Research Article

Farklı Sınıf Çimento Harcı Üretiminde Metakaolin Katkısı Kullanımının Araştırılması

Volume: 7 Number: 3 September 15, 2015
Gökhan Görhan *, Gökhan Kürklü
EN TR

Farklı Sınıf Çimento Harcı Üretiminde Metakaolin Katkısı Kullanımının Araştırılması

Abstract

In this study, it was studied physical and mechanical properties of Portland cement mortars with different strength classes and metakaolin (MK) substituted. Two different Portland cement such as CEM II/B-M 32.5 R (A cement) and CEM I 42.5 R (B cement) is used in the production of mortar samples. Metakaolin which is substituted by cement was obtained as a result with sintering of kaolin clay in five different temperatures (600, 700, 800, 900 ve 1000 oC) in the laboratory conditions. 7-day sintered metakaolin samples were conducted pozzolanic activity test and the highest pozzolanic activity index was obtained in the samples sintered at 900 oC. Then, it was substituted at a rate of 10 % and 20 % metakaolin material sintered 900 oC and it was compared with the reference cement mortar. Standard sand was used in the production and the samples were placed with vibration method in 40 x 40 x 160 mm metal mould according to TS EN 196-1. Later, 7 and 28 days water cure is applied to samples. Finally, the physical tests such as water absorption, porosity, bulk density and apparent density with the mechanical properties such as flexural strength and compressive strength were determinated. However, the ultrasound values were determinated from the samples. As a result, the highest compressive strength values were obtained from the samples with 20 % MK together A cement and 10 % MK together B cement.

Keywords

Cement,metakaolin,standard sand,sintering,kaolin

References

  1. [1] E. Başpınar, M. Kuşçu, “Karaçayır (Uşak) kaolen yatağı kaolen üretim yöntemi”, SDUGEO E-dergi, ss. 27- 35, (http://edergi.sdu.edu.tr/index.php/sdugeo/article/viewFile/3122/2715), 15.11.2014.
  2. [2] A.G. Türkmenoğlu, A. Tankut, “Use of tuffs from central Turkey as admixture in pozzolanic cements: Assessment of their petrographical properties”, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol.32, No.4, pp. 629-637, 2002.
  3. [3] Ç. Meral, “Use of perlite as a puzzolanic addition in blended cement production”, M.E.T.U., Thesis of Master of Science, 2004.
  4. [4] Ş. Yazıcı, D. Anuk, H. Ş. Arel, “Metakaolin Kullanımının Harçların Mekanik Özellikleri Üzerine Etkisi”, S. Ü. Müh. Fak. Derg., Vol.25, No.2, ss. 13-24, 2010.
  5. [5] B. Akçay, Ö. Peker, C. Şengül, M. A. , Taşdemir, “Metakaolin İçeren Betonun Kırılma Davranışı”, Beton Kongresi, İstanbul, ss. 424-435, 2013.
  6. [6] M.A. Caldarone, K.A. Gruber, R.G. Burg, “High reactivity metakaolin (HRM): a new generation mineral admixture for high performance concrete”, Concrete International, Vol.16, No.11, pp.37-40, 1994.
  7. [7] F. Curcio, B.A. DeAngelis, S. Pagliolico, “Metakaolin as a pozzolanic microfiller for high-performance mortars”, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol.28, No.6, pp. 803-809, 1998.
  8. [8] X. Qian, Z. Li, “The relationships between stress and strain for high-performance concrete with metakaolin”, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol.31, pp, 1607-1611, 2001.
  9. [9] L. Courard, A. Darimont, M. Schouterden, F. Ferauche, X. Willem, R. Degeimbre, “Durability of mortars modified with metakaolin”, Cement and Concrete Research, Vol.33, No.9, pp. 1473-1479, 2003.
  10. [10] TS EN 196-1. Çimento Deney Metotları- Bölüm 1: Dayanım (Methods of testing cement – Part 1: Determination of strength) TSE, Ankara – Turkey, 2002.
APA
Görhan, G., & Kürklü, G. (2015). Farklı Sınıf Çimento Harcı Üretiminde Metakaolin Katkısı Kullanımının Araştırılması. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 7(3), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.29137/umagd.379755