Effects of tomato cultivars on drying performance and physicochemical quality of organic sun-dried tomatoes
Abstract
The growing global demand for organic sun-dried tomatoes has heightened the importance of enhancing tomato value through drying and integrating them into agricultural-based industries. Among the key factors influencing the quality and yield of dried tomatoes is the cultivar used. This study aimed to evaluate the drying performance and quality characteristics of five different F1 hybrid tomato cultivars (‘Albeni’, ‘Eden’, ‘Toro’, ‘Zeplin’, and ‘SV1491TM’) grown under organic conditions. The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replicates per cultivar. Tomatoes harvested at full maturity were halved, sprinkled with 2% salt, and sun-dried. The results showed that the cultivars significantly affected the quality attributes of the final dried product. Cultivar had a direct influence on fruit weight, diameter, color, dry matter content, pH, total soluble solids, lycopene, and total phenolic content. In contrast, its effects on antioxidant activity, salt content, and mold–yeast load were limited. ‘Albeni’ and ‘Toro’ cultivars exhibited the highest total soluble solids content (68.93% and 61.97%, respectively), drying yield (8.14% and 8.72%), titratable acidity (5.97% and 5.39%), and lycopene content (0.77 and 0.61 mg g-1 dry matter, respectively). Based on the overall results, ‘Albeni’ and ‘Toro’ were identified as the most suitable cultivars for organic sun-dried tomato production, offering advantages in both drying yield and quality.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
Ethical Statement
Thanks
References
- Abak, K., Düzyaman, E., Şeniz, V., Gülen, H., Pekşen, A., & Kaymak, H. Ç. (2010). Sebze üretimini geliştirme yöntem ve hedefleri. VII. Ziraat Kongresi, 11–15.
- Aboagye-Nuamah, F., Hussein, Y. A., & Ackun, A. (2018). Biochemical properties of six varieties of tomato from Brong Ahafo region of Ghana as influenced by the ripening condition and drying. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.81.16975
- Aizawa, K., & Inakuma, T. (2007). Quantitation of carotenoids in commonly consumed vegetables in Japan. Food Science and Technology Research, 13(3), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.3136/fstr.13.247
- Akgün, B., Genç, S., & Arıcı, M. (2018). Tuz: Gıdalardaki algısı, fonksiyonları ve kullanımının azaltılmasına yönelik stratejiler. Academic Food Journal / Akademik GIDA, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.24323/akademikgida.475397
- Altıntaş, G. (2014). Sanayilik domates. Orta Karadeniz Geçit Kuşağı Tarımsal Araştırma İstasyonu Müdürlüğü, Tarımsal Araştırmalardan Bakış, Tokat.
- Amr, A., & Raie, W. (2022). Tomato components and quality parameters: A review. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 18(3), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.35516/jjas.v18i3.444
- Anon. (2011). Gıdalarda tuz tayini. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, Ankara. https://megep.meb.gov.tr/mte_program_modul/moduller_pdf/G%C4%B1dalarda%20Tuz%20Tayini.pdf
- AOAC. (1990). Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Post Harvest Horticultural Technologies (Incl. Transportation and Storage)
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
April 7, 2026
Submission Date
March 6, 2026
Acceptance Date
April 7, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 8 Number: 1