Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Assessing Pre-service Science Teachers’ Perceptions about Online Teaching and Learning

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 93 - 111, 30.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.52134/ueader.1245351

Öz

The unique nature of online teaching and learning has its own affordances and challenges. The purpose of this study was to assess science pre-service teachers’ perceptions about efficiency of online teaching and learning in science after experiencing it first-hand during the hard lockdowns due to Covid-19 pandemic. Mixed methods approach, with closed and open-ended questionnaires, was adopted to establish: What perceptions the pre-service teachers have about online teaching and learning in respect of effective teaching and effective assessment? What correlations can be drawn from pre-service science teachers experience of online teaching and learning with their perceptions? And to what extent this mode of teaching prepared these pre-service teachers to use it in their teaching practice? Descriptive statistics and content analysis of data revealed that participants rated online teaching and learning low and had a challenging experience in terms of collaboration, access to material and making meanings out of some science concepts. Participants reported low confidence relating to perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of online teaching and learning. The study concludes that the harsh experiences were the main contributing factors to the observed perceptions of participants as neither the lecturers nor these student-teachers were prepared for this mode of teaching and learning. Therefore, this study recommends that support mechanisms for students should be made available for online teaching and learning even under emergency situations. Pre-service teachers should also be given a chance to experience online teaching and learning under normal circumstances if they are to incorporate it in their teaching.

Destekleyen Kurum

We had no direct support from the institution. The work in the article is part of our research activities as academics

Proje Numarası

None

Teşekkür

We acknowledge participants for their time and effort to complete the questionnaires

Kaynakça

  • Önal, A., & Özdemir, A. (2021). An investigation into pre-service teachers’ online learning climate perceptions. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(2), 310-333. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.927998
  • Alexander, M. W., Truell, A. D., & Zhao, J. J. (2012). Expected advantages and disadvantages of online learning: Perceptions from college students who have not taken online courses. Issues in Information Systems, 13(2), 193-200.
  • Al-Salman, S. & Haider, A. S. (2021). Jordanian University students' views on emergency online Learning during COVID-19. Online Learning, 25(1), 286-302. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2470
  • Alvarez, A. J., & Corcuera, L. (2021). The webinar experiences of higher education instructors in the time of emergency remote education. International Journal of Scholars in Education, 4(2), 134-145. https://doi.org/10.52134/ueader.983093
  • Arbaugh, J.B. (2005). A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(4), 531-563. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562904271199
  • Ardiyansah, T. Y. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ perceived readiness in teaching online in international internship program. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 8(1), 90-102. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v8i1.16456
  • Bordens, K. S., & Abbott, B. B. (2011). Research design and methods, a process approach (8th ed.). The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
  • Chuttur, M. (2009). Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, developments and future directions. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37), 1-21. http://sprouts.aisnet.org/9-37
  • Cobanoglu, A. A. & Cobanoglu, I. (2021). Do Turkish student teachers feel ready for online learning in post-covid times? A study of online learning readiness. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 270-280. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.961847
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education (5th ed.). RoutledgeFalmer. Corcuera, L.C., & Alvarez, A.V. (2021). Teacher's roadblocks in the time of quarantine teaching. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 7(4), 427-434. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.1003162 Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Chung, R., & Frelow, F. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach? Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 286-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053004002
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • DeCoito, I. & Estaiteyeh, M. (2022). Transitioning to online teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic: An exploration of STEM teachers’ views, successes, and challenges. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(3), 340-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09958-z
  • Dolenc, K., Šorgo, A., & Ploj Virtič, M. (2021). The difference in views of educators and students on forced online distance education can lead to unintentional side effects. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7079-7105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10558-4
