Research Article

A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Approaches for Human Action Recognition

Volume: 9 Number: 2 June 30, 2025
EN

A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Approaches for Human Action Recognition

Abstract

Human Action Recognition (HAR) plays a crucial role in understanding and categorizing human activities from visual data, with applications ranging from surveillance, healthcare to human-computer interaction. However, accurately recognizing a diverse range of actions remains challenging due to variations in appearance, occlusions, and complex motion patterns. This study investigates the effectiveness of various deep learning model architectures on HAR performance across a dataset encompassing 15 distinct action classes. Our evaluation examines three primary architectural approaches: baseline EfficientNet models, EfficientNet models augmented with Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) blocks, and models combining SE blocks with Residual Networks. Our findings demonstrate that incorporating SE blocks consistently enhances classification accuracy across all tested models, underscoring the utility of channel attention mechanisms in refining feature representation for HAR tasks. Notably, the model architecture combining SE blocks with Residual Networks achieved the highest accuracy, increasing performance from 69.68% in baseline EfficientNet to 76.75%, marking a significant improvement. Additionally, alternative models, such as EfficientNet integrated with Support Vector Machines (EfficientNet-SVM) and ZeroShot Learning models, exhibit promising results, highlighting the adaptability and potential of diverse methodological approaches for addressing the complexities of HAR. These findings provide a foundation for future research in optimizing HAR systems, with implications for enhancing robustness and accuracy in action recognition applications.

Keywords

References

  1. Lu, M., Hu, Y., & Lu, X. (2020). Driver action recognition using deformable and dilated faster r-cnn with optimized region proposals. Applied Intelligence, 50(4), 1100–1111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-019-01603-4.
  2. Lin, W., Sun, M.-T., Poovandran, R., & Zhang, Z. (2008). Human activity recognition for video surveillance. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), 2737–2740. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2008.4542023.
  3. Rodomagoulakis, I., Kardaris, N., Pitsikalis, V., Mavroudi, E., Katsamanis, A., Tsiami, A., & Maragos, P. (2016). Multimodal human action recognition in assistive human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2702–2706. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2016.7472168
  4. Dentamaro, V., Gattulli, V., Impedovo, D., & Manca, F. (2024). Human activity recognition with smartphone-integrated sensors: A survey. Expert Systems with Applications, 123, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123143
  5. Aydın, V. A. (2024). Comparison of CNN-based methods for yoga pose classification. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 8(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1275826
  6. Gülgün, O. D., & Erol, H. (2020). Classification performance comparisons of deep learning models in pneumonia diagnosis using chest x-ray images. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 4(3), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.652358
  7. Polater, S. N., & Sevli, O. (2024). Deep learning based classification for Alzheimer’s disease detection using MRI images. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 8(4), 729–740. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1434866.
  8. Willems, G., Tuytelaars, T., & Van Gool, L. (2008). An efficient dense and scale-invariant spatio-temporal interest point detector. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2008: 10th European Conference on Computer Vision, Marseille, France, October 12-18, 2008, Proceedings, Part II (Vol. 10, pp. 650–663). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88688-4_48.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Software Engineering (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

January 19, 2025

Publication Date

June 30, 2025

Submission Date

November 5, 2024

Acceptance Date

December 21, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 9 Number: 2

APA
Yiğit, G. (2025). A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Approaches for Human Action Recognition. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 9(2), 281-289. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1579795
AMA
1.Yiğit G. A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Approaches for Human Action Recognition. TUJE. 2025;9(2):281-289. doi:10.31127/tuje.1579795
Chicago
Yiğit, Gülsüm. 2025. “A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Approaches for Human Action Recognition”. Turkish Journal of Engineering 9 (2): 281-89. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1579795.
EndNote
Yiğit G (June 1, 2025) A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Approaches for Human Action Recognition. Turkish Journal of Engineering 9 2 281–289.
IEEE
[1]G. Yiğit, “A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Approaches for Human Action Recognition”, TUJE, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 281–289, June 2025, doi: 10.31127/tuje.1579795.
ISNAD
Yiğit, Gülsüm. “A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Approaches for Human Action Recognition”. Turkish Journal of Engineering 9/2 (June 1, 2025): 281-289. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1579795.
JAMA
1.Yiğit G. A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Approaches for Human Action Recognition. TUJE. 2025;9:281–289.
MLA
Yiğit, Gülsüm. “A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Approaches for Human Action Recognition”. Turkish Journal of Engineering, vol. 9, no. 2, June 2025, pp. 281-9, doi:10.31127/tuje.1579795.
Vancouver
1.Gülsüm Yiğit. A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Approaches for Human Action Recognition. TUJE. 2025 Jun. 1;9(2):281-9. doi:10.31127/tuje.1579795

Cited By

Flag Counter