Research Article

Different Efficient Responses of Sorghum and Maize Varieties to Different Irrigation Systems

Volume: 33 Number: 4 December 31, 2023
EN

Different Efficient Responses of Sorghum and Maize Varieties to Different Irrigation Systems

Abstract

Drought is one of the most common abiotic stressors in the agricultural community. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of drought on sorghum and maize seedlings. The experiment was conducted as a randomized complete block design (RCBD) in a split plot arrangement with three replicates over two years in Isfahan, Iran. Investigational treatments include three-tier drought stress for two varieties of each plant species. The results demonstrate that the highest energy productivity of fresh forage was obtained in the Pegah variety of sorghum (1.49 kg Mj-1) and the lowest was obtained in the Maxima variety of maize (0.52 kg Mj-1).With 60% irrigation, the lowest water productivity of fresh and dry fodder in maize was found in the Maxima variety (8.32 kg m-3) and the 704 variety (2.15 kg m-3). However, sorghum in the Pegah cultivar at 60% irrigation had the highest water productivity when it came to wet and dry fodder, with an average of 25.45 kg m-3 and 7.57 kg m-3, respectively. These results clearly show that in the aspect of energy consumption and production, sorghum was able to optimally convert the consumed energy into more fodder. On the other hand, the Pegah variety in sorghum, having the highest energy efficiency of dry fodder regardless of the amount of water used, was a more suitable plant to choose for planting in areas with water shortage.

Keywords

References

  1. Abadia, R., Rocamora, C., Ruiz, A., & Puerto, H. (2008). Energy efficiency in irrigation distribution networks I: theory. Biosystems Engineering, 101(1), 21-27.
  2. Abbas, M., Abdel-Lattif, H., & Shahba, M. (2021). Ameliorative effects of calcium sprays on yield and grain nutritional composition of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars under drought stress. Agriculture, 11(4), 285.
  3. Admasu, R., Michael, A. W., & Hordofa, T. (2019). Effect of moisture stress on maize (Zea Mays L.) yield and water productivity. Int J Environ Sci Nat Res, 16(4), 555945.
  4. Allahdadi, M., & Bahreininejad, B. (2019). Effects of water stress on growth parameters and forage quality of globe artichoke (Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus L.). Iran Agricultural Research, 38(2), 101-110.
  5. Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Fao, Rome, 300(9), D05109.
  6. AOAC. (1995). Official methods of analysis. Animal Feed. Chapter, 16th edition. AOAC International Arlington VI, USA. 30 pp.
  7. Bazaluket, O., Havrysh, V., Fedorchuk, M., & Nitsenko, V. (2021). Energy assessment of sorghum cultivation in Southern Ukraine. Agriculture, 11(8), 695.
  8. Bekele, S., & Tilahun, K. (2007). Regulated deficit irrigation scheduling of onion in