Investigation of the Effect of Phase Plans on Network Performance Criteria in Transportation Networks Consisting of Coordinated Signalized Intersections

Year 2026, Volume: 18 Issue: 2 , 24 - 37 , 28.03.2026

Cenk Ozan , Özgür Başkan

https://doi.org/10.29137/ijerad.1882185

https://izlik.org/JA54MG88UU

Abstract

In developing cities, traffic problems caused by rapid urban growth and increasing private car usage have a direct and indirect effect on users on the urban transportation systems. It is an established fact that intersections-defined as the points at which traffic flows intersect-are fundamental components of urban transportation networks. However, if not operated correctly, these intersections can induce congestion. Signalized intersections are a common component of urban transportation networks, improving performance and safety. The fundamental signal parameters of signalized intersections-cycle time, green phase, and offset-affect vehicle delays and so the performance of the network. Literature often states that phase plans and the number of phases are important parameters affecting intersection and transportation network performance. This study developed the DIFET model by combining the Differential Evolution optimisation method and the Transyt-7F traffic model to determine phase plans' effect on network performance in coordinated signalized networks. The Transyt-7F performance index value was selected as the performance criterion. The model was tested on a network of 9 intersections. The analysis results show that phase plans and the number of phases significantly affect network performance. Left-turn ratios must be considered with traffic volumes in the approach lanes to the intersections when selecting phase plans.

Keywords

Coordinated Signalization , Signal Phase Plan , Heuristic Optimization , Vehicle Delay , Transportation Network Performance

