Nonpatojen Fusarium spp.'lerinin Nohutta Fusarium Solgunluğuna Karşı in vitro Koşullarda Antagonist Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi

Merve Dilmaç; Havva Dinler; Barış Kaki

doi:10.30910/turkjans.697883

Nonpatojen Fusarium spp.'lerinin Nohutta Fusarium Solgunluğuna Karşı in vitro Koşullarda Antagonist Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi

Abstract

Dünyada ve ülkemizde nohut ekimi yapılan alanlarda son yıllarda dikkat çeken önemli hastalıklardan biri de Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris Padwick (Foc)'in neden olduğu Fusarium solgunluğudur. Bu hastalık nedeniyle ülkemizde nohut ekim alanlarının yaklaşık %40'ı bulaşık olup, ekonomik olarak önemli ürün kayıplarına neden olmaktadır. Hastalıkla mücadelede dünya genelinde en etkili ve pratik yöntemlerden biri de dayanıklı çeşitlerin kullanılmasıdır. Ancak dayanıklı çeşit kullanımının etkililiği, Foc'ta patojenik ırkların ortaya çıkması ile kısıtlanmaktadır. Nohutta fusarium solgunluğunun mücadelesinde dayanıklı çeşitlerin kullanımı ile birlikte bakteriyel veya fungal antogonistler de kullanılarak biyolojik kontrol yoluyla hastalıkla mücadele arttırılabilir. Günümüzde non-patojen fusarium izolatları ve farklı forma speciales'leri fusarium solgunluk hastalıklarının biyolojik mücadelesi için umut verici bir stratejidir. Çalışma nohutta Fusarim solgunluğuna karşı nohut bitkilerinden izole edilen ve patojenisite denemesi sonucunda nonpatojen olan 110 Fusarium spp. izolatının in vitro koşullarda antogonistik etkilerini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmış ve çalışmada ikili kültür metodu kullanılmıştır. İkili kültür metodu sonucunda 105 non-patojen Fusarium spp. izolatı Patates Dekstroz Agar (PDA) besi yerinde antogonistik etki göstermiştir. Non-patojen olan Fusarium spp. izolatlarının Fusarium oxysporum’un misel gelişimini en düşük ve en yüksek %8.88-44.46 arasında engellediği belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, çalışmada kullanılan non-patojen Fusarium izolatlarının Fusarium oxysporum’un misel gelişimini engellemiş olması nedeniyle, bu izolatlar solgunluk hastalığına karşı biyolojik mücadele çalışmalarında önemli bir potansiyel antogonist olarak kullanılabileceğini düşündürmektedir. Ayrıca F.oxysporum’un misel gelişimini engellemede en yüksek antogonistik etki gösteren non-patojen izolatların in vivo koşullarda da denenmesi sonucunda biyolojik mücadele çalışmalarında tek başına ya da diğer biyolojik ajanlarla kullanılması, hastalıkla mücadelede ümitvar sonuçlar verebileceği düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

References

Referans1Abeysinghe, S. 2006. Biological control of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicis-cucumerinum, the causal agent of root and stem rot of Cucumis sativus by non-pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum. Ruhuna Journal of Science, 1: 24-31.
Referans2Aime, S., Alabouvette, C., Steinberg, C. ve Olivain, C. 2013. The endophytic strain Fusarium oxysporum Fo47: A good candidate for priming the defense responses in tomato roots. MPMI, 26 (8): 918-926.
Referans3Alabouvette, C., Lemanceau, P. ve Steinberg, C. 1993. Recent advances in biological control of fusarium wilts. Pesticide Sciences, 37: 365-373.
Referans4Altınok, H.H. 2009. Activation of systemic disease resistance by acibenzolar-S-methyl and a non-pathogen Fusarium oxysporum melonis (FOM) strain against Fusarium wilt disease in eggplant seedlings. J. Turk. Phytopath., 38 (1-3): 21-32.
Referans5Anonim, 2020a. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, (http//:www.faostat.fao. org) (Erişim tarihi: 10 Ocak 2020).
Referans6Anonim, 2020b. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, Bitkisel Üretim İstatistikleri, (http//:www.tuik.gov.tr) (Erişim tarihi: 10 Ocak 2020).
Referans7Atalay, E. 2009. Türkiye'deki Tescilli Nohut (C. arietinum L.) Çeşitlerinin ve Bazı Nohut Genotiplerinin Demir Uygulamalarına Gösterdikleri Tepkilerin ve Genetik Akrabalık Derecelerinin Belirlenmesi. Tarla Bitkileri Anabilim Dalı. Doktora Tezi. Konya.
Referans8Basbagci, G., Unal, F., Uysal, A. ve Dolar, S. 2019. Identification and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia solani AG-4 causing root rot on chickpea in Turkey. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 17 (2):1007-1019.

