BibTex RIS Cite

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in vitro micropropagation

Year 2014, Volume: 1 Issue: Özel Sayı-1, 1304 - 1309, 01.03.2014

Abstract

This research was undertaken to determine chickpea in vitro micropropagation optimal conditions from preexisting meristems. Three genotypes; Zouaoui, ILC 483 and INRA 199 mature embryos and nodes were cultivated on Murashige and Sckoog (1962) medium without plant growth regulators and with NAA (Naphtyl acetic acid) /BAP (Benzyl amino purine) (0.5/4.5mg/l) and KIN (Kinetin) (0.5, 1mg/l).Explant morphogenetic response was recorded after one month incubation. Results were expressed as direct regeneration frequency (shoot and root development from embryos and axillary buds from nodes). Zouaoui genotype was more callogenic (42.57%) than INRA 199 (32.12%) and ILC 483 (23.43%). Among media, MS without hormones was suitable to induce preexisting meristems development (76.16%), whereas MS with NAA/BAP was favorable to callus formation (70.95%). Indirect buds formation was accomplished on MS added with 0.5mg/l KIN via callusing on mature embryos

References

  • Aasim M., Day S., Rezaei F., Hajizadeh M., Mahmud, St, Ozcan S. In vitro shoot regeneration from preconditioned explants of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. Gokce. African 10(11):2020–2023, 2011.
  • Biotechnology., Ali G., Hadi F., Tariq M., Ali Khan A. Callus induction and in vitro complete plant regeneration of different cultivars of tobacco (NicotiNAA tabacum L.) on media of different hormonal concentrations. Biotechnology. 6(4): 561- 566, 2007.
  • Altaf N., Iqbal J., Salih Ahmed M. Tissue culture of microsperma lentis (Lens culinaris Medik) cv.massoor-85. Pak. J. Bot. 31(2):283-292, 1999.
  • Anwar F., Sharmila P., Pardha Saradhi P. No more recalcitrant: Chickpea regeneration and genetic transformation. African Journal of Biotechnology. 9(6): 782-797, 2010. HS. Arora A, Chawla Organogenic
  • plant regeneration via callus induction in chickpea (Cicer arietinum Role of genotypes, growth regulators and explants . Indian Journal of Biotechnology. 4:251-256, 2005.
  • FAOSTAT. Food and Agricultural Organization of United the
  • http://www.fao.org/faostat. 2012 consulted august 19th 2014.
  • Nations, Huda S., Siddique N.A., Khatun N., Rahman M.H., Morshed M. Regeneration of shoot from cotyledon derived callus of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 6(15):1310-1313, 2003.
  • Islam R., Farooqui H., Raizuddin S. In vitro genotype phytohormone interaction in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Tissue Culture. 8(1): 173-175, 1998.
  • sativum).PLANT SOIL ENVIRON.50 (4): 182– 187, 2004. pea
  • (Pisum Kumar M., Shukla A.K., Singh H., Verma P.C., Singh P.V. Genotype-independent Agrobacterium mediated transformation of germinated embryo of cotton (Gossypium airsutum L.). International Journal of Bio-Technology and Research. 3(1): 91-90, 2013.
  • Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum. 15:473- 497, 1962.
  • Naz S, Ali A., Ahmed Siddique F., Iqbal J.Somatic embryogenesis from immature cotyledons and leaf calli of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany. 48(2), 523- 531, 2008.
