A brief review on attack design and detection strategies for networked cyber-physical systems
Abstract
Networked cyber-physical systems (NCPSs) can be found in various fields such as industrial process, robotics, smart buildings, energy, healthcare systems, transportation, and surveillance. Recently accomplished real-time attacks indicate security vulnerabilities that weaken the reliability of NCPSs. Research areas on the security of NCPSs can be categorized into two groups: from the perspective of information security, from the perspective of control theory. In this paper, first possible attack locations on the control scheme of a NCPS which can be divided into three different groups namely sensor side, actuator side, and state estimator side are discussed and then a brief survey containing some recent studies on security strategies for NCPSs from the perspective of control theory is presented. After that attack detection strategies for a NCPS are briefly introduced and a general architecture utilized for attack detection on a NCPS is presented. In addition, some of recent studies on attack detection strategies for NCPSs from the perspective of control theory are discussed.
Keywords
References
- Amin S, Cárdenas A A & Sastry S S (2009). Safe and secure networked control systems under denial-of-service attacks. In International Workshop on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 5469, 31-45. ISBN 978-3-642-00602-9
- Ayas M S & Djouadi S M (2016). Undetectable sensor and actuator attacks for observer based controlled Cyber-Physical Systems. IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence, 1-7. DOI: 10.1109/SSCI.2016.7849882
- Barthels A, Ruf F, Walla G, Fröschl J, Michel H U & Baumgarten U (2011). A model for sequence based power management in cyber physical systems. In International Conference on Information and Communication on Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 87-101. ISBN 978-3-642-23447-7
- Cárdenas A A, Amin S & Sastry S (2008). Secure control: Towards survivable cyber-physical systems. The 28th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, Beijing, China, 495-500. DOI: 10.1109/ICDCS. Workshops.2008.40
- Chen J, Tan R, Xing G, Wang X & Fu X (2012). Fidelity-aware utilization control for cyber-physical surveillance systems. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 23(9), 1739-1751. DOI: 10.1109/TPDS.2012.74
- Conti J P (2010). The day the samba stopped [power blackouts]. Engineering & Technology, 5(4), 46-47. DOI: 10.1049/et.2010.0410
- Deng R, Xiao G & Lu R (2017). Defending against false data injection attacks on power system state estimation. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 13(1), 198-207. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2015.2470218
- Djouadi S M, Melin A M, Ferragut E M, Laska J A & Dong J (2014). Finite energy and bounded attacks on control system sensor signals. 2014 American Control Conference, Portland, Oregon, USA, 1716-1722. DOI: 10.1109/ACC.2014.6859001
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Engineering
Journal Section
Conference Paper
Authors
Publication Date
January 1, 2021
Submission Date
October 30, 2019
Acceptance Date
April 12, 2020
Published in Issue
Year 2021 Volume: 5 Number: 1
Cited By
Performance analysis for cyber–physical systems under two types of stealthy deception attacks
Automatica
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2023.111446Encrypted malware detection methodology without decryption using deep learning-based approaches
Turkish Journal of Engineering
https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1416933Optimized Attack and Detection on Multi-Sensor Cyber-Physical System
Computers, Materials & Continua
https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2025.065946AtEdO-BLGBM: A Hybrid Optimization and Boosting Framework for Scalable Intrusion Detection in Heterogeneous IoT Networks
Turkish Journal of Engineering
https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1715511Understanding Machine Learning Model Behavior for Intrusion Detection Across Attacks
Turkish Journal of Engineering
https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1613468