A Stocking Diagram for Even-aged Mixed Pine-Fir Stands of Kastamonu Region

Year 2025, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 87 - 94, 20.01.2025

Ferhat Kara , Arif Oguz Altunel

https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1511251

Abstract

Forest stand density diagrams help forest managers and practitioners more effectively manage stand density and tree occupancy to meet specific silvicultural goals. Therefore, creating such auxiliary silvicultural tools for different stands is essential. To our knowledge, no relative density graphs or diagrams have been developed for mixed stands in Türkiye. This study aimed to develop a stocking diagram for mixed Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)-Kazdağı fir (Abies nordmanniana subsp. equi-trojani) stands. In the study, statistical relations between stocking percent and diameter increment in selected sample plots were also determined, and these statistical relations were compared with the "stand basal area-diameter increment relations" in the same sample plots. Stand stocking percent was found to be more descriptive than absolute density measurement units (i.e., basal area) in defining stand density in mixed Scots pine-Kazdağı fir stands. The resulting stock diagram may allow more effective use of stand growing space to achieve various silvicultural goals, including regeneration, thinning, and wildlife protection in mixed Scots pine- Kazdağı fir stands. Depicting various density measures including basal area, trees per ha, and stand stocking percent, the findings of this study would facilitate the tree density management in mixed Scots pine- Kazdağı fir stands.