  • Nunes C., F., Dos Santo D., Nazare P. Morphogenesis
  • adventitious shoots in Jatropha curcas L. of Australian Journal of Crop Science. 7 (10): 1511-1519, 2013.
  • Ochatt S.J., Atif R.M., Patat- Ochatt E., Jacas M., Conreux
  • Recalcitrance for in vitro Regeneration. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 6 (5): 630-634 2010.
  • versus Rao B.G., Chopra V.L.. Genotypic and explants differences in
  • maintenance in chickpea. International Chickpea Newsletter. 17:10-12, 1987.
  • Sagare A. P., Suhasini K., Krishnamurthy K.V. Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Cell Reports. 12:652-655, 1993.
  • Sané D., Aberlanc- Bertossi F, Diatta L. I. D., GUÈYE B, DAHER A., SAGNA M., BOGEL A. Influence of growth regulators on callogenesis and somatic embryo development in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) sahalian cultivars. The Scientific World Journal. Article ID 837395: 1-8, 2012.
  • Sani L., Mustapha Y.. Effect of genotype and 2, 4- d concentration on callogenesis in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids). Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences. 3(1): 238–240, 2010.
  • Texeira L.R., Braccini A.L., Churata B.G.M., Vieira E.S.N., Martins P.K., Schuster I. Evaluation of soybean cultivars on the embryogenic and organogenic potential .Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy Maringá. 33(1): 67-74, 2011.
  • Weerakoon S.R. Direct and Indirect Somatic Embryogenesis from Petiole and Leaf Explants of Purple Fan Flower (Scaevola aemula R. Br. cv. 'Purple Fanfare'). World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 5:701-709, 2010.
  • Yadav S.K., Katikala S., Yellisetty V., Kannepalle A., Naraynaa J.L., Maddi V, Mandapaka M., Shanker A.K., Venkateswarlu Bandi V., Kirti Pulugurtha Bharadwaja K.P.Optimization of Agrobacterium transformation
  • explants of Vigna radiate. Springerplus. 1(1) 59:1-8, 2012 genetic node of cotyledonary
  • Zaman M.A, Manjur Abmk, Ahmed M., Islam M. M.. Effect of 2, 4-D on Callus Induction and Subsequent Morphogenesis in Mature Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Embryo Culture, Proc. Sixth Intl. Plant Tissue Cult. & Biotech. Conf., Bangladesh Assoc. Plant Tissue Culture and Biotechnologiy. 53-58, 2010.
  • Zare Mirakabad H., Bagheri A.R., Zare Mehrjerdi M. Efficient protocol for break impasses of regeneration via callus for 20 genotypes of chickpea. International Journal of Plant Production., 4 (2), 115-128, 2010.
  • Zouzou M., Kouakou T.H., Koné M., Amani N.G., Kouadio Y.J. Effect of genotype, explants, growth regulators and sugars on callus induction in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2(1): 1-9 (2008).
  • Zrÿd J.P. Cultures de cellules, tissus et organes Fondements végétaux. utilisations
  • polytechniques romandes (Eds.) 308pp., 1988.Ball, D.M., Collins, M., Lacefield G.D., Martin, NP., Mertens, D.A., Olson, K.E., Putnam, D.H., Undersander, D.J., Wolf, M.W., 2001. Understanding forage quality. American théoriques
  • Publication, 1-01, Park Ridge, IL. et pratiques. Presses Bureau Federation

