Araştırma Makalesi
PDF EndNote BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2022, Cilt 5, Sayı 1, 68 - 77, 30.06.2022
https://doi.org/10.47137/uujes.1123909

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Reference1 Charles D. Ghilani, Paul R. Wolf (2006). Adjustment Computation Spatial Data Analysis
  • Reference2 Zahraa Hussein (2019). GNSS Geodetic Network Design using Least Squares Adjustment Method Paperback
  • Reference3 Pietro Catania et all, (2020). Positioning Accuracy Comparison of GNSS Receivers Used for Mapping and Guidance of Agricultural Machines. Agronomy
  • Reference4 Mariusz Rychlicki et all. (2020). Analysis of Accuracy and Reliability of Different Types of GPS Receivers
  • Reference5 Ismail W. (2015). Evaluating the Differences and Accuracies Between GNSS Applications
  • Reference6 Using PPP, Research Project, University of Southern Queensland
  • Reference7 Topcon Tools Software Handbook

Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies

Yıl 2022, Cilt 5, Sayı 1, 68 - 77, 30.06.2022
https://doi.org/10.47137/uujes.1123909

Öz

The accuracy data presented in the technical specifications of the geodetic surveying instruments produced by various companies are controversial. To be able to say anything about the accuracy of these data, they must be obtained under similar conditions, tested by process, adjusting and appropriate statistical methods, and then compared. In this study, Geodetic GNSS receivers produced by different companies were tested according to horizontal accuracies. However, vertical observations were also obtained, only horizontal accuracies were compared.. For this purpose, a horizontal control network was established and long-term static sessions were held with the instruments of each company in this network. The data obtained as a result of the sessions were converted into data files in the same format and adjusted separately by processing with the commercial software of one of the instruments. As a result of adjustment, the results obtained from the instruments of each company were compared according to the horizontal accuracy criteria.

Kaynakça

  • Reference1 Charles D. Ghilani, Paul R. Wolf (2006). Adjustment Computation Spatial Data Analysis
  • Reference2 Zahraa Hussein (2019). GNSS Geodetic Network Design using Least Squares Adjustment Method Paperback
  • Reference3 Pietro Catania et all, (2020). Positioning Accuracy Comparison of GNSS Receivers Used for Mapping and Guidance of Agricultural Machines. Agronomy
  • Reference4 Mariusz Rychlicki et all. (2020). Analysis of Accuracy and Reliability of Different Types of GPS Receivers
  • Reference5 Ismail W. (2015). Evaluating the Differences and Accuracies Between GNSS Applications
  • Reference6 Using PPP, Research Project, University of Southern Queensland
  • Reference7 Topcon Tools Software Handbook

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Mühendislik, Ortak Disiplinler
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Erol YAVUZ> (Sorumlu Yazar)
UŞAK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
0000-0001-6856-2374
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 31 Mayıs 2022
Kabul Tarihi 21 Haziran 2022
Yayınlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022, Cilt 5, Sayı 1

Kaynak Göster

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { uujes1123909, journal = {Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences}, eissn = {2651-3447}, address = {uujes@usak.edu.tr}, publisher = {Uşak Üniversitesi}, year = {2022}, volume = {5}, number = {1}, pages = {68 - 77}, doi = {10.47137/uujes.1123909}, title = {Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies}, key = {cite}, author = {Yavuz, Erol} }
APA Yavuz, E. (2022). Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies . Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences , 5 (1) , 68-77 . DOI: 10.47137/uujes.1123909
MLA Yavuz, E. "Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies" . Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences 5 (2022 ): 68-77 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/uujes/issue/70946/1123909>
Chicago Yavuz, E. "Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies". Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences 5 (2022 ): 68-77
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies AU - ErolYavuz Y1 - 2022 PY - 2022 N1 - doi: 10.47137/uujes.1123909 DO - 10.47137/uujes.1123909 T2 - Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 68 EP - 77 VL - 5 IS - 1 SN - -2651-3447 M3 - doi: 10.47137/uujes.1123909 UR - https://doi.org/10.47137/uujes.1123909 Y2 - 2022 ER -
EndNote %0 Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies %A Erol Yavuz %T Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies %D 2022 %J Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences %P -2651-3447 %V 5 %N 1 %R doi: 10.47137/uujes.1123909 %U 10.47137/uujes.1123909
ISNAD Yavuz, Erol . "Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies". Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences 5 / 1 (Haziran 2022): 68-77 . https://doi.org/10.47137/uujes.1123909
AMA Yavuz E. Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies. UUJES. 2022; 5(1): 68-77.
Vancouver Yavuz E. Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies. Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences. 2022; 5(1): 68-77.
IEEE E. Yavuz , "Comparison of Different Brands of Geodetic GNSS Receivers According to Horizontal Accuracies", Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences, c. 5, sayı. 1, ss. 68-77, Haz. 2022, doi:10.47137/uujes.1123909

An international scientific e-journal published by the University of Usak