  • Farrah, M., & Al-Bakry, G. H. (2020). Online learning for EFL students in Palestinian universities during corona pandemic: Advantages, challenges and solutions. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 3(2), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.25134/ijli.v3i2.3677
  • Feldman, J. (2020). An ethics of care: PGCE students' experiences of online learning during Covid-19. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning (CriSTaL), 8(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.14426/cristal.v8i2.326
  • Hassan, M. (2021). Online teaching challenges during covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(1), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.1.1487
  • Herkulaas, M., & Oosthuizen, L. L. (2020). First-year student transition at the University of the Free State during COVID‑19: Challenges and insights. Journal of Student Affairs in Africa. 8(2), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.24085/jsaa.v8i2.4446
  • Kalaycıoğlu, D. B., ömer Toprak, A., Eyerci, C., Zeynep, U. G. U. R., Ayşe, G. Ü. Ç., Yildiz, S. & Çelikkaya, R. (2022). Academics’ perception and practices of online education during the Covid-19 pandemic: The case of Turkey. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5(1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.975896
  • Khan, M.A., Vivek, Nabi, M.K., Khojah, M., & Tahir, M. (2021). Students’ perception towards e-learning during covid-19 pandemic in India: An empirical study. Sustainability, 13(57), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010057
  • Makafane, T., & Chere-Masopha, J. (2021). Covid-19 crisis: Challenges of online learning in one university in Lesotho. African Perspectives of Research in Teaching & Learning 5(1), 126-138. http://hdl.handle.net/10386/3299
  • Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173.
  • Modise, M. P. (2020). Continuous professional development and student support in an open and distance e-learning institution: A case study. International Journal of African Higher Education, 7(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.6017/ijahe.v7i1.10902
  • Mojtaba, V. & Sherrill, S. (2019). Theme in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3376
  • Mpungose, C. B., & Khoza, S. B. (2021). Students' reflections on the use of the zoom video conferencing technology for online learning at a South African University. International Journal of African Higher Education, 8(1), 159-178. https://doi.org/10.6017/ijahe.v8i1.13371
  • Mukhtar, K., Javed, K., Arooj, M., & Sethi, A. (2020). Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during covıd-19 pandemic era. Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 36(COVID19-S4). https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2785
  • Nsibande, R. (2020). From Use to Influence: Student evaluation of teaching and the professional development of academics in higher education. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning, 8(1), 133-152. https://doi.org/10.14426/cristal.v8i1.208
  • Pal, D., & Patra S. (2021). University students’ perception of video-based learning in times of covid-19: A TAM/TTF perspective, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(10), 903-921. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1848164
  • Samortin, M. B., Corcuera, L. C., Alvarez, A. V. Jr., & Palmero, H. R. (2022). Education and the pandemic: Examining students’ remote learning experiences in the Philippines. International Journal of Scholars in Education, 5(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.52134/ueader.1064312
  • Schreier. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. In Flick W. (Ed), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis (pp. 170-183). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Teo, T. (2010). Development and validation of the e-learning acceptance measure (ElAM). The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 148-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.02.001
  • Twesige, D., Gasheja, F., Misago, K. I., & Muvunyi, E. (2021). COVID-19’s impact on the student learning process in Rwandan higher education institutions. International Journal of African Higher Education, 8(3), 144-160.
  • Umit, I. O., & Sezginsoy, B. (2021). Distance education in the covid-19 pandemic period: opinions of primary pre-service teachers about teaching practice course. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(4), 726-744. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1016098
  • Yildirim, Ö. K. (2022) A Research about the opinions of pre-service Turkish teachers on the online education process. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5(4), 1122-1139. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1160476
  • Yuhanna I., Alexander A. & Kachik A. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of online learning. Journal Educational Verkenning. 1(2), 13-19. https://hdpublication.com/index.php/jev
  • Zylfiu, D., Gerbeshi, B. & Rasimi, D. (2020). Challenges and advantages of online learning: The case of Kosovo. International Journal of Management, 11(10), 1873-1880. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM.11.10.2020.175
Yıl 2023, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 93 - 111, 30.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.52134/ueader.1245351

