Research Article

Comparison of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Stroke Prediction

Volume: 17 Number: 1 March 15, 2025
EN TR

Comparison of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Stroke Prediction

Abstract

The early diagnosis and management of diseases in medicine have become critically important in today's world. This comparative thesis focuses on evaluating models developed using various machine learning and deep learning techniques (Logistic Regression, Decision Trees, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, CNN 1-D, LSTM 1-D, BİLSTM 1-D) to determine the risk of stroke. The obtained highest accuracy values are as follows: LR (0.96), DT (0.95), RF (0.95), SVM (0.96), CNN (0.9442), LSTM (0.9442), BİLSTM (0.9442). The study analyzes a dataset containing various clinical parameters (age, gender, hypertension, heart disease, marital status, occupation type, residence type, average glucose level, BMI, and smoking) using the healthcare-dataset-stroke-data/Fedesoriano. This comparative research aims to make a significant contribution to the field of health by evaluating the effectiveness of different machine learning and deep learning models in determining the risk of stroke.

Keywords

“Health, Stroke, Machine learning, Deep learning, Data analysis”

References

  1. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5-32.
  2. Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1986). Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole.
  3. Chandra, B., Kausalya, K., & Ciddarth, R. M. (2023, February). Prognosis of stroke using machine learning algorithms. In 2023 7th International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
  4. Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20, 273–297.
  5. Dietterich, T. G. (2000, June). Ensemble methods in machine learning. In International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems (pp. 1-15). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  6. Emon, M. U., Keya, M. S., Meghla, T. I., Rahman, M. M., Al Mamun, M. S., & Kaiser, M. S. (2020, November). Performance analysis of machine learning approaches in stroke prediction. In 2020 4th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA) (pp. 1464-1469). IEEE.
  7. Federisino (2021). Stroke prediction dataset [Data set]. Kaggle. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/fedesoriano/stroke-prediction dataset
  8. Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735-1780. Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied Logistic Regression (3rd ed.). Wiley.
  9. Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24(6), 417-441.
  10. Iglewicz, B., & Hoaglin, D. C. (1993). How to detect and handle outliers. Sage Publications.
APA
Yakut, S., & Barışçı, N. (2025). Comparison of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Stroke Prediction. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 17(1), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.29137/umagd.1432162
AMA
1.Yakut S, Barışçı N. Comparison of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Stroke Prediction. IJERAD. 2025;17(1):11-27. doi:10.29137/umagd.1432162
Chicago
Yakut, Süphan, and Necaattin Barışçı. 2025. “Comparison of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Stroke Prediction”. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development 17 (1): 11-27. https://doi.org/10.29137/umagd.1432162.
EndNote
Yakut S, Barışçı N (March 1, 2025) Comparison of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Stroke Prediction. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development 17 1 11–27.
IEEE
[1]S. Yakut and N. Barışçı, “Comparison of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Stroke Prediction”, IJERAD, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 11–27, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.29137/umagd.1432162.
ISNAD
Yakut, Süphan - Barışçı, Necaattin. “Comparison of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Stroke Prediction”. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development 17/1 (March 1, 2025): 11-27. https://doi.org/10.29137/umagd.1432162.
JAMA
1.Yakut S, Barışçı N. Comparison of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Stroke Prediction. IJERAD. 2025;17:11–27.
MLA
Yakut, Süphan, and Necaattin Barışçı. “Comparison of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Stroke Prediction”. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, vol. 17, no. 1, Mar. 2025, pp. 11-27, doi:10.29137/umagd.1432162.
Vancouver
1.Süphan Yakut, Necaattin Barışçı. Comparison of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Stroke Prediction. IJERAD. 2025 Mar. 1;17(1):11-27. doi:10.29137/umagd.1432162