Referans9Bayraktar, H. ve Dolar, F.S. 2009. Genetic diversity of wilt and root rot pathogens of chickpea, as assessed by RAPD and ISSR. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Forestry, 33: 1-10.
Referans10Bayraktar, H. ve Dolar, F.S. 2012. Pathogenic variability of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris isolates from chickpea in Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 44 (2): 821-823.
Referans11Benhamou, N., Garand, C. ve Goulet, A. 2002. Ability of nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum strain Fo47 to induce resistance against Pythium ultimum infection in cucumber. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68 (8): 4044–4060.
Referans12Cachinero, J.M., Hervas, A., Jimenez-Diaz, R.M. ve Tena, M. 2002. Plant defence reactions against fusarium wilt in chickpea induced by incompatible race 0 of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris and nonhost isolates of F. oxysporum. Plant Pathology, 51: 765–776.
Referans13Demirci, E., Eken, C. ve Kantar, F. 1999. Pathogenicity of wilt and root rot pathogens of chickpea cv. Aziziye-94. Journal of Turkish Phytopathology, 28: 25-32.
Referans14Dolar, F.S. 1996. Survey of chickpea disease in Ankara. Turkey. International Chickpea and Pigeonpea, 3: 33-34.
Referans15 Dolar, F.S. 1997. Determination of the races of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris in Ankara province of Turkey. Journal of Turkish Phytopathogy, 26 (1): 11-15.
Referans16Dubey, S.C., Singh, S.R. ve Singh, B. 2010. Morphologıcal and pathogenic variability of Indian isolates of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris causing chickpea wilt. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 43 (2): 174-190.
Referans17Edel-Hermann, V., Aime, S., Cordier, C., Olivain, C., Steinberg, C. ve Alabouvette, C. 2011. Development of a strain specific real-time PCR assay for the detection and quantification of the biological control agent Fo47 in root tissues. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 322 (1):34-40.
Referans18Eser, D. 1978. Yemeklik Tane Baklagiller Ders Rotosu. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları. Ankara, 98s.
Referans19Fravel, D.R. ve Larkin, R.P. 2002. Reduction of Fusarium wilt of hydroponically-grow basil by Fusarium oxysporum strain CS-20. Crop Protection, 21 (7): 539-543.
Referans20Fravel, D., Olivain, C. ve Alabouvette, C. 2002. Fusarium oxysporum and its biocontrol. New Phytologist, 157 (3): 493-502.
Referans21Fuch, J.G., Moenne, L.Y. ve Defago, G. 1999. Ability of nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum strain Fo47 to protect tomato againts fusarium wilts. Biological Control, 14: 105-110.
Referans22Garibaldi, A., Brunatti, F. ve Gullino, M.L. 1986. Suppression of Fusarium wilt of carnation by competitive nonpathogenic strains of Fusaria. Medical Fac Landbouw Rijksuniv Gent, 51 (2): 633-638.
Referans23Gerlach, K.S., Bentley, S., Moore, N.Y., Aitken, E.A.B. ve Pegg, K.G. 1999. Investigation of Non-Pathogenic Strains of Fusarium oxysporum for Suppression of Fusarium Wilt of Banana in Australia, 28. In: Alabouvette C, ed. Second International Fusarium Workshop. Dijon, France:INRA-CMSE, 54.
Referans24Hajarpoor, A., Soltani, A., Zeinali, E. ve Sayyedi, F. 2014. Potential benefits from adaptation to climate change in chickpea. TI Journals:Agriculture Science Developments, 3 (7): 230-236.
Referans25Haware , M.P., Nene, Y.L. ve Mathur, S.B. 1986. Ascochyta blight . Seed Borne Diseases of Chickpea. Technical Buletin from the Danish Goverment Institute of Seed Pathology for Developing Countries, No:1, Denmark, 15s.
Referans26Haware, M.P., Nene, Y.L. ve Natarajan, M. 1996. The survival of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri in the soil in the absence of chickpea. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 35 (1): 9-12.
Referans27Hervas, A., Landa, B. ve Jimenez-Diaz, R.M. 1997. Influence of chickpea genotype and Bacillus sp. on protection from Fusarium wilt by seed treatment with nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 103: 631-642.
Referans28Hervas, A., Landa, B., Datnoff, L.E. ve Jimenez-Diaz, R.M. 1998. Effects of commercial and indigenous microorganisms on Fusarium wilt development in chickpea. Biological Control, 13: 166-176.