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in vitro micropropagation

Year 2014, Volume: 1 Issue: Özel Sayı-1, 1304 - 1309, 01.03.2014

Abstract

References

  • Aasim M., Day S., Rezaei F., Hajizadeh M., Mahmud, St, Ozcan S. In vitro shoot regeneration from preconditioned explants of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cv. Gokce. African 10(11):2020–2023, 2011.
  • Biotechnology., Ali G., Hadi F., Tariq M., Ali Khan A. Callus induction and in vitro complete plant regeneration of different cultivars of tobacco (NicotiNAA tabacum L.) on media of different hormonal concentrations. Biotechnology. 6(4): 561- 566, 2007.
  • Altaf N., Iqbal J., Salih Ahmed M. Tissue culture of microsperma lentis (Lens culinaris Medik) cv.massoor-85. Pak. J. Bot. 31(2):283-292, 1999.
  • Anwar F., Sharmila P., Pardha Saradhi P. No more recalcitrant: Chickpea regeneration and genetic transformation. African Journal of Biotechnology. 9(6): 782-797, 2010. HS. Arora A, Chawla Organogenic
  • plant regeneration via callus induction in chickpea (Cicer arietinum Role of genotypes, growth regulators and explants . Indian Journal of Biotechnology. 4:251-256, 2005.
  • FAOSTAT. Food and Agricultural Organization of United the
  • http://www.fao.org/faostat. 2012 consulted august 19th 2014.
  • Nations, Huda S., Siddique N.A., Khatun N., Rahman M.H., Morshed M. Regeneration of shoot from cotyledon derived callus of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 6(15):1310-1313, 2003.
  • Islam R., Farooqui H., Raizuddin S. In vitro genotype phytohormone interaction in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Tissue Culture. 8(1): 173-175, 1998.
  • sativum).PLANT SOIL ENVIRON.50 (4): 182– 187, 2004. pea
  • (Pisum Kumar M., Shukla A.K., Singh H., Verma P.C., Singh P.V. Genotype-independent Agrobacterium mediated transformation of germinated embryo of cotton (Gossypium airsutum L.). International Journal of Bio-Technology and Research. 3(1): 91-90, 2013.
  • Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum. 15:473- 497, 1962.
  • Naz S, Ali A., Ahmed Siddique F., Iqbal J.Somatic embryogenesis from immature cotyledons and leaf calli of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany. 48(2), 523- 531, 2008.
  • Nunes C., F., Dos Santo D., Nazare P. Morphogenesis
  • adventitious shoots in Jatropha curcas L. of Australian Journal of Crop Science. 7 (10): 1511-1519, 2013.
  • Ochatt S.J., Atif R.M., Patat- Ochatt E., Jacas M., Conreux
  • Recalcitrance for in vitro Regeneration. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 6 (5): 630-634 2010.
  • versus Rao B.G., Chopra V.L.. Genotypic and explants differences in
  • maintenance in chickpea. International Chickpea Newsletter. 17:10-12, 1987.
  • Sagare A. P., Suhasini K., Krishnamurthy K.V. Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Cell Reports. 12:652-655, 1993.
  • Sané D., Aberlanc- Bertossi F, Diatta L. I. D., GUÈYE B, DAHER A., SAGNA M., BOGEL A. Influence of growth regulators on callogenesis and somatic embryo development in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) sahalian cultivars. The Scientific World Journal. Article ID 837395: 1-8, 2012.
  • Sani L., Mustapha Y.. Effect of genotype and 2, 4- d concentration on callogenesis in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids). Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences. 3(1): 238–240, 2010.
  • Texeira L.R., Braccini A.L., Churata B.G.M., Vieira E.S.N., Martins P.K., Schuster I. Evaluation of soybean cultivars on the embryogenic and organogenic potential .Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy Maringá. 33(1): 67-74, 2011.
  • Weerakoon S.R. Direct and Indirect Somatic Embryogenesis from Petiole and Leaf Explants of Purple Fan Flower (Scaevola aemula R. Br. cv. 'Purple Fanfare'). World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 5:701-709, 2010.
  • Yadav S.K., Katikala S., Yellisetty V., Kannepalle A., Naraynaa J.L., Maddi V, Mandapaka M., Shanker A.K., Venkateswarlu Bandi V., Kirti Pulugurtha Bharadwaja K.P.Optimization of Agrobacterium transformation
  • explants of Vigna radiate. Springerplus. 1(1) 59:1-8, 2012 genetic node of cotyledonary
  • Zaman M.A, Manjur Abmk, Ahmed M., Islam M. M.. Effect of 2, 4-D on Callus Induction and Subsequent Morphogenesis in Mature Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Embryo Culture, Proc. Sixth Intl. Plant Tissue Cult. & Biotech. Conf., Bangladesh Assoc. Plant Tissue Culture and Biotechnologiy. 53-58, 2010.
  • Zare Mirakabad H., Bagheri A.R., Zare Mehrjerdi M. Efficient protocol for break impasses of regeneration via callus for 20 genotypes of chickpea. International Journal of Plant Production., 4 (2), 115-128, 2010.
  • Zouzou M., Kouakou T.H., Koné M., Amani N.G., Kouadio Y.J. Effect of genotype, explants, growth regulators and sugars on callus induction in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2(1): 1-9 (2008).
  • Zrÿd J.P. Cultures de cellules, tissus et organes Fondements végétaux. utilisations
  • polytechniques romandes (Eds.) 308pp., 1988.Ball, D.M., Collins, M., Lacefield G.D., Martin, NP., Mertens, D.A., Olson, K.E., Putnam, D.H., Undersander, D.J., Wolf, M.W., 2001. Understanding forage quality. American théoriques
  • Publication, 1-01, Park Ridge, IL. et pratiques. Presses Bureau Federation
There are 32 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Amina Kadırı This is me

Yamina Halfaouı This is me

Louiza Bouabdallah This is me

Zohra Ighılharız This is me

Publication Date March 1, 2014
Submission Date January 26, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 1 Issue: Özel Sayı-1

Cite

APA Kadırı, A., Halfaouı, Y., Bouabdallah, L., Ighılharız, Z. (2014). Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in vitro micropropagation. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 1(Özel Sayı-1), 1304-1309.