Research Article

Ballistic Impact Simulation of Ceramic/Metal Armor Structures

Volume: 9 Number: 3 December 26, 2017
Kemal Arslan *, Recep Güneş
EN

Ballistic Impact Simulation of Ceramic/Metal Armor Structures

Abstract

The study presents a comparative numerical investigation on ballistic performance of ceramic/metal armor structures. 2D axisymmetric numerical model was developed for ballistic impact simulations using LS-DYNA® finite element software. The armor structures included combinations of boron carbide (B4C), Al6061-T6 and 4340 steel constituents. The interfaces in the armor structure were modelled with an epoxy resin adhesive. In order to define proper material behavior, Johnson-Holmquist-Ceramics material model for B4C and Plastic-Kinematic material model for Al6061-T6, 4340 steel and epoxy resin was used. The armor structures were subjected to 7.62 mm ogive-nosed steel projectile impact. In the first section, the influence of back plate material on the ballistic performance of the armor structure for bi-layers ceramic/metal configuration (ceramic front face and metal back plate) was investigated for Al6061-T6 and 4340 steel materials under same thickness and areal density. In the second section, the effect of removing half thickness of the metal constituent from the back plate and placing on the front face was investigated for both Al6061-T6 and 4340 steel materials. Finally, the influence of adhesive thickness on the ballistic performance of the armor structure was investigated. Perforation response of the armor structures were examined in terms of residual velocity of the projectile and damage mechanisms of the armor structure.


Keywords

Ballistic impact,Finite element analysis,Ceramic/Metal armor,Perforation

References

  1. Arias, A., Zaera, R., López-Puente, J., & Navarro, C. (2003). Numerical modeling of the impact behavior of new particulate-loaded composite materials. Composite Structures, 61, 151-159.
  2. Cronin, D.S., Bui, K., Kaufmann, C., Mclntosh, G., & Berstad, T. (2003). Implementation and validation of the Johnson-Holmquist ceramic material model in LS-DYNA. 4th European LS-DYNA Users Conference, 22-23 May, Ulm/Germany, 47-59.
  3. Chi, R., Serjouei, A., Sridhar, I., & Tan, G.E.B. (2013). Ballistic impact on bi-layer alumina/aluminium armor: A semi-analytical approach. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 52, 37-46.
  4. Flanagan, D.P., & Belytschko, T. (1981). A uniform strain hexahedron and quadrilateral and orthogonal hourglass control. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 17, 679-706.
  5. Fawaz, Z., Zheng, W., & Behdinan, K. (2004). Numerical simulation of normal and oblique ballistic impact on ceramic composite armours. Composite Structures, 63, 387-395.
  6. Gonçalves, D.P., de Melo, F.C.L., Klein, A.N., & Al-Qureshi, H.A. (2004). Analysis and investigation of ballistic impact on ceramic/metal composite armour. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 44, 307-316.
  7. Huang, C., & Chen, Y. (2016). Design and impact resistant analysis of functionally graded Al2O3–ZrO2 ceramic composite. Materials and Design, 91, 294-305.
  8. Johnson, G.R., & Holmquist, T.J. (1993). An improved computational model for brittle materials. High-Pressure Science and Technology, 981-984.
  9. Johnson, G.R., & Holmquist, T.J. (1999). Response of boron carbide subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high pressures. Journal of Applied Physics, 85, 8060-8073.
  10. Kreig, R.D., & Key, S.W. (1976). Implementation of a time dependent plasticity theory into structural computer programs. Constitutive Equations in Viscoplasticity: Computational and Engineering Aspects, eds., J.A. Stricklin and K.J. Saczalski, ASME, New York, 125-137.