Banister, D. (2017). Distributive justice and equity in transportation. Transport reviews, 37(2), 170-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1257660
48. Pojani, E., Boussauw, K. ve Pojani, D. (2017). Reexamining transport poverty, job access, and gender issues in Central and Eastern Europe. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(9), 1323-1345. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1372382
49. Preston, J. ve Rajé, F. (2007). Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion. Journal of transport geography, 15(3), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.05.002
50. Pyrialakou, V. D., Gkritza, K. ve Fricker, J. D. (2016). Accessibility, mobility, and realized travel behavior: Assessing transport disadvantage from a policy perspective. Journal of transport geography, 51, 252-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.02.001
51. Rodrigue, J. P. (2020). The geography of transport systems. Routledge.
52. Rodriguez-Lopez, M.E., Alc antara-Pilar, J.M., Del Barrio-García, S. ve Munoz-Leiva, F. (2020). A review of restaurant research in the last two decades: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 87, 102387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102387
53. Romero Gutiérrez, P. M. ve Olivares González, A. I. (2021). Urban mobility of Indigenous women: literature review and possible research routes. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 17(3), 378-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801211038653
54. Rozynek, C. ve Lanzendorf, M. (2023). How does low income affect older people’s travel practices? Findings of a qualitative case study on the links between financial poverty, mobility and social participation. Travel behaviour and society, 30, 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.10.003
55. Salon, D. ve Gulyani, S. (2010). Mobility, Poverty, and Gender: Travel ‘Choices’ of Slum Residents in Nairobi, Kenya. Transport Reviews, 30(5), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640903298998
56. Schwanen, T., Lucas, K., Akyelken, N., Solsona, D. C., Carrasco, J. A. ve Neutens, T. (2015). Rethinking the links between social exclusion and transport disadvantage through the lens of social capital. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 74, 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.012
57. Sanchez, T. W. (2008). Poverty, policy, and public transportation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(5), 833-841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.01.011
58. Shi, K., Yang, Y., De Vos, J., Zhang, X. ve Witlox, F. (2022). Income and commute satisfaction: On the mediating roles of transport poverty and health conditions. Travel Behaviour and Society, 29, 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.07.004
59. Stanley, J. K., Hensher, D. A., Stanley, J. R. ve Vella-Brodrick, D. (2011). Mobility, social exclusion and well-being: Exploring the links. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 45(8), 789-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.06.007
60. Stanley, J., Stanley, J. ve Cao, D. (2017). Indicators of socio-spatial transport disadvantage for inter-island transport planning in rural Philippine communities. Social Inclusion, 5(4), 116-131. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v5i4.1098
61. Şahin, T. (2010). Sosyal dışlanma ve yoksulluk ilişkisi. Yardım ve Dayanışma Dergisi, 1(2), 71-80.
62. Taylor, Z. ve Józefowicz, I. (2012). Intra-urban daily mobility of disabled people for recreational and leisure purposes. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 155-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.12.008
63. Tekeli, İ. (2010). İstanbul ve Ankara İçin Kent İçi Ulaşım Tarihi Yazıları, Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.
64. Titheridge H, Mackett RL, Christie N, Oviedo Hernández D, Ye, R. (2014). Transport and poverty: a review of the evidence. UCL.
65. Torche, F. (2005). Unequal But Fluid: Social Mobility in Chile in Comparative Perspective. American Sociological Review, 70(3), 422-450. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000304
66. Uğur, A. ve Aliağaoğlu, A. (2022). Şehir içi ulaşım sistemleri üzerine. E. Kapluhan, F. Akbaş ve Ş. Demir (Ed.) Coğrafyada yeni yaklaşımlar ve güncel araştırma ve incelemeler içinde (s. 271-304). Gazi Kitabevi.
67. Velaga, N. R., Beecroft, M., Nelson, J. D., Corsar, D. ve Edwards, P. (2012). Transport poverty meets the digital divide: accessibility and connectivity in rural communities. Journal of Transport Geography, 21, 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.12.005
68. Walks, A. (2018). Driving the poor into debt? Automobile loans, transport disadvantage, and automobile dependence. Transport policy, 65, 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.01.001
69. Yu, Z., Yuan, D. ve Zhao, P. (2021). Transport Disadvantage and Mobility Inequity of the Elderly in Rural China. Journal of Transport and Health, 22, 101194. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.jth.2021.101194
70. Zhang, Y., Farber, S., Young, M., Tiznado-Aitken, I. ve Ross, T. (2023). Exploring travel patterns of people with disabilities: A multilevel analysis of accessible taxi trips in Toronto, Canada. Travel behaviour and society, 32, 100575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100575
71. Zhang, D. (2023). Understanding mobility inequality through the lens of economic welfare: The difference in willingness-to-pay and actual fare matters. Cities, 132, 104121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104121