Referans29Honda, M. ve Kawakub, Y. 1998. Control of Fusarium basal rot of rakkyo (Allium chinense) by non-pathogenic Fusarium moniliforme and Fusarium oxysporum. Soil Microorganisms, 51: 13-18.
Referans30Jimenez-Diaz, R.M., Castillo, P., del Mar Jimenez-Gasco, M., Landa, B.B. ve Navas-Cortes, J.A. 2015. Fusarium wilt of chickpeas: Biology, ecology and management. Crop Protection, 73: 16–27.
Referans31Jimenez-Gasco, M.M. ve Jimenez-Diaz, R.M. 2003. Development of a specific polymerase chain reaction based assay for the identification of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris and its pathogenic races 0, 1A, 5, and 6. Phytopathology, 93: 200-209.
Referans32Joshi, M., Srıvastava, R., Sharma, A. K. ve Prakash, A. 2012. Screening of resistant varieties and antagonistic Fusarium oxysporum for biocontrol of Fusarium wilt of chilli. J. Plant Pathol. Microbiology, 3 (5): 1-6.
Referans33Katzube, K. ve Akasaka, Y. 1997. Control of Fusarium wilt of spinach by transplanting seedlings pretreated with non-pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum. Japaese Journal of Phytopathology, 63: 389-394.
Referans34Katzube, K., Akasaka, Y. ve Nakatani, F. 1994. Biocontrol of Fusarium wilt of spinach by using nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum. 2. Investigation of inoculation methods. Annals of Reporter Plant Protection North Japan, 445: 72–75.
Referans35Kaur, R., Kaur, J. ve Singh, R.S. 2010. Nonpathogenic Fusarium as a biological control agent. Plant Pathology, 9 (3): 79–91.
Referans36Kaur, R., KauR, J., Sıngh, R.S. ve Alabouvette, C. 2007. Biological control of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri by non-pathogenic Fusarium and fluorescent Pseudomonas. Internartıonal Journal of Botany, 3 (1): 114-117.
Referans37Landa, B.B., Navas-Cortes, J.A., Hervas, A. ve Jimenez-Diaz, R.M. 2001. Influence of temperature and inoculum density of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris on suppression of Fusarium wilt of chickpea by rhizosphere bacteria. Phytopathology, 91: 807-816.
Referans38Landa, B.B., Navas-Cortes, J.A. ve Jimenez-Diaz, R.M. 2004. Integrated management of Fusarium wilt of chickpea with sowing date, host resistance, and biological control. Phytopathology, 94: 946-960.
Referans39Larkin, R.P ve Fravel, D.R. 1998. Efficacy of various fungal and bacterial biocontrol organism for control of Fusarium wilt of tomato. Plant Disease, 82: 1022-1028.
Referans40Larkin, R.P., Hopkins, D.L. ve Martin, F.N. 1993. Ecology of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum in soils suppressive and conducive to Fusarium wilt of watermelon. Phytopathology, 83: 1105-1116.
Referans41Larkin, R.P., Hopkins, D.L. ve Martin, F.N. 1996. Suppression of fusarium wilt of watermelon by nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum and other microorganisms recovered from a disease suppressive soil. Phytopathology, 86: 812-819.
Referans42Lemanceau, P. ve Alabouvette, C. 1991. Biological control of fusarium diseases by fluorescent Pseudomonas and non-pathogenic Fusarium. Crop Protection, 10: 279-286.
Referans43Magie, R.O. 1980. Fusarium disease of gladioli controlled by inoculation of corms with non-pathogenic Fusaria. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, 93: 172-175.
Referans44Mandeel, Q. ve Baker, R. 1991. Mechanisms involved in biological control of Fusarium wilt of cucumber with strains of nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum. Phytopathology, 81: 462-469.
Referans45Martin, A. 2004. Yerli Nohut Çeşitlerinin Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris Irklarına Karşı Reaksiyonları. Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. 42 s.
Referans46Minuto, A., Migheli, Q. ve Garibaldi, A. 1995. Evaluation of antagonistic strains of Fusarium spp. in the biological and integrated control of Fusarium wilt of cyclamen. Crop Protection, 14: 221-226.
Referans47Minuto, A., Minuto, G., Migheli, Q., Mocioni, M. ve Gullino, M.L. 1997a. Effect of antogonistic Fusarium spp. and of different commercial biofungicide formulations on Fusarium wilt of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) Crop Protection, 16: 765-769.
Referans48Minuto, A., Migheli, Q. ve Garibaldi, A. 1997b. Evulation of antogonistic strains of Fusarium spp. in the biological and integreated control of fusarium wilt of cyclamen. Crop Protection, 14: 221-226.
