Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2023, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 69 - 76, 20.12.2023

Abstract

References

  • Barnes, J. (2011). The Sense of an Ending, New York: Knopf.
  • Kermode, F. (2000). “The Sense of an Ending.” Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • López-Deflory, E. (2016). Beginnings, Middles, and Ends: A Kermodian Reading of Julian Barnes’s Nothing to be Frightened of and The Sense of an Ending. English: Journal of the English Association, Volume 65, Issue 249, Summer 2016, 158–173, https://doi.org/10.1093/english/efw014
  • Michael G., (2014) “The Oddness of Julian Barnes and The Sense of An Ending.” English: Journal of the English Association, Volume 63, Issue 242, 1 September 2014, 225–240, https://doi.org/10.1093/english/efu016
  • Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, History, Forgetting. (trans.) Kathleen McLaughlin& David Pellauer. Chicago & London: The University of ChicagoPress.
  • Shapiro, A.L. (1997). “Whose (Which) History is it Anyway?” History and Theory, Vol. 36, No. 4, Theme Issue 36: Producing the Past: Making Histories Inside and Outside the Academy. December.

History and Memory in The Sense of An Ending by Julian Barnes

Year 2023, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 69 - 76, 20.12.2023

Abstract

This study aims to examine The Sense of an Ending in terms of history and memory. Anthony Webster’s and his friends’ past and and the life of Anthony, or Tony as his friends call him, and the lives of all other characters are told from Tony's perspective, so the reader has to depend on his memory to reach a conclusion. But his ideas and memories show no stability, and every clue about the past changes or refutes his previous view, and sometimes everything becomes blurry. In La Grange's words, the absence of documents leaves a gap in memory and causes some facts that are not at all certain to appear as if they were real. Tony recalls his memories and tells the events exactly as if they were real, but with each new document that emerges - Tony's letter, Adrian’s diary - everything changes and requires a new perspective. The story may need to be rewritten from Adrian's or Veronica Ford's point of view, but ultimately it is true that each character's narratives will fill the gaps differently, because memory is subjective; hence it is unreliable.

References

  • Barnes, J. (2011). The Sense of an Ending, New York: Knopf.
  • Kermode, F. (2000). “The Sense of an Ending.” Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • López-Deflory, E. (2016). Beginnings, Middles, and Ends: A Kermodian Reading of Julian Barnes’s Nothing to be Frightened of and The Sense of an Ending. English: Journal of the English Association, Volume 65, Issue 249, Summer 2016, 158–173, https://doi.org/10.1093/english/efw014
  • Michael G., (2014) “The Oddness of Julian Barnes and The Sense of An Ending.” English: Journal of the English Association, Volume 63, Issue 242, 1 September 2014, 225–240, https://doi.org/10.1093/english/efu016
  • Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, History, Forgetting. (trans.) Kathleen McLaughlin& David Pellauer. Chicago & London: The University of ChicagoPress.
  • Shapiro, A.L. (1997). “Whose (Which) History is it Anyway?” History and Theory, Vol. 36, No. 4, Theme Issue 36: Producing the Past: Making Histories Inside and Outside the Academy. December.
There are 6 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects British and Irish Language, Literature and Culture
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Münevver Bartamay 0000-0001-8656-7830

Publication Date December 20, 2023
Submission Date December 6, 2023
Acceptance Date December 19, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 1 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Bartamay, M. (2023). History and Memory in The Sense of An Ending by Julian Barnes. Academic Journal of Philology, 1(1), 69-76.