Research Article

Robust and Efficient Atrial Fibrillation Detection from Intracardiac Electrograms Using Minirocket

Volume: 16 Number: 1 January 31, 2024
EN TR

Robust and Efficient Atrial Fibrillation Detection from Intracardiac Electrograms Using Minirocket

Abstract

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) detection from intracardiac Electrogram (EGM) signals is a critical aspect of cardiovascular health monitoring. This study explores the application of Minirocket, a time series classification (TSC) algorithm, for robust and efficient AF detection. A comparative analysis is conducted against a deep learning approach using a subset of the dataset from Rodrigo et al. (2022). The study investigates the robustness of Minirocket in the face of shorter EGM sequences and varying training sizes, essential for real-world applications such as wearable and implanted devices. Empirical runtime analysis further assesses the efficiency of Minirocket in comparison to conventional machine learning (ML) algorithms. The results showcase Minirocket's notable performance, especially in scenarios with shorter signals and varying training sizes, making it a promising candidate for streamlined AF detection in emerging cardiovascular monitoring technologies. This research contributes to the optimization of AF detection algorithms for increased efficiency and adaptability to dynamic clinical scenarios.

Keywords

Atrial Fibrillation , Intracardiac Electrograms , Machine Learning , Time Series Classification

References

  1. Alhusseini, M. I., Abuzaid, F., Rogers, A. J., Zaman, J. A., Baykaner, T., Clopton, P., ... & Narayan, S. M. (2020). Machine learning to classify intracardiac electrical patterns during atrial fibrillation: machine learning of atrial fibrillation. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 13(8), e008160.
  2. Bayoumy, K., Gaber, M., Elshafeey, A., Mhaimeed, O., Dineen, E. H., Marvel, F. A., ... & Elshazly, M. B. (2021). Smart wearable devices in cardiovascular care: where we are and how to move forward. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 18(8), 581-599.
  3. Bentéjac, C., Csörgő, A., & Martínez-Muñoz, G. (2021). A comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54, 1937-1967.
  4. Bottou, L., Curtis, F. E., & Nocedal, J. (2018). Optimization methods for large-scale machine learning. SIAM review, 60(2), 223-311.
  5. Dau, H., Bagnall, A., Kamgar, K., Yeh, M., Zhu, Y., Gharghabi, S., Ratanamahatana, C., Chotirat, A., & Keogh, E. (2019). The UCR time series archive. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 6(6), 1293–1305.
  6. Dempster, A., Petitjean, F., & Webb, G. I. (2020a). ROCKET: exceptionally fast and accurate time series classification using random convolutional kernels. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 34(5), 1454-1495.
  7. Dempster, A. (2020b). A Very Fast (Almost) Deterministic Transform for Time Series Classification Angus Dempster, Daniel F. Schmidt, Geoffrey I. Webb. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.08791.
  8. Fulcher, B. D., Little, M. A., & Jones, N. S. (2013). Highly comparative time-series analysis: the empirical structure of time series and their methods. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 10(83), 20130048.
  9. Fulcher, B. D., & Jones, N. S. (2017). hctsa: A computational framework for automated time-series phenotyping using massive feature extraction. Cell systems, 5(5), 527-531.
  10. Haissaguerre, M., Marcus, F. I., Fischer, B., & Clementy, J. (1994). Radiofrequency catheter ablation in unusual mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: report of three cases. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 5(9), 743-751.
APA
Alagoz, C. (2024). Robust and Efficient Atrial Fibrillation Detection from Intracardiac Electrograms Using Minirocket. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 16(1), 432-447. https://doi.org/10.29137/umagd.1409437