Referans49Nene, Y.L., Sheila, V.K. ve Sharma, S.B. 1996. A World List of Chickpea and Pigeonpea Pathogens. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics Patancheru 502 324, India, 27 s.
Referans50Nel, B., Steinberg, C., Labuschagne, N. ve Viljoen, A. 2006. The potential of nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum and other biological control organisms for suppressing Fusarium wilt of banana. Plant Pathology, 55: 217-223.
Referans51Ogawa, K. ve Komada, H. 1984. Biological control of Fusarium wilt of sweet potato by nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum. Japanese Journal of Phytopathology, 50: 1-9.
Referans52Ogawa, K. ve Komada, H. 1985. Biological control of Fusarium wilt of sweet potato with cross-protection by prior inoculation with nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly, 19 (1) :20-25.
Referans53Patil, U., Srıram, S. ve Savıtha, M.J. 2011. Evaluation of non-pathogenic Fusarium for antagonistic activity against Fusarium wilt of tomatos. Journal of Biological Control, 25 (2): 118–123.
Referans54Paulitz, T.C., Park, C. S. ve Baker, R. 1987. Biological control of Fusarium wilt of cucumber with non-pathogenic isolatesof Fusarium oxysporum. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 33 (5): 349-353.
Referans55Postma, J. ve Rattink, H. 1992. Biological control of Fusarium wilt of carnation with a nonpathogenic isolate of Fusarium oxysporum. Canadian Journal of Botany, 70: 1199-1205.
Referans56Raghunandan, B.L., Naık, L.K ve Shıvaprakash, M.K. 2014. Studies on non-pathogenic Fusarium Spp. for their biocontrol activity against Fusarium wilt pathogen of watermelon under in vitro. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 48 (1): 16-23.
Referans57Rouxel, F., Alabouvette, C. ve Louvet, J. 1979. Recherches sur la resistance des sols aux maladies. IV – Mise en evidence du role des Fusarium autochtones dans la resistance dun sol ala Fusariose vasculaire du Melon. Annales de Phytopathologie, 11: 199-207.
Referans58Schneider, R.W. 1984. Effects of nonpathogenic strains of Fusarium oxysporum on celery root infection by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. apii and a novel use of the line weaver-burk double reciprocal plt technique. Phytopathology, 74: 646-653.
Referans59Shishido, M., Mıwa, C., Usami, T., Amemiya, Y. ve Johnson, K. B. 2005. Biological control efficiency of Fusarium wilt of tomato by nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum Fo-B2 in different environments. Phytopathology, 95 (9): 1072-1080.
Referans60Singh, K.B. ve Reddy, M.V. 1996. Improving chickpea yield by incorporating resistance to Ascochyta blight. Theor. Appl. Genet., 92: 509-515.
Referans61Tamietti, G. ve Alabouvette, C. 1986. Resistance de sols aux maladies: XIII-Role des Fusarium oxysporum non pathogenes dans les mecanismes de resistance dun sol de noirmoutier aux fuseieses vascularies. Agronomie, 6: 541-548.
Referans62Tamietti, G. ve Pramotton, R. 1990. La receprivite des sols aux fusarioses vasculaires: Rapports entre resistance et microllore aotuchtone avec reference particuliere aux Fusarium non pathogens. Agronomie, 10: 69-76.
Referans63Tezuka N, Makino T. 1991. Biological control of Fusarium wilt of strawberry by nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum isolated from strawberry. Annals of Phytopathology Society of Japan, 57: 506–511.
Referans64Thongkamngam, T. and Jaenaksorn, T. 2017. Fusarium oxysporum (F221-B) as biocontrol agent against plant pathogenic fungi in vitro and in hydroponics. Plant Protect. Science, 53 (2): 85–95.
Referans65Trapero-Casas, A. ve Jimenez-Diaz, R.M. 1985. Fungal wilt and root rot disease of chickpea in Southern Spain. Phytopathology, 75: 1146-1151.
Referans66Yiğit, F. 2001. Common Names of some plant diseases and their cavsal agents. Selçuk üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi, Bitki Koruma Bölümü, Konya.
Referans67Yiğit, F., Arıkan, K. ve Balaban, Y.Y. 2007. Patojen olmayan Fusarium türleri ile domateste Fusarium kök çürüklüğü hastalığının biyolojik kontrolü üzerinde bir araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 21 (42): 59-63.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Merve Dilmaç
0000-0001-5033-5990
Türkiye