References

• Abbaspour, S., Lindén, M., Gholamhosseini, H., Naber, A., & Ortiz-Catalan, M. (2020). Evaluation of surface EMG-based recognitionalgorithms for decoding hand movements. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 58(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-019-02073-z
• Alharthi, A. S., Yunas, S. U., & Ozanyan, K. B. (2019). Deep Learning for Monitoring of Human Gait: A Review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 19(21), 9575–9591. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2019.2928777
• Aviles, M., Rodríguez-Reséndiz, J., & Ibrahimi, D. (2023a). Optimizing EMG Classification through Metaheuristic Algorithms. Technologies, 11(4), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11040087
• Aviles, M., Rodríguez-Reséndiz, J., & Ibrahimi, D. (2023b). Optimizing EMG Classification through Metaheuristic Algorithms. Technologies, 11(4), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11040087
• Baker, R. (2007). The history of gait analysis before the advent of modern computers. Gait & Posture, 26(3), 331–342. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.10.014
• Bhoi, A. K., Sherpa, K. S., & Mallick, P. K. (2014). A comparative analysis of neuropathic and healthy EMG signal using PSD. 2014 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing, 1375–1379. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSP.2014.6950074
• Chahid, I., Elmiad, A. K., & Badaoui, M. (2023). Data Preprocessing For Machine Learning Applications in Healthcare: A Review. 2023 14th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications (SITA), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SITA60746.2023.10373591
• Chowdhury, R. H., Reaz, M. B. I., Bin Mohd Ali, M. A., Bakar, A. A. A., Chellappan, K., & Chang, T. G. (2013). Surface electromyography signal processing and classification techniques. In Sensors (Switzerland) (Vol. 13, Issue 9, pp. 12431–12466). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/s130912431
• De Luca, C. J., Donald Gilmore, L., Kuznetsov, M., & Roy, S. H. (2010). Filtering the surface EMG signal: Movement artifact and baseline noise contamination. Journal of Biomechanics, 43(8), 1573–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.027
• Europe launches ‘gait recognition’ pilot program to monitor border crossings | The Record from Recorded Future News. (n.d.). Retrieved June 30, 2025, from https://therecord.media/europe-gait-recognition-study-pilot-program
• Gallón, V. M., Vélez, S. M., Ramírez, J., & Bolaños, F. (2024). Comparison of machine learning algorithms and feature extraction techniques for the automatic detection of surface EMG activation timing. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 94, 106266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106266
• Gandbhir VN, Cunha B. (2020). Goniometer. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 32644411.
• Geethanjana, A., Geethanjana, H., & Hettige, B. (2024). Application of Artificial Intelligence in Prosthetics: A Review. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378907593
• Ghoussayni, S., Stevens, C., Durham, S., & Ewins, D. (2004). Assessment and validation of a simple automated method for the detection of gait events and intervals. Gait & Posture, 20(3), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GAITPOST.2003.10.001
• Gudivada, V. N., Apon, A., & Ding, J. (2017). Data Quality Considerations for Big Data and Machine Learning: Going Beyond Data Cleaning and Transformations. www.iaria.org
• Güner Şahan, P., Şahin, S., & Kaya Gülağız, F. (2024). A survey of appearance-based approaches for human gait recognition: techniques, challenges, and future directions. The Journal of Supercomputing, 80(13), 18392–18429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-06172-z
• Guo, Y., Gravina, R., Gu, X., Fortino, G., & Yang, G.-Z. (2020). EMG-based Abnormal Gait Detection and Recognition. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHMS49158.2020.9209449
• Inam, S., Harmain, S. Al, Shafique, S., Afzal, M., Rabail, A., Amin, F., & Waqar, M. (2021). A Brief Review of Strategies Used for inEMG Signal Classification. 2021 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ICAI), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAI52203.2021.9445257
• Kiehn, O., & Dougherty, K. (2013). Locomotion: Circuits and Physiology. In D. W. Pfaff (Ed.), Neuroscience in the 21st Century: From Basic to Clinical (pp. 1209–1236). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1997-6_42
• Kuduz, H. (2024). Human lower-extremity movement classification based on biomechanical sensor data: Machine learning approach. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences – Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 1378–1390. https://doi.org/10.14744/sigma.2024.00107
• Lencioni, T., Carpinella, I., Rabuffetti, M., Marzegan, A., & Ferrarin, M. (2019). Human kinematic, kinetic and EMG data during different walking and stair ascending and descending tasks. Scientific Data, 6(1), 309. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0323-z
• Liu, T., Inoue, Y., & Shibata, K. (2010). A wearable force plate system for the continuous measurement of triaxial ground reaction force in biomechanical applications. Measurement Science and Technology, 21(8), 085804. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/21/8/085804
• Lu, T. W., & Chang, C. F. (2012). Biomechanics of human movement and its clinical applications. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 28(2), S13–S25. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.KJMS.2011.08.004
• Mobarak, R., Mengarelli, A., Verdini, F., Fioretti, S., Burattini, L., & Tigrini, A. (2024). Enhanced Gait Phases Recognition by EMG and Kinematics Information Fusion and a Minimal Recording Setuping Setup. Al-Khwarizmi Engineering Journal, 20(2), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.22153/kej.2024.05.002
• Mobbs, R. J., Perring, J., Raj, S. M., Maharaj, M., Yoong, N. K. M., Sy, L. W., Fonseka, R. D., Natarajan, P., & Choy, W. J. (2022). Gait metrics analysis utilizing single-point inertial measurement units: a systematic review. In mHealth (Vol. 8). AME Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-21-17
• Muro-de-la-Herran, A., García-Zapirain, B., & Méndez-Zorrilla, A. (2014). Gait analysis methods: An overview of wearable and non-wearable systems, highlighting clinical applications. In Sensors (Switzerland) (Vol. 14, Issue 2, pp. 3362–3394). https://doi.org/10.3390/s140203362
• Nigg, B. M., & Herzog, W. (1999). Biomechanics of the musculo-skeletal system. 2nd edn. Journal of Anatomy vol. 195,Pt 2: 315–317. doi:10.1046/j.1469-7580.1999.195203152.x.
• Phinyomark, A., Phukpattaranont, P., & Limsakul, C. (2012). Feature reduction and selection for EMG signal classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(8), 7420–7431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.102
• Reaz, M. B. I., Hussain, M. S., & Mohd-Yasin, F. (2006). Techniques of EMG signal analysis: Detection, processing, classification and applications. Biological Procedures Online, 8(1), 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1251/bpo115
• Robertson, D., Caldwell, G., Hamill, J., Kamen, G., & Whittlesey, S. (2013). Research Methods in Biomechanics: Second edition (eBook).
• Saibene, F., & Minetti, A. E. (2003). Biomechanical and physiological aspects of legged locomotion in humans. In European Journal of Applied Physiology (Vol. 88, Issues 4–5, pp. 297–316). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-002-0654-9
• Sid’El Moctar, S. M., Rida, I., & Boudaoud, S. (2024). Comprehensive Review of Feature Extraction Techniques for sEMG Signal Classification: From Handcrafted Features to Deep Learning Approaches. IRBM, 45(6), 100866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irbm.2024.100866
• Soori, M., Arezoo, B., & Dastres, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in advanced robotics, a review. In Cognitive Robotics (Vol. 3, pp. 54–70). KeAi Communications Co. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogr.2023.04.001
• Tao, W., Liu, T., Zheng, R., & Feng, H. (2012). Gait analysis using wearable sensors. In Sensors (Vol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 2255–2283). https://doi.org/10.3390/s120202255
• Tenore, F. V. G., Ramos, A., Fahmy, A., Acharya, S., Etienne-Cummings, R., & Thakor, N. V. (2009). Decoding of Individuated Finger Movements Using Surface Electromyography. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 56(5), 1427–1434. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2008.2005485
• Wang, J., Dai, Y., Kang, T., & Si, X. (2021a). Research on Gait Recognition Based on Lower Limb EMG Signal. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMA52036.2021.9512759
• Wang, J., Dai, Y., Kang, T., & Si, X. (2021b). Research on Human Motion Recognition Based on Lower Limb Electromyography (EMG) Signals. 2021 IEEE 4th International Conference on Electronics Technology (ICET), 1234–1239. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET51757.2021.9451086
• Xiong, D., Zhang, D., Zhao, X., Chu, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2021). Synergy-Based Neural Interface for Human Gait Tracking With Deep Learning. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 29, 2271–2280. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3123630
• Zhang, X., Sun, S., Li, C., & Tang, Z. (2018). Impact of Load Variation on the Accuracy of Gait Recognition from Surface EMG Signals. Applied Sciences, 8(9), 1462. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8091462