Keywords

Abies, Absolute density, Pinus, Relative density, Silviculture

Ethical Statement

NA

Supporting Institution

TÜBİTAK

Project Number

123O143

References

• Pretzsch, H., Forrester, D. I., & Bauhus, J. (2017). Mixed-species forests: ecology and management. Springer Nature, Springer-Verlag GmbH, Berlin, Germany. ISBN: 978-3-662-54551-5.
• Odabaşı, T., Calışkan, A., & Bozkuş, H. F. (2004). Silvikültür tekniği. İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul. ISBN: 975-404-702-2.
• Mensah, S., Salako, V.K., & Seifert, T. (2020). Structural complexity and large‐sized trees explain shifting species richness and carbon relationship across vegetation types. Functional Ecology, 34(8), 1731-1745.
• Richards, A. E., Forrester, D. I., Bauhus, J., & Scherer-Lorenzen, M. (2010). The influence of mixed tree plantations on the nutrition of individual species: a review. Tree Physiol, 30, 1192–1208.
• Pádua, C. B. V., & Chiaravalotti, R. (2012). Silviculture and biodiversity. Writings of the Dialogue (Vol. 4, pp. 68). Rio do Sul, SC: Apremavi, Brasil. ISBN: 978-85-88733-09-1.
• Huang, Y., Chen, Y., Castro-Izaguirre, N., Baruffol, M., Brezzi, M., Lang, A., ….. & Schmid, B. (2018). Impacts of species richness on productivity in a large-scale subtropical forest experiment. Science, 362(6410), 80-83.
• Zhang, Y., Chen, H. Y., & Reich, P. B. (2012). Forest productivity increases with evenness, species richness and trait variation: a global meta-analysis. J. Ecol., 100, 742.
• del Río, M., Pretzsch, H., Ruíz-Peinado, R., Ampoorter, E., Annighöfer, P., Barbeito, I., Bielak, K., Brazaitis, G., Coll, L., & Drössler, L. (2017). Species interactions increase the temporal stability of community productivity in Pinus sylvestris–Fagus sylvatica mixtures across Europe. Journal of Ecology, 105(4), 1032–1043.
• Çolak, A. H., Tokcan, M., Rotherham, I. D., & Atici, E. (2009). The amount of coarse dead wood and associated decay rates in forest reserves and managed forests, northwest Turkey. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales, 18 (3), 350-359.
• Göksel, Ç., & Karip, G. B. (2017). İğneada koruma alanının arazi örtüsü/arazi kullanımının zamana bağlı değişiminin Markov zincirleri ile modellenmesi. Geomatik, 2(2), 94-105.
• Selim, S., Demir, N., & Şahin, S. O. (2022). Automatic detection of forest trees from digital surface models derived by aerial images. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 7(3), 208-213.
• Kara, F. (2022). Effects of light transmittance on growth and biomass of understory seedlings in mixed pine-beech forests. European Journal of Forest Research, 141, 1189-1200.
• Hulvey, K. B., Hobbs, R. J., Standish, R. J., Lindenmayer, D. B., Lach, L., & Perring, M. P. (2013). Benefits of tree mixes in carbon plantings. Nature Climate Change, (10), 869-874.
• Pretzsch, H., & Schütze, G. (2016). Effect of tree species mixing on the size structure. density. and yield of forest stands. European Journal of Forest Research, 135(1), 1-22.
• Genç, D. M. (2020). Orman Bakımı. Beşinci baskı. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Türkiye. ISBN: 9757929301
• Kara, F., Loewenstein, E. F., Lhotka, J. M., & Kush, J. S. (2017). A Gingrich-Style Stocking Chart for Longleaf Pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) Forests. Forest Science, 64(3), 307-315.
• Curtis, R. O., & Rushmore, F. M. (1958). Some effects of stand density and deer browsing on reproduction in an Adirondack hardwood stand. Journal of Forestry, 56 (2), 116-121.
• Bormann, B. T., &Gordon, J. C. (1984). Stand density effects in young red alder plantations: productivity, photosynthate partitioning, and nitrogen fixation. Ecology, 65(2), 394-402.
• Smith, R. J. (2009). Use and misuse of reduced major axis for line-fitting. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 140, 476-486.
• Peterson, D. W., & Reich, P. B. (2001). Prescribed fire in oak savanna: fire frequency effects on stand structure and dynamics. Ecological Applications, 11(3), 914-927.
• Akar, A., & Gökalp, E. (2018). Designing a sustainable rangeland information system for Turkey. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 3(3), 87-97.
• Johnson, P. S., Shifley, S. R., & Rogers, R. (2009). The ecology and silviculture of oaks. CABI. USA. ISBN: 9781780647081
• Nyland, R.D. (2002). Silviculture; concepts and applications. Second Edition. Waveland Press, Inc. Long Grove, IL. ISBN: 9781478633761.
• Reineke, L. H. (1933). Perfecting a stand-density index for even-age forests. J. Agri. Res., 46, 627- 638.
• Gingrich, S. (1967). Measuring and Evaluating Stocking and Stand Density in Upland Hardwood Forests in the Central States. For. Sci., 13, 38–53.
• Larsen, D. R., Dey, D. C., & Faust, T. (2010). A stocking diagram for midwestern eastern cotonwood-silver maple-American sycamore bottomland forests. North. J. Appl. For., 27, 132–139.
• Solomon, D. S., & Zhang, L. (2002). Maximum size-density relationships for mixed softwoods in the northeastern USA. For. Ecol. Manage., 155, 163-170.
• Comeau, P. G., M. White, G. Kerr, & S. E. Hale. (2010). Maximum density–size relationships for Sitka spruce and coastal Douglas-fir in Britain and Canada. Forestry, 83, 461-468.
• Curtis, R. O., & Marshall, D. D. (2000). Why quadratic mean diameter?. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 15(3), 137-139.
• Grafiti L. L. C. (2024). SigmaPlot, a powerful and versatile scientific tool for Data analysis & visualization. https://grafiti.com/sigmaplot-detail/.
• Shaw, J. D., & Long, J. N. (2007). A density management diagram for longleaf pine stands with application of red-cockaded woodpecker habitat. South. J. Appl. For., 31, 28:38.
• Pretzsch, H., & P. Biber. (2005). A re-evaluation of Reineke’s rule and stand density index. For. Sci., 51, 304–320.
• Bring, J. (1994). How to standardize regression coefficients? American Statistician, 48, 209-213.
• Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. Lawrence Erlbaurn Associates, Inc. New Jersey, USA. 392 p. ISBN: 9780585418728.
• R Development Core Team., 2010. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
• Karels, T. J., Dobson, F. S., Trevino, H. S., & Skibiel, A. L. (2008). The biogeography of avian extinctions on oceanic islands. J Biogeography, 35, 1106-1111.
• Ahmadi, K., Alavi, S. J., Tabari, K., & Aertsen, W. (2013). Non-linear height-diameter models for oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) in the Hyrcanian forests, Iran. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ, 17, 431-440.
• Cochran, P. H., Geist, J. M., Ckemens, D. L., Clausnitzer, R. R., & Powel, D. C. (1994). Suggested stocking levels for forest stands in northeastern Oregon and southeastern Washington. USDA Forest Service, Research Note: PNW-RN-513. 16 p.
• Kara, F., & Lhotka, J.M. (2020). Climate and silvicultural implications in modifying stand composition in mixed fir-pine stands. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 39(5), 511-525.
• Vacchiano, G., Motta, R., Long, J. N., & Shaw, J. D. (2008). A density management diagram for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.): A tool for assessing the forest's protective effect. Forest Ecology and Management, 255(7), 2542-2554.
• Farnden, C. (1996). Stand density management diagrams for lodgepole pine, white spruce and interior Douglas-fir (No. BC-X-360, pp. v+-37).
• Chisman, H. H., & Schumacher, F. X. (1940). On the tree-area ratio and certain of its applications. Journal of Forestry, 38(4), 311-317.