IRREGULAR WAVEMAKER (PISTON TYPE) IN A NUMERICAL AND PHYSICAL WAVE TANK

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 95 - 116, 30.12.2022

Bassem Nouioui , Mustafa Doğan

https://doi.org/10.47137/uujes.1180866

Öz

This paper describes the design and execution of a wavemaker system (piston type) in the Dokuz Eylül University Hydraulic Laboratory flume to perform hydraulic model tests using regular and irregular waves. In this study, we will focus on generating the irregular waves from the target JONSWAP spectrum using an adjusted random phase method; also, the control software of the wavemaker is described. An identical numerical channel wave to the physical flume was modeled to compare and observe the irregular wave profile using Flow 3D, one of the advanced computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software. The paddle movement was validated by comparing the experimental converted irregular wave surface elevations to the wave spectrum to the numerical models of several waves.

Anahtar Kelimeler

spectrum, irregular wave, Flow 3d, wave maker

Destekleyen Kurum

TÜBİTAK

Proje Numarası

218M445

Teşekkür

The authors thank the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) for supporting the study by the project 218M445.

Kaynakça

• 1. Daoud B, Kobus JM. Irregular wave generation method with given characteristics in experimental tanks. Ocean Eng. 1995;22(4):387–410.
• 2. Biesel F, Suquet F. Les appareils générateurs de houle en laboratoire. Houille Blanche. 1951;(4):475–96.
• 3. Dean RG, Dalrymple RA. Water wave mechanics for engineers and scientists. 1984.
• 4. Eskinja Z, Miskovic I, Androcec V. Modular Wavemaker Design for Harbours and Ships Physical. BroddGradnja. 2008;59:131–5.
• 5. Eškinja Z, Mišković I, Fabeković Z. Software for wave generator control. MIPRO 2008 - 31st Int Conv Proc Comput Tech Syst Intell Syst. 2008;3(0):65–9.
• 6. Frigaard P, Andersen TL. Technical Background Material for the Wave Generation Software AwaSys 5. DCE Tech reports, No 64. 2010;114.
• 7. Funke E, Mansard E. Laboratory Wave Generation. 1993;333–457.
• 8. Guillouzouic B. Collation of Wave Simulation Methods. Mar Rep. 2014;1–85.
• 9. Khalilabadi MR, Bidokhti AA. Design and Construction of an Optimum Wave Flume M.R. 2012;5(3):99–103.
• 10. Liu Y, Cavalier G, Pastor J, Viera RJ, Guillory C, Judice K, et al. Design and Construction of a Wave Generation System to Model Ocean Conditions in the Gulf of Mexico. Int J Energy Technol. 2012;4(31):1–7.
• 11. Mišković I, Eškinja Z, Horvat K. Wavemaker control system for irregular developed sea waves generation. 2008 Mediterr Conf Control Autom - Conf Proceedings, MED’08. 2008;791–4.
• 12. Schäffer HA. Second-order wavemaker theory for irregular waves. Ocean Eng. 1996 Jan 1;23(1):47–88.
• 13. Schäffer HA, Steenberg CM. Second-order wavemaker theory for multidirectional waves. Ocean Eng. 2003 Jul 1;30(10):1203–31.
• 14. Schmittner C, Scharnke J, Pauw W, Van Den Berg J, Hennig J. New methods and insights in advanced and realistic basin wave modelling. Proc Int Conf Offshore Mech Arct Eng - OMAE. 2013;5(February).
• 15. Spinneken J. Wave Generation and Absorption using Force-feedback Control Imperial College London.
• 16. Wang D xu, Sun J wen, Gui J song, Ma Z, Ning D zhi, Fang K zhao. A numerical piston-type wave-maker toolbox for the open-source library OpenFOAM. J Hydrodyn. 2019;31(4):800–13.
• 17. Y.goda. Random seas and design of maritime structure. 2000.
• 18. Zhang H. A deterministic combination of numerical and physical models for coastal waves [Internet]. Orbit.Dtu.Dk. 2005. Available from: http://orbit.dtu.dk/getResource?recordId=195900&objectId=1&versionId=1.