Reactions of Tetraploid Wheat Species to Septoria Tritici Blotch

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 574 - 582, 30.04.2024

Ahmet Çat

https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1378612

Abstract

Septoria tritici blotch (STB), caused by the ascomycete fungal pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici is one of the destructive diseases of wheat global scale and it causes severe yield losses in suitable conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate on the 84 tetraploid wheat species to STB disease during 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 growing seasons. The experiment was conducted randomized block design with two replications at campus of Akdeniz University. Based on the disease observations, it was determined that 39 (46.4%) of the tested genotypes showed susceptible and highly susceptible reaction in 2021, while 18 (21.4%) showed resistant and moderately resistant reaction. In addition, 44 (52.4%) of the genotypes showed susceptible and highly susceptible reaction, and 15 (17.8%) showed resistant and moderately resistant reaction in 2022. Overall, while all Polish wheat species showed highly susceptible reaction, only one emmer wheat species (T. dicoccum var. haussknechtianum) showed immune reaction in two seasons. Besides, durum wheat varieties namely Akbaşak 073/144, Çakmak 79, Altıntaş 95, Yelken 2000, Fırat-93 and Fuatbey 2000 showed resistant reaction and also no highly susceptible reaction was detected in durum wheat varieties. To sum up, identified resistant durum and emmer wheat species/varieties can be used in breeding programs to be conducted for resistance to STB disease.

Keywords

Tetraploid wheat species, septoria, disease severity, infection type, resistance

Reactions of Tetraploid Wheat Species to Septoria Tritici Blotch

Abstract

Ascomycetes fungal patojen Zymoseptoria tritici’nin neden olduğu Septoria tritici blotch (STB) buğdayın küresel düzeyde yıkıcı hastalıklarından biridir ve uygun koşullarda önemli verim ve kalite kayıplarına neden olur. Bu çalışma, 84 tetraploit buğday türünün STB hastalığına karşı dayanıklılığını belirlemek amacıyla 2020-2021 ve 2021-2022 yetiştirme sezonlarında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada kullanılan çeşitler tesadüf parselleri deneme desenine göre iki tekerrür olacak şekilde Akdeniz Üniversitesi yerleşkesinde yetiştirilmiştir. Hastalık gözlemlerine göre; 2021'de, test edilen genotiplerin 39 (%46.4) 'nun STB hastalığına karşı hassas ve çok hassas reaksiyonlar gösterdiği belirlenmiştir. Yine aynı yıl, genotiplerin 18 (%21.4)' i dayanıklı ve orta derecede dayanıklı olduğu saptanmıştır. 2022'de, genotiplerin 44 (%52.4)'ü STB hastalığına karşı hassas ve çok hassas reaksiyonlar gösterirken, 15 (%17.8) 'i dayanıklı ve orta derecede dayanıklı reaksiyon göstermiştir. Özellikle tüm Polonya buğday türlerinin STB hastalığına karşı çok hassas reaksiyonlar gösterdiği belirlenmiştir. Öte yandan, bir gernik buğday türü, Triticum dicoccum var. haussknechtianum, her iki sezonda da dayanıklı olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, Akbaşak 073/144, Çakmak 79, Altıntaş 95, Yelken 2000, Fırat-93 ve Fuatbey 2000 gibi makarnalık buğday çeşitleri STB hastalığına karşı dayanıklı olduğu ve makarnalık buğday çeşitlerinde çok hassas reaksiyon saptanmamıştır. Sonuç olarak, belirlenen dayanıklı durum ve emmer buğday türleri/çeşitleri, STB hastalığına karşı dayanıklılık ıslah programlarında kullanılma potansiyeline sahiptir.

Keywords

Tetraploid buğday türleri, hastalık şiddeti, enfeksiyon tipi, dayanıklılık, septoria

