Seçilmiş Prunus Anaçlarında Topraktan Yapraklara Bazı Makrobesin Maddelerinin İletim Performansları

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Malatya ve Elazığ illerinde yürütülen yabani erik türleri anaç ıslah projesinde ümitvar kabul edilen anaçların topraktan bitki besin maddelerinin alımını araştırmak amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Çalışma, 2020 yılında Malatya Kayısı Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü arazisi ve Kahramanmaraş Doğu Akdeniz Geçit Kuşağı Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü laboratuvarlarında tamamlanmıştır. Deneme alanının 0-30 cm ve 30-60 cm derinliklerinden alınan toprak örneklerinin analiz sonuçlarına göre, yarayışlı fosfor dışında diğer besin elementlerinin konsantrasyonlarının çok iyi durumda olduğu belirlenmiştir. Haziran ayı döneminde seçilen 69 adet anaçtan alınan yaprak örneklerinin analizleri sonucunda elde edilen miktarlara tartılı derecelendirme uygulanarak puanlamalar yapılmıştır. Bu yöntem dünyada ilk kez bu çalışma ile uygulanmıştır. Çalışma sonunda yaprak içeriklerinde fosforun % 0.16-0.55, potasyumun % 0.80-2.40, kalsiyumun % 0.41-3.48 ve magnezyumun ise % 0.15-0.49 arasında değiştiği saptanmıştır. Elde edilen bu değerlerin referans değerler ile büyük oranda benzerlik gösterdiği, diğer literatür verileri ile kıyaslandığında ise fosfor ve potasyumun yüksek, kalsiyum ve magnezyumun ise düşük kaldığı görülmüştür.

Keywords

• Makro bitki besin maddeleri
• Bitki besleme
• Prunus
• Anaç
• Toprak

Project Number

TAGEM/BBAD/B/20/A1/P3/1676

Performance of Transmit of Some Macronutrients from Soil to Leaves in Selected Prunus Rootstocks

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate the intake of macro plant nutrients from the soil of rootstocks that are considered promising in the wild plum rootstock breeding project carried out in Malatya and Elazığ provinces. The study was completed in 2020 on the land of the Malatya Apricot Research Institute and the laboratories of the Kahramanmaraş East Mediterranean Transitional Zone Agricultural Research of Institute. According to the analysis results of the soil samples taken from 0-30 cm and 30-60 cm depths of the experimental area, it was determined that the concentrations of other nutrients except available phosphorus were in very good condition. As a result of the analysis of leaf samples taken from 69 rootstocks selected in June, scoring was made by applying measured grading to the amounts obtained. This method has been applied for the first time in the world with this study. At the end of the study, it was determined that phosphorus varied between 0.16-0.55%, potassium 0.80-2.40%, calcium 0.41-3.48% and magnesium 0.15-0.49% in leaf contents. These values compared to other literature data, it was observed that phosphorus and potassium were high and calcium and magnesium were low.

Keywords

• Macronutrients
• Plant nutrition
• Prunus
• Rootstock
• Soil

Supporting Institution

TARIMSAL ARAŞTIRMALAR VE POLİTİKALAR GENEL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ

Project Number

TAGEM/BBAD/B/20/A1/P3/1676

Thanks

This scientific research manuscript was obtained from the project named "Dwarf and Semi-Dwarf Plum Rootstock Selection Suitable for Apricot in Malatya and Elazığ Provinces" supported by the General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies. Thanks to our General Directorate for their support.

References

1. Bouyoucus, G.L., 1951. A Recalibration of Hydrometer Method for Making Mechanical Analysis of Soils. Agronomy Journal 43, p. 434-438.
2. Epstein, E., Bloom A., 2005. Mineral Nutrition of Plants: Principles and Perspectives. 2nd Edition, Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer Associates, USA.
3. FAO, 1990. Micronutrient. Assessment at the Country level: An International Study. FAO Soil Bulletin by Mikko Sillanpaa, Rome. Follet, R.H., 1969. Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu in Colorado Soils. Ph. D. Dissertation. Colo. State Univ.
4. FAO, 2006. Guidelines for soil description. Food And Agriculture Organization of The United Nations, Publishing Management Service, Fourth edition, Rome, ISBN 92-5-105521-1, 38 p.
5. Forcada, F.C., Reig, G., Mestre L., Mignard, P., Betran, A.J., Moreno A., 2020. Scion _ Rootstock Response on Production, Mineral Composition and Fruit Quality under Heavy-Calcareous Soil and Hot Climate. Agronomy 1-22 ; doi: 10.3390/agronomy 10081159.
6. Hernández, F., Pinochet, J., Moreno, M.A., Martínez, J.J., Legua, P., 2010. Performance of Prunus rootstocks for apricot in Mediterranean conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 124:354–359.
7. Jimenesa, I.M., Mayerb, N.A., Diasa, S.T.C., Filhoa, S.A.J., Silvaa, R.S., 2018. Influence of clonal rootstocks on leaf nutrient content, vigor and productivity of young ‘Sunraycer’ nectarine trees. Scientia Horticulture, 235 (2018) 279–285.
8. Kacar, B., İnal, A., 2008. Bitki Analizleri. Nobel Yayınları, 1241: 120-164, Ankara.

