Türkiye tatlısu balık yetiştiriciliğinde alternatif bir tür olarak labeo rohita

Abstract

Türkiye tatlısu balık üretimi Gökkuşağı alabalığı ve aynalı sazan türleri ile kısıtlı kalmıştır. Geçmişi 50-60 yıl öncesine dayanan Türkiye balık yetiştiriciliği sektörünün özellikle içsularda sadece iki türle kısıtlı kalması gelişmesine ve daha ileri gitmesine engel olmuştur. Türkiye’nin 2016 yılı itibarı ile iç sulardan ürettiği balık miktarı 105 bin ton civarındadır. Bunun çok önemli bir kısmını gökkuşağı alabalığı oluşturmaktadır. Hem ülke iç sular potansiyelinin yüksekliği hem de piyasada yeni bir tüketim alternatifine olan gereksinim konu ile ilgili paydaşları alternatif arayışlara yönlendirmektedir. Bu bağlamda yetiştiricilik teknikleri bakımından basit yöntemlerle üretilebilen ülke iklim koşullarına kolay uyum sağlayabilecek, düşük hayvansal protein kaynaklı yemlerle beslenebilecek, kolay yavru üretim olanakları olan bir tür olan Rohu sazanı (Labeo rohita) ülkemiz için iç sularda alternatif bir tür olarak dikkat çekmektedir. Rohu sazanı çok kültürlü sistemlerde kullanılan üç büyük sazan türü arasında en önemlisidir. Bu zarif Indo-Gangetik tür, kuzey ve orta Hindistan'ın nehir sisteminin doğal nüfusu ve Pakistan, Bangladeş ve Myanmar'ın nehirlerinde yaşamaktadır. Türler ayrıca Sri Lanka, eski SSCB, Japonya, Çin, Filipinler, Malezya, Nepal ve Afrika'nın bazı ülkeleri dâhil olmak üzere birçok ülkede tanıtılmıştır. Son yıllarda üretim değerleri 1.6 milyon tonu geçmiştir. Önümüzdeki yıllarda yem fiyatlarının daha da artması ile bu türlere olan ilginin artması beklenmektedir.

Keywords

• Rohu
• Labeo
• Türkiye
• Alternatif tür

Labeo rohita as an alternative to Turkey’s freshwater fish culture

Abstract

Turkey has been restricted to freshwater aquaculture rainbow trout and carp species. Past fifty, sixty years dating back to the fish farming sector in Turkey, especially inland waters not limited only to the development of the two species has been prevented and go further. Turkey is the amount of fish from inland waters to produce about 105 thousand tons by the year 2016. A very important part of this is rainbow trout. The height of both the country's freshwater potential and the need for a new consumption alternative on the market are driving the relevant stakeholders towards alternative pursuits. In this context, Rohu carp (Labeo rohita), which is a species which can be easily produced in terms of cultivation techniques and can adapt easily to the climatic conditions of the country and can feed with foods of low animal protein origin and has easy fry production models, is attracting attention as an alternative species in our country. Rohu carp is the most important of the three major carp species used in polyculture systems. This elegant Indo-Gangetic species lives in the natural population of the river system of northern and central India and in the rivers of Pakistan, Bangladesh and Myanmar. The species have also been introduced in many countries, including Sri Lanka, the former USSR, Japan, China, and the Philippines, Malaysia, Nepal and some African countries. In recent years production
values have exceeded 1.6 million tons. It is expected that the feed prices will increase further in the coming years and the interest in these species will increase

Keywords

• Rohu
• Labeo
• Turkey
• Alternative fish species

References

1. Alikunhi, KH. 1966. Synopsis of biological data on common carp, Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758 (Asia and the Far East).
2. Miah, M.S., . Uddin, M.S., Shah, M.S. 1997. Effect of stocking ratios on the growth and production of fishes in mixed polyculture system Bangladesh J. Fish, 20 (1997), pp. 135-138.Milstein, A. , Wahab, M.A., Rahman, M.M. (2002). The effect of common carp, Cyprinus carpio (L.) and mrigal, Cirrhinus mrigala(Hamilton) as bottom feeders in major Indian carp polycultures Aquac. Res., 33, pp. 547-556Nandeesha, M. C., De Silva, S. S., Murthy, D. K., & Dathatri, K. (1994). Use of mixed feeding schedules in fish culture: field trials on catla, Catla catla (Hamilton‐Buchanan), rohu, Labeo rohita (Hamilton), and common carp, Cyprinus carpio L. Aquaculture Research, 25(6), 659-670.Rahman, M. M., Verdegem, M. C. J., Nagelkerke, L. A. J., Wahab, M. A., Milstein, A., & Verreth, J. A. J. (2006). Growth, production and food preference of rohu Labeo rohita (H.) in monoculture and in polyculture with common carp Cyprinus carpio (L.) under fed and non-fed ponds. Aquaculture, 257(1-4), 359-372.Sahu, T. S. P. (2006). Use of freshwater aquatic plants as a substitute of fishmeal in the diet of Labeo rohita fry. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 1(2), 126-135.Sharma, J., & Chakrabarti, R. (2003). Role of stocking density on growth and survival of catla, Catla catla, and rohu, Labeo rohita, larvae and water quality in a recirculating system. Journal of applied aquaculture, 14(1-2), 171-178.Talwar, P.K. & Jhingran, A.G. 1991. Inland Fishes of India and Adjacent Countries. Volume 1. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India. 541 pp.Varghese, T. J. (1973). The fecundity of the rohu, Labeo rohita (Hamilton). In Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences-Section B (Vol. 77, No. 5, pp. 214-224). Springer India.
3. FAO Fisheries Synopsis, 31(1):83 Balon, E. K. 1995a. The common carp, Cyprinus carpio: its wild origin, domestication in aquaculture, and selection as colored nishikigoi. Guelph Ichthyological Reviews, 3:8-55
4. Biswas, G., Jena, J. K., Singh, S. K., Patmajhi, P., & Muduli, H. K. (2006). Effect of feeding frequency on growth, survival and feed utilization in mrigal, Cirrhinus mrigala, and rohu, Labeo rohita, during nursery rearing. Aquaculture, 254(1-4), 211-218.
5. FAO 2006. Cultured Aquatic Species Information Programme. Labeo rohita. Cultured Aquatic Species Information Programme. Text by Jena, J.K. In: FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department [online]. Rome. Updated 21 February 2006. [Cited 5 October 2018].
6. FAO 2015. Aquaculture topics activities. Aquaculture resources.In: FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Departments. Rome. Updated 29 December 2015.
7. Hora, S.L. and Pillay, T.V.R. 1962. Handbook on Fish Culture in the Indo-Pacific Region. FAa Fisheries Biological Technical Paper, 14: 204
8. Jafri, A. K. (1998). Growth rate, feed conversion, and body composition of Catla catla, Labeo rohita, and Cirrhinus mrigala fry fed diets of various carbohydrate‐to‐lipid ratios. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 29(1), 84-91.

9. Kirpitchnikov, V.S. (l999). Genetics and Breeding of Common Carp. INRA, Paris, pp. 97.
10. Lintermans, M. 2007. Fishes of the Murray-Darling Basin: an introductory guide. Murray29 Darling Basin Commission, Canberra, pp 166.
11. Miah, M.S., M. Shab Uddin, M.S. Shah 1993.Effects of artificial feed in carps polyculture system Bangladesh J. Agric. Sci., 20 , pp. 359-36