Because
of the large area utilized by a class A pan, alternative methods have been used
to estimate reference evapotranspiration (Eto) inside greenhouses.
The objective of this work was to compare ETo estimated by different
methods inside and outside a greenhouse. A class A pan (CAPi),
lyismeter (Li) and piche tube (PTi) were installed inside
a greenhouse, and another class A pan (CAPo) was installed outside.
ETo estimates, obtained by CAPi, PTi, and Li
were 81%, 56% and 86%of those estimated by CAPo, respectively. A
simple linear regression showed positive coefficients (R = (0.96) for the Li
and the CAPi,R = (0.95) for the PTi and the CAPi,
R = (0.88) for the CAPi and the CAPo, R = (0.96) for the
Li and the CAPo, and R = (0.82) for the PTi
and the CAPo). ETo needs to be estimated inside
greenhouses and it is possible to use lyismeter or piche tube to estimate the
ETo inside the greenhouse. Equipment replacement would increase the
available space inside the greenhouse.
Class A pan lyismeter piche tube evapotranspiration greenhouse
Bölüm | Araştırma Makaleleri |
---|---|
Yazarlar | |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 19 Ocak 2018 |
Gönderilme Tarihi | 22 Aralık 2016 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2018 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1 |