Using Biplot Analysis Technique to Selection in Tritikale Breeding Studies

Abstract

This study was carried out in Diyarbakır conditions with 20 advanced triticale lines and 5 standard varieties in 2012-2013 and 2013-14 growing seasons. According to variance analysis results, the interaction of year, genotype and year*genotype was found to be significant (p<0.01; p<0.05) in terms of many characteristics. the results showing that plant height was changed 3 237-5 389 kg/ha-1, hectoliter weight is 71.2-78.8 kg/hl-1, thousand grain weight is 28.0-40.2 g, protein content 14.6%-17.2%, the moisture rate in the grain varied between 7.9-8.1%. In terms of traits, many lines used in the research were superior to the varieties used as standard in the experiment. In addition, superior genotypes were determined by considering all characters together with GT biplot technique. In GT biplot technique, PC1 made up 36.83% of the variation, PC2 constituted 19.53% of the variation and 56.36% of the variation in total. According to the results of the research, depending on the ecological factors of the growing seasons, the plants were earlier spiked and reached higher height in the first year; It was determined that grain yield, thousand grain weight and hectoliter weight were higher than the second year, and on the contrary, the protein content was lower than the second year due to high precipitation. It was concluded that biplot analysis techniques facilitate the work of breeders in selection. It has been concluded that the results of a single growing season will be insufficient and the results of two growing seasons may be sufficient to evaluate the cultivar candidates.

Keywords

• Adaptation
• Bi-plot
• Diyarbakir
• Genotype

Tritikale Islah Çalışmalarında Biplot Analiz Tekniğinin Seleksiyonda Kullanılması

Öz

References

1. Bağcı S A ve Ekiz H (1993). Tritikalenin insan ve hayvan beslenmesindeki yeri. Konya’da hububat tarımının sorunları ve çözüm yolları sempozyumu, Bildiri Özetleri,12-14 Mayıs 1993. Konya.
2. Bocianowski, J., Tratwal, A., & Nowosad, K. (2021). Genotype by environment interaction for main winter triticale varieties characteristics at two levels of technology using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model. Euphytica, 217(2), 1-30.
3. Boru, K. 2020. Bazı ileri kademe tritikale hatalarının Bursa ekolojik koşullarında verim ve kalite yönünde araştırılması (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi).
4. Butnaru, G., Sarac, I., & Ciulca, S. (2014). Relationship among yield and plant specific traits on triticale Romanian varieties in Timisoara environment. Communications in agricultural and applied biological sciences, 79(4), 201-210.
5. Dolgun, C., & Çifci, E. A. (2019). Bursa ekolojik koşullarında yetiştirilen bazı tritikale çeşitlerinin verim ve kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 22(5), 664-670.
6. Goyal, A., Beres, B. L., Randhawa, H. S., Navabi, A., Salmon, D. F., & Eudes, F. (2011). Yield stability analysis of broadly adaptive triticale germplasm in southern and central Alberta, Canada, for industrial end-use suitability. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 91(1), 125-135.
7. Kaplan, M., Kökten, K., Akçura, M., Bakoğlu, A., & Kavurmacı, Z. (2011). Bazı triticale çeşit ve hatlarının ot verimleri ve ot kaliteleri üzerine araştırma. IX. Türkiye Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi,Cilt 3:191-196, 12-15/09/2011, Bursa.
8. Kendal, E. 2021. Comparison of the spring Triticale candidate with common varieties. 3rd Internatıonal Halıch Congress on Multıdıscıplınary Scıentıfıc Research, Conference Proceedıngs Book, P:585-597, August 15­16, 2021.

9. Kendal, E., & Sayar, M. S. 2016. The stability of some spring triticale genotypes using biplot analysis. J. Anim. Plant Sci, 26(3), 754-765.
10. Kendal, E., Sayar, M. S., Tekdal, S., Aktas, H., & Karaman, M. 2016. Assessment of the impact of ecological factors on yield and quality parameters in triticale using GGE biplot and AMMI analysis. Pakistan Journal Botany, 48(5), 1903-1913.
11. Kendal, E., Tekdal, S., & Karaman, M. 2019. Proficiency of biplot methods (AMMI and GGE) in the appraisal of triticale genotypes in multiple environments. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(3), 5995-6007.
12. Kendal, E., Tekdal, S., Aktaş, H., Karaman, M., Ahmet A. 2012. Güneydoğu Anadolu yağışa dayalı şartlarında yazlık Tritikale hatlarının tarımsal özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi, 1(1)39-46.
13. Kızılgeçi, F., Akıncı, C., Albayrak, Ö., Yıldırım, M. 2017.Tritikale hatlarında bazı fizyolojik parametrelerin verim ve kalite özellikleriyle ilişkilerinin belirlenmesi. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(1): 337-345.
14. Kizilgeçi, F. (2019). Assessment of yield and quality of some Triticale genotypes in South-Eastern Anatolia. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 9(1), 545-551.
15. Kizilgeçi, F., & YILDIRIM, M. (2017). Bazı tritikale (X Triticosecale Wittmack) genotiplerinin verim ve kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(1), 43-49.
16. Liu, J., Song, Q., Tian, X., & Liu, H. (2018). Evaluation of the adaptability of triticale genotypes using membership function and GGE-biplot analysis. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 27(5), 85-96.
17. Mergoum M, Ryan J, Shroyer J P, Monem, M A (1992). Potential for adapting triticale in Morocco. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 21(2): 137-141.
18. Muntzing A (1989). Triticale results and problems. Advances in plant breeding. Supplement to Journal of Plant Breeding. Verlag Paul Parey. Berlin and Hamburg. 103 p.
19. Oral, E., Ülker, M., Altuner, F., & Özdemir, B. (2020). Van ekolojik koşullarında tritikale (x Triticosecale witmack) çeşitlerinde anıza ve normal ekimin verim ve verim unsurları Üzerine Etkisinin Araştırılması. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4(4), 756-774.
20. Ponomarev, S. N., Ponomareva, M. L., & Tagirov, M. S. (2018). Evaluation of phenotypic stability of winter triticale varieties by grain yield by biplot analysis. Crop Husbandry, P:34-38.
21. Sirat, A., Bahar, B., & Bahar, N. 2020. Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi karasal iklim ve kuru tarım koşullarında Tritikale (x Triticosecale Wittmack) çeşitlerinin tane verimi ve verim unsurları üzerinde bir araştırma. Bahri Dağdaş Bitkisel Araştırma Dergisi, 9(2), 134-146.
22. Stoyanov, H. (2021). Environment adjusted yield model for ranking and stability assessment of winter triticale (X Triticosecale Wittm.) Genotypes. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research 2021, Vol. 5 (1), 141-157.
23. Yan, W., & Rajcan, I. (2002). Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop science, 42(1), 11-20.
24. Yan, W., & Tinker, N. A. (2005). An integrated biplot analysis system for displaying, interpreting, and exploring genotype× environment interaction. Crop Science, 45(3), 1004-1016.
25. Yan, W., Hunt, L. A., Sheng, Q., & Szlavnics, Z. (2000). Cultivar evaluation and mega‐environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop science, 40(3), 597-605.