9. Klute, A,. 1986. “Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods (2nd Edition)”, A. Klute, Ed., 1986, American Society of Agronomy, Agronomy Monographs 9(1), Madison, Wisconsin, 1188 pp.
10. Li, H., Yu, M., Du, X.Q., Wang, Z.F., Wu, W.H., Quintero, F.J., Jin, X.H., Li, H.D., Wang, Y., 2017. NRT1.5/ NPF7.3 functions as a proton-coupled Hş/Kş antiporter for Kş loading into the xylem in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 29 (8):2016–26. doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00972.
11. Lillehand, O., Mcollam, M. E., 1961. Fertilizing Western Orchards. Better Crops with Plant Food 45 (4): 46-48.
12. Loue, A., 1968. Diagnostic Petiolaire de Prospection. Edutes Sur la Nutrition et al Fertilisation Potassiques de la Vigne. Societe Commercialedes Potassesd’Alsace Services Agromiques, 31-41.
13. Marschner, P., 2012. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 3rd Ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.
14. Mayer, N., Ueno, B., Silva, V.A.L., Valgas, R.A., Silveria, C.A.P., 2015. A morte precoce do pessegueiro associada _a fertilidade do solo. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 37 (3):773–87. doi: 10.1590/0100-2945-156/14.
15. Mestre, L., Reig, G., Betrán, J., Pinochet, J., Moreno, M. A., 2015. Influence of Peach–Almond Hybrids and Plum-Based Rootstocks on Mineral Nutrition and Yield Characteristics of ‘Big Top’Nectarine in Replant and Heavy-Calcareous Soil Conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 192: 475-481.
16. Mestre, L., Reig G., Betrán, J., Moreno, M.A., 2017. Influence of plum rootstocks on agronomic performance, leaf mineral nutrition and fruit quality of ‘Catherina’ peach cultivar in heavy-calcareous soil conditions. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2017151-9950.
17. Nawaz, M.A., Imtiaz, M., Kong, Q., Cheng, F., Ahmed, W., Huang, Y., and Bie, Z., 2016. Grafting: A technique to modify ion accumulation in horticultural crops. Front. Plant Sci, 7:1457.
18. Olsen, S.R., Cole, V., Watanabe, F.S., Dean, L.A., 1954. Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate, U.S.A.
19. Rehm, G., Schmitt, M., Eliason, R., 1996. Fertilizing Corn in Minnesota. University of Minnesota College of Agricultural Food and Environmental Science, Minnesota Extension Service, FO-3790-C, Reviewed.
20. Reig G., Salazara A., Zarrouka O., Forcadaa, C.F., Valb, J., Moreno, M.A., 2019. Long-term graft compatibility study of peach-almond hybrid and plum based rootstocks budded with European and Japanese plums. Scientia Horticulture, 243 (2019) 392–400.
21. Richards, L.A., 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook. 60: 105-106.
22. Sannoveld, C., Van Dijk, P. A., 1982. The Effectiveness of Some Washing Procedures On The Removal Of Contaminants From Plant Tissue of Glasshouse Crops. Soil Sci. Plant Annual., 13: 487-496.
23. Savvas, D., Papastavrou, D., Ntatsi, G., Ropokis, A., Olympios, C., Hartmann, H., and Schwarz, D., 2009. Interactive effects of grafting and manganese supply on growth, yield, and nutrient uptake by tomato. Hort. Science, 44:1978–1982.
24. Shahkoomahally, S., Chaparro, J., 2020. Influence of Rootstocks on Leaf Mineral Content in the Subtropical Peach cv. Peach cv. UFSun. HORTSCIENCE, 55(4):496–502. 2020. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14626-19.
25. Steyn, W. J. A., 1961. Leaf Analysis. Errors Involved in The Preparative Phase. J. Agr. Food. Chem., 7:344-348.
26. Taaren, M.J., Abbasi, A.N., Rahman, H., 2016. Tree vigor, nutrients uptake efficiency and yield of ‘Flordaking’ peach cultivar as affected by different rootstocks. Proceedings of Pakistan Society for Horticultural Science, 134-143.
27. Tomaz, M.A., Martinez, H.E.P., Cruz, C.D., Freitas R.S., Pereira, A.A., Sakiyama, N.S., 2009. Efficiency of absorption and use of nitrogen, phosphorus and sulphur on grafted coffee plants cultivated in pots. Science and Agrotechnology, 33:12–20.
28. Tombesi, S., Almehdi, A., DeJong, T.M., 2011. Phenotyping vigour control capacity of new peach rootstocks by xylem vessel analysis. Scientia Hort, 127:353–357.
29. Uğur R., Kargı, S.P., 2018. Investigation of the propagation possibilities some wild plum genotypes that obtained by selection breeding. İnternational Journal on Mathematic, Engineering and Natural Science, 2(4): 121-128.
30. Ullah, S., Jan, A., Ali, M., Ahmad, A., Ullah, A., Ahmad, G., Afridi, K., Ishag, M., Saeed, M., Riaz, A., 2017. Effect of phosphorous and zinc under different application methods on yield attributes of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Research, 3:79–85.
31. USDA, 1998. Soil Quality Indicators: pH. Soil Quality Information Sheet. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052208.pdf (date of access: 25.12.2018).
32. USDA, 2011. Soil Quality Indicators. Soil Electrical Conductivity. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detailfull/soils/health/assessment/?cid=stelprdb1237387/nrcs142p2_053136.pdf (date of access: 25.12.2020).
33. Ülgen, N., Yurtsever, N., 1995.Turkey Fertilizer Guide. Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute Publications, General Publication No: 209, Technical Publications No: T.66, Ankara.
34. Yahmed, B.J., Ghrab M., Benmousa, H., Mimoun, B.M., 2020. Nutritional status of stone fruit trees on dwarfing and vigorous rootstocks under warm Mediterranean conditions. Acta Hortic, 1281. ISHS 2020. DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic. 2020.1281.45.334.346.