Research Article

PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF ANFIS, ANN, SVR, CART AND MLR TECHNIQUES FOR GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION OF CARBON NANOTUBES USING CASTEP

Volume: 2 Number: 3 September 1, 2018
EN

PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF ANFIS, ANN, SVR, CART AND MLR TECHNIQUES FOR GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION OF CARBON NANOTUBES USING CASTEP

Abstract

Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations used in the Carbon Nanotubes (CNT) design take a very long time even in the simulation environment as it is well known in literature. In this study, calculation time of DFT for geometry optimization of CNT is reduced from days to minutes using seven artificial intelligence-based and one statistical-based methods and the results are compared. The best results are achieved from ANFIS and ANN based models and these models can be used instead of CNT simulation software with high accuracy. 

Keywords

References

  1. Abo-Elhadeed, A. F. (2012). "Modeling carbon nanotube transistors using neural networks approach." Proc., International Conference on Synthesis, Modeling, Analysis and Simulation Methods and Applications to Circuit Design (SMACD), pp. 125-128.
  2. Acı, M. and Avcı, M. (2016). "Artificial neural network approach for atomic coordinate prediction of carbon nanotubes." Applied Physics A, vol. 7 No. 122, pp. 1-14.
  3. Akbari, E., Buntat, Z., Enzevaee, A., Ebrahimi, M., Yazdavar, A. H. and Yusof, R. (2014). "Analytical modeling and simulation of I–V characteristics in carbon nanotube based gas sensors using ANN and SVR methods." Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, Vol. 137, No. 1, pp. 173-180.
  4. CASTEP Biovia Materials. http://accelrys.com/products/collaborative-science/biovia-materials-studio/quantom-catalysis-software.html [Accessed 10 May 2017].
  5. Cheng, W., Cai, C., Luo, Y., Li, Y. and Zhao, C. (2015). "Mechanical properties prediction for carbon nanotubes/epoxy composites by using support vector regression." Modern Physics Letters B, Vol. 29, No. 05, pp. 1550016.
  6. Eberly, L. E. (2007). Multiple linear regression. In: Topics in biostatistics, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, USA.
  7. Ensafi, A. A., Taei, M., Khayamian, T. and Hasanpour, F. (2010). "Simultaneous voltammetric determination of enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in urine and plasma using multiwall carbon nanotubes modified glassy carbon electrode by least-squares support vector machines." Analytical Sciences, Vol. 26, No. 7, pp. 803-808.
  8. Gupta, N. (2013). "Artificial neural network." Network and Complex Systems, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 24-28.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 1, 2018

Submission Date

March 22, 2018

Acceptance Date

April 10, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 2 Number: 3

APA
Acı, M., Acı, Ç. İ., & Avcı, M. (2018). PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF ANFIS, ANN, SVR, CART AND MLR TECHNIQUES FOR GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION OF CARBON NANOTUBES USING CASTEP. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 2(3), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.408976
AMA
1.Acı M, Acı Çİ, Avcı M. PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF ANFIS, ANN, SVR, CART AND MLR TECHNIQUES FOR GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION OF CARBON NANOTUBES USING CASTEP. TUJE. 2018;2(3):119-124. doi:10.31127/tuje.408976
Chicago
Acı, Mehmet, Çiğdem İnan Acı, and Mutlu Avcı. 2018. “PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF ANFIS, ANN, SVR, CART AND MLR TECHNIQUES FOR GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION OF CARBON NANOTUBES USING CASTEP”. Turkish Journal of Engineering 2 (3): 119-24. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.408976.
EndNote
Acı M, Acı Çİ, Avcı M (September 1, 2018) PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF ANFIS, ANN, SVR, CART AND MLR TECHNIQUES FOR GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION OF CARBON NANOTUBES USING CASTEP. Turkish Journal of Engineering 2 3 119–124.
IEEE
[1]M. Acı, Ç. İ. Acı, and M. Avcı, “PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF ANFIS, ANN, SVR, CART AND MLR TECHNIQUES FOR GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION OF CARBON NANOTUBES USING CASTEP”, TUJE, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 119–124, Sept. 2018, doi: 10.31127/tuje.408976.
ISNAD
Acı, Mehmet - Acı, Çiğdem İnan - Avcı, Mutlu. “PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF ANFIS, ANN, SVR, CART AND MLR TECHNIQUES FOR GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION OF CARBON NANOTUBES USING CASTEP”. Turkish Journal of Engineering 2/3 (September 1, 2018): 119-124. https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.408976.
JAMA
1.Acı M, Acı Çİ, Avcı M. PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF ANFIS, ANN, SVR, CART AND MLR TECHNIQUES FOR GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION OF CARBON NANOTUBES USING CASTEP. TUJE. 2018;2:119–124.
MLA
Acı, Mehmet, et al. “PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF ANFIS, ANN, SVR, CART AND MLR TECHNIQUES FOR GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION OF CARBON NANOTUBES USING CASTEP”. Turkish Journal of Engineering, vol. 2, no. 3, Sept. 2018, pp. 119-24, doi:10.31127/tuje.408976.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Acı, Çiğdem İnan Acı, Mutlu Avcı. PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF ANFIS, ANN, SVR, CART AND MLR TECHNIQUES FOR GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION OF CARBON NANOTUBES USING CASTEP. TUJE. 2018 Sep. 1;2(3):119-24. doi:10.31127/tuje.408976

Cited By

Flag Counter