Research Article

A comparison of Activating Solutions with Hatchery Water in Artificial Insemination of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

Volume: 3 Number: 2 August 31, 2018
EN TR

A comparison of Activating Solutions with Hatchery Water in Artificial Insemination of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

Abstract

In the propagation of rainbow trout, the available water supply used for incubation of fertilized egg is generally used for also spermatozoa being activated to reach eggs. The aim of the present study was to assess comparisons of the effects of two lab-made activating solutions and hatchery water on progressive sperm motility percentage (%), duration of progressive sperm motility (s), and fertilization success in artificial insemination of rainbow trout. For this purpose, an activating solution (A1) containing 60 mM NaHCO3, 50 mM Tris pH=9.0 and another activating solution (A2) containing 20 mM Tris, 30 mM glycine, 125 mM NaCl, pH=9.0, and also  hatchery water (HW) were used for activation of spermatozoa and fertilization. The average motility percentages of samples activated by HW, A1 and A2 were observed >90% with no significant differences, while the durations of progressive motility were found to be significantly different as 22.5±0.7 s, 30.0±1.4 s and 30.5±0.7 s respectively. The lowest average fertilization rate (64.6±1.4 %) was obtained using HW, while those values were 89.4±5.1 and 91.3±0.6 % using A1 and A2 respectively. Consequently, both motility durations and fertilization rates obtained by using A1 and A2 were significantly higher than those values of obtained by HW.

Keywords

References

  1. Abascal, F.J., Cosson, J., Fauvel, C. (2007). Characterization of sperm motility in sea bass: the effect of heavy metals and physicochemical variables on sperm motility. Journal of Fish Biology, 70(2), 509–522.
  2. Alavi, S.M.H., Cosson, J., (2005). Sperm motility in fishes. I. Effects of temperature and pH: a review. Cell Biology International, 29: 101–110.
  3. Alavi, S.M.H., Cosson, J. (2006). Sperm motility in fishes. (II) Effects of ions and osmolality: A review. Cell Biology International, 30: 1–14.
  4. Billard, R. (1977). A new technique of artificial insemination for salmonids using a sperm diluent. Fisheries, 1: 24–25.
  5. Billard, R. (1986). Spermatogenesis and spermatology of some teleost fish species. Reprod Nutr Develop, 26(4): 877–920.
  6. Billard, R. (1988). Artificial insemination and gamete management in fish. Marine Behaviour and Physiology, 14(1): 3–21.
  7. Billard, R. (1992). Reproduction in rainbow trout: sex differentiation, dynamics of gametogenesis, biology and preservation of gametes. Aquaculture, 100: 263–298.
  8. Billard, R., Cosson. J., Perchec, G., Linhart, O. (1995). Biology of sperm and artificial reproduction in carp. Aquaculture, 129: 95–112.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Hydrobiology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

August 31, 2018

Submission Date

February 18, 2018

Acceptance Date

July 30, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 3 Number: 2

APA
İnanan, B. E., Acar, Ü., Urçuk, H., & Çelik, E. (2018). A comparison of Activating Solutions with Hatchery Water in Artificial Insemination of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Journal of Advances in VetBio Science and Techniques, 3(2), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.31797/vetbio.396372
AMA
1.İnanan BE, Acar Ü, Urçuk H, Çelik E. A comparison of Activating Solutions with Hatchery Water in Artificial Insemination of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J Ad VetBio Sci Tech. 2018;3(2):8-15. doi:10.31797/vetbio.396372
Chicago
İnanan, Burak Evren, Ümit Acar, Hüseyin Urçuk, and Ersin Çelik. 2018. “A Comparison of Activating Solutions With Hatchery Water in Artificial Insemination of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss)”. Journal of Advances in VetBio Science and Techniques 3 (2): 8-15. https://doi.org/10.31797/vetbio.396372.
EndNote
İnanan BE, Acar Ü, Urçuk H, Çelik E (August 1, 2018) A comparison of Activating Solutions with Hatchery Water in Artificial Insemination of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Journal of Advances in VetBio Science and Techniques 3 2 8–15.
IEEE
[1]B. E. İnanan, Ü. Acar, H. Urçuk, and E. Çelik, “A comparison of Activating Solutions with Hatchery Water in Artificial Insemination of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)”, J Ad VetBio Sci Tech, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 8–15, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.31797/vetbio.396372.
ISNAD
İnanan, Burak Evren - Acar, Ümit - Urçuk, Hüseyin - Çelik, Ersin. “A Comparison of Activating Solutions With Hatchery Water in Artificial Insemination of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss)”. Journal of Advances in VetBio Science and Techniques 3/2 (August 1, 2018): 8-15. https://doi.org/10.31797/vetbio.396372.
JAMA
1.İnanan BE, Acar Ü, Urçuk H, Çelik E. A comparison of Activating Solutions with Hatchery Water in Artificial Insemination of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J Ad VetBio Sci Tech. 2018;3:8–15.
MLA
İnanan, Burak Evren, et al. “A Comparison of Activating Solutions With Hatchery Water in Artificial Insemination of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss)”. Journal of Advances in VetBio Science and Techniques, vol. 3, no. 2, Aug. 2018, pp. 8-15, doi:10.31797/vetbio.396372.
Vancouver
1.Burak Evren İnanan, Ümit Acar, Hüseyin Urçuk, Ersin Çelik. A comparison of Activating Solutions with Hatchery Water in Artificial Insemination of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J Ad VetBio Sci Tech. 2018 Aug. 1;3(2):8-15. doi:10.31797/vetbio.396372

22563     logo_world_of_journals_no_margin.png     logo.png        google-scholar.jpg?itok=fFLzEt0n