Havva Dinler ^*
0000-0002-7011-5183
Türkiye

Barış Kaki
0000-0002-5836-5438
Türkiye

Publication Date

July 20, 2020

Submission Date

March 5, 2020

Acceptance Date

May 22, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 7 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.697883

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA34HT72HY

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Dilmaç, M., Dinler, H., & Kaki, B. (2020). Nonpatojen Fusarium spp.’lerinin Nohutta Fusarium Solgunluğuna Karşı in vitro Koşullarda Antagonist Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 7(3), 775-792. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.697883

AMA

1.Dilmaç M, Dinler H, Kaki B. Nonpatojen Fusarium spp.’lerinin Nohutta Fusarium Solgunluğuna Karşı in vitro Koşullarda Antagonist Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi. TURKJANS. 2020;7(3):775-792. doi:10.30910/turkjans.697883

Chicago

Dilmaç, Merve, Havva Dinler, and Barış Kaki. 2020. “Nonpatojen Fusarium Spp.’lerinin Nohutta Fusarium Solgunluğuna Karşı in Vitro Koşullarda Antagonist Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi”. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 7 (3): 775-92. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.697883.

EndNote

Dilmaç M, Dinler H, Kaki B (July 1, 2020) Nonpatojen Fusarium spp.’lerinin Nohutta Fusarium Solgunluğuna Karşı in vitro Koşullarda Antagonist Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 7 3 775–792.

IEEE

[1]M. Dilmaç, H. Dinler, and B. Kaki, “Nonpatojen Fusarium spp.’lerinin Nohutta Fusarium Solgunluğuna Karşı in vitro Koşullarda Antagonist Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi”, TURKJANS, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 775–792, July 2020, doi: 10.30910/turkjans.697883.

ISNAD

Dilmaç, Merve - Dinler, Havva - Kaki, Barış. “Nonpatojen Fusarium Spp.’lerinin Nohutta Fusarium Solgunluğuna Karşı in Vitro Koşullarda Antagonist Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi”. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 7/3 (July 1, 2020): 775-792. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.697883.

JAMA

1.Dilmaç M, Dinler H, Kaki B. Nonpatojen Fusarium spp.’lerinin Nohutta Fusarium Solgunluğuna Karşı in vitro Koşullarda Antagonist Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi. TURKJANS. 2020;7:775–792.

MLA

Dilmaç, Merve, et al. “Nonpatojen Fusarium Spp.’lerinin Nohutta Fusarium Solgunluğuna Karşı in Vitro Koşullarda Antagonist Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi”. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3, July 2020, pp. 775-92, doi:10.30910/turkjans.697883.

Vancouver

1.Merve Dilmaç, Havva Dinler, Barış Kaki. Nonpatojen Fusarium spp.’lerinin Nohutta Fusarium Solgunluğuna Karşı in vitro Koşullarda Antagonist Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi. TURKJANS. 2020 Jul. 1;7(3):775-92. doi:10.30910/turkjans.697883

Cited By

The severity level classification of Fusarium wilt of chickpea by pre-trained deep learning models

Journal of Plant Pathology

https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-023-01520-z

KNN-based approach for the classification of fusarium wilt disease in chickpea based on color and texture features

European Journal of Plant Pathology

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-023-02791-z