References

• Ababa, G., Adugna, G. and Hundie, B. 2022. Seedling resistance of wheat cultivars to Zymoseptoria tritici disease in Ethiopia. Indian Phytopathology, 75(4): 1043-1054.
• Akar, T. and Eser, V. 2016. Ülkemizde kavuzlu buğday üretiminin dünü bugünü ve yarını. TURKTOB Dergisi, 18, 8-11. Aouini, L. 2018. Durum wheat and septoria tritici blotch: genes and prospects for breeding, PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 281p.
• Ben M’Barek, S., Laribi, M., Kouki, H., Castillo, D., Araar, C., Nefzaoui, M., ... and Yahyaoui, A.H. 2022. Phenotyping Mediterranean durum wheat landraces for resistance to Zymoseptoria tritici in Tunisia. Genes, 13(2): 355.
• Brown, J.K., Chartrain, L., Lasserre-Zuber, P. and Saintenac, C. 2015. Genetics of resistance to Zymoseptoria tritici and applications to wheat breeding. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 79: 33-41.
• Chu, C.G., Friesen, T.L., Faris, J.D. and Xu, S.S. 2008. Evaluation of seedling resistance to tan spot and Stagonospora nodorum blotch in tetraploid wheat. Crop Science, 48(3): 1107-1116.
• Clarke, J.M., Clarke, F.R. and Pozniak, C.J. 2010. Forty-six years of genetic improvement in Canadian durum wheat cultivars. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 90(6): 791-801.
• Coşkun, İ., Tekin, M. and Akar, T. 2019. Türkiye kökenli diploid ve tetraploid kavuzlu buğday hatlarının bazı agro-morfolojik özellikler bakımından tanımlanması. Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2): 322-334.
• Dalvand, M., Roohparvar, R., Aeini, M., 2014. Evaluation of some iranian wheat elite lines’ reaction to Septoria tritici leaf blotch. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 47(13): 1621-1628
• Eyal Z, Scharen A.L., Prescott J.M., van Ginkel M. 1987. The septoria diseases of wheat: Concepts and methods of disease management. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT
• Eyal, Z. 1999. Breeding for resistance to Septoria and Stagonospora diseases of wheat. Septoria on Cereals: A Study of Pathosystems. JA Lucas, P. Bowyer, and AM Anderson, eds. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 115-130. FAO. 2021. Crops and livestock products. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (Accessed date: 10.10.2023).
• Fones, H. and Gurr, S. 2015. The impact of Septoria tritici Blotch disease on wheat: An EU perspective. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 79: 3-7.
• Gultyaeva, E., Yusov, V., Rosova, M., Mal’chikov, P., Shaydayuk, E., Kovalenko, N., ... and Rsaliyev, A. 2020. Evaluation of resistance of spring durum wheat germplasm from Russia and Kazakhstan to fungal foliar pathogens. Cereal Research Communications, 48: 71-79.
• Kashyap, P.L., Gupta, V., Gupta, O.P., Sendhil, R., Gopalareddy, K., Jasrotia, P. and Singh, G.P. (Eds.). (2022). New Horizons in Wheat and Barley Research: Global Trends, Breeding and Quality Enhancement (p. 842). Singapore: Springer.
• Kokhmetova, A., Sehgal, D., Ali, S., Atishova, M., Kumarbayeva, M., Leonova, I. and Dreisigacker, S. 2021. Genome-wide association study of tan spot resistance in a hexaploid wheat collection from Kazakhstan. Frontiers in Genetics, 11: 581214.
• Kolesova, M. A., Lysenko, N. S. and Tyryshkin, L. G. 2022. Resistance to diseases in samples of rare wheat species from the NI Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources. Cereal Research Communications, 50(2): 287-296.
• Levy, A.A. and Feldman, M. 2004. Genetic and epigenetic reprogramming of the wheat genome upon allopolyploidization. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 82(4): 607-613.
• Linde, C.C., Zhan, J. and McDonald, B.A. 2002. Population structure of Mycosphaerella graminicola: from lesions to continents. Phytopathology, 92(9): 946-955.
• Martínez, F., Sillero, J. C. and Rubiales, D. 2007. Resistance to leaf rust in cultivars of bread wheat and durum wheat grown in Spain. Plant Breeding, 126(1): 13-18.
• Miedaner, T. and Longin, C.F.H. (2013. Genetic variation for resistance to Fusarium head blight in winter durum material. Crop and Pasture Science, 65(1): 46-51.
• Omrani, A., Roohparvar, R. and Shahbazi, K. 2023. Resistance of commercial wheat cultivars to Septoria leaf blotch Zymoseptoria tritici in Moghan region. Journal of Applied Research in Plant Protection, 1-12.
• Quaedvlieg, W., Kema, G. H. J., Groenewald, J. Z., Verkley, G. J. M., Seifbarghi, S., Razavi, M., … and Crous, P. W. 2011. Zymoseptoria gen. Nov.: A new genus to accommodate Septoria-like species occurring on graminicolous hosts. Persoonia-Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi, 26(1): 57-69.
• Rudnóy, S., Páldi, E., Bratek, Z., Szegő, D., Rácz, I. and Lásztity, D. 2004. ITS regions in hexaploid bread wheat and its supposed progenitors.Cereal Research Communications, 32: 423-428.
• Saari, E.E. and Prescott, J.M. 1975. A scale for appraising the foliar intensity of wheat diseases. Plant Disease Reporter, 59(5): 377-380.
• Shewry, P.R. 2009. Wheat. Journal of experimental botany, 60(6): 1537-1553.
• Shewry, P.R. and Hey, S. 2015. Do “ancient” wheat species differ from modern bread wheat in their contents of bioactive components?. Journal of Cereal Science, 65: 236-243.
• Singh, R. P., Huerta-Espino, J. and William, H.M. 2005. Genetics and breeding for durable resistance to leaf and stripe rusts in wheat. Turk J Agric For 29: 121-127.
• Singh, P. K., Mergoum, M., Ali, S., Adhikari, T.B., Elias, E.M. and Hughes, G.R. 2006. Identification of new sources of resistance to tan spot, Stagonospora nodorum blotch, and Septoria tritici blotch of wheat. Crop Science, 46(5): 2047-2053.
• Sissons, M. 2008. Role of durum wheat composition on the quality of pasta and bread. Food, 2 (2), 75-90. TUIK, 2022. Crop Production Statistics. Turkish Statistical Institute, (https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas), (Accessed date: 10.10.2023)
• Wiwart, M., Suchowilska, E., Kandler, W., Sulyok, M., Groenwald, P. and Krska, R. 2013. Can Polish wheat (Triticum polonicum L.) be an interesting gene source for breeding wheat cultivars with increased resistance to Fusarium head blight?. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 60: 2359-2373.
• Xu, S. S., Friesen, T. L. and Mujeeb‐Kazi, A. 2004. Seedling resistance to tan spot and Stagonospora nodorum blotch in synthetic hexaploid wheats. Crop Science, 44(6): 2238-2245.
• Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. and Konzak, C.F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed research, 14(6): 415-421.
• Zaharieva, M., Ayana, N.G., Hakimi, A.A., Misra, S.C. and Monneveux, P. 2010. Cultivated emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccon Schrank), an old crop with promising future: a review. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 57: 937-962.