Öz

Proje Numarası

None

Kaynakça

  • Önal, A., & Özdemir, A. (2021). An investigation into pre-service teachers’ online learning climate perceptions. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(2), 310-333. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.927998
  • Alexander, M. W., Truell, A. D., & Zhao, J. J. (2012). Expected advantages and disadvantages of online learning: Perceptions from college students who have not taken online courses. Issues in Information Systems, 13(2), 193-200.
  • Al-Salman, S. & Haider, A. S. (2021). Jordanian University students' views on emergency online Learning during COVID-19. Online Learning, 25(1), 286-302. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2470
  • Alvarez, A. J., & Corcuera, L. (2021). The webinar experiences of higher education instructors in the time of emergency remote education. International Journal of Scholars in Education, 4(2), 134-145. https://doi.org/10.52134/ueader.983093
  • Arbaugh, J.B. (2005). A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(4), 531-563. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562904271199
  • Ardiyansah, T. Y. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ perceived readiness in teaching online in international internship program. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 8(1), 90-102. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v8i1.16456
  • Bordens, K. S., & Abbott, B. B. (2011). Research design and methods, a process approach (8th ed.). The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
  • Chuttur, M. (2009). Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, developments and future directions. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37), 1-21. http://sprouts.aisnet.org/9-37
  • Cobanoglu, A. A. & Cobanoglu, I. (2021). Do Turkish student teachers feel ready for online learning in post-covid times? A study of online learning readiness. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 270-280. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.961847
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education (5th ed.). RoutledgeFalmer. Corcuera, L.C., & Alvarez, A.V. (2021). Teacher's roadblocks in the time of quarantine teaching. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 7(4), 427-434. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.1003162 Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Chung, R., & Frelow, F. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach? Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 286-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053004002
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • DeCoito, I. & Estaiteyeh, M. (2022). Transitioning to online teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic: An exploration of STEM teachers’ views, successes, and challenges. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(3), 340-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09958-z
  • Dolenc, K., Šorgo, A., & Ploj Virtič, M. (2021). The difference in views of educators and students on forced online distance education can lead to unintentional side effects. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7079-7105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10558-4
  • Farrah, M., & Al-Bakry, G. H. (2020). Online learning for EFL students in Palestinian universities during corona pandemic: Advantages, challenges and solutions. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 3(2), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.25134/ijli.v3i2.3677
  • Feldman, J. (2020). An ethics of care: PGCE students' experiences of online learning during Covid-19. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning (CriSTaL), 8(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.14426/cristal.v8i2.326
  • Hassan, M. (2021). Online teaching challenges during covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(1), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.1.1487
  • Herkulaas, M., & Oosthuizen, L. L. (2020). First-year student transition at the University of the Free State during COVID‑19: Challenges and insights. Journal of Student Affairs in Africa. 8(2), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.24085/jsaa.v8i2.4446
  • Kalaycıoğlu, D. B., ömer Toprak, A., Eyerci, C., Zeynep, U. G. U. R., Ayşe, G. Ü. Ç., Yildiz, S. & Çelikkaya, R. (2022). Academics’ perception and practices of online education during the Covid-19 pandemic: The case of Turkey. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5(1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.975896
  • Khan, M.A., Vivek, Nabi, M.K., Khojah, M., & Tahir, M. (2021). Students’ perception towards e-learning during covid-19 pandemic in India: An empirical study. Sustainability, 13(57), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010057
  • Makafane, T., & Chere-Masopha, J. (2021). Covid-19 crisis: Challenges of online learning in one university in Lesotho. African Perspectives of Research in Teaching & Learning 5(1), 126-138. http://hdl.handle.net/10386/3299
  • Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173.
  • Modise, M. P. (2020). Continuous professional development and student support in an open and distance e-learning institution: A case study. International Journal of African Higher Education, 7(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.6017/ijahe.v7i1.10902
  • Mojtaba, V. & Sherrill, S. (2019). Theme in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3376
  • Mpungose, C. B., & Khoza, S. B. (2021). Students' reflections on the use of the zoom video conferencing technology for online learning at a South African University. International Journal of African Higher Education, 8(1), 159-178. https://doi.org/10.6017/ijahe.v8i1.13371
  • Mukhtar, K., Javed, K., Arooj, M., & Sethi, A. (2020). Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during covıd-19 pandemic era. Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 36(COVID19-S4). https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2785
  • Nsibande, R. (2020). From Use to Influence: Student evaluation of teaching and the professional development of academics in higher education. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning, 8(1), 133-152. https://doi.org/10.14426/cristal.v8i1.208
  • Pal, D., & Patra S. (2021). University students’ perception of video-based learning in times of covid-19: A TAM/TTF perspective, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(10), 903-921. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1848164
  • Samortin, M. B., Corcuera, L. C., Alvarez, A. V. Jr., & Palmero, H. R. (2022). Education and the pandemic: Examining students’ remote learning experiences in the Philippines. International Journal of Scholars in Education, 5(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.52134/ueader.1064312
  • Schreier. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. In Flick W. (Ed), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis (pp. 170-183). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Teo, T. (2010). Development and validation of the e-learning acceptance measure (ElAM). The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 148-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.02.001
  • Twesige, D., Gasheja, F., Misago, K. I., & Muvunyi, E. (2021). COVID-19’s impact on the student learning process in Rwandan higher education institutions. International Journal of African Higher Education, 8(3), 144-160.
  • Umit, I. O., & Sezginsoy, B. (2021). Distance education in the covid-19 pandemic period: opinions of primary pre-service teachers about teaching practice course. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(4), 726-744. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1016098
  • Yildirim, Ö. K. (2022) A Research about the opinions of pre-service Turkish teachers on the online education process. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5(4), 1122-1139. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1160476
  • Yuhanna I., Alexander A. & Kachik A. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of online learning. Journal Educational Verkenning. 1(2), 13-19. https://hdpublication.com/index.php/jev
  • Zylfiu, D., Gerbeshi, B. & Rasimi, D. (2020). Challenges and advantages of online learning: The case of Kosovo. International Journal of Management, 11(10), 1873-1880. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM.11.10.2020.175
Toplam 36 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Lereko Mohafa 0000-0001-6057-8750

Mosotho J. George 0000-0003-3217-5641

Proje Numarası None
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 31 Ocak 2023
Kabul Tarihi 15 Haziran 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Mohafa, L., & George, M. J. (2023). Assessing Pre-service Science Teachers’ Perceptions about Online Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Scholars in Education, 6(1), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.52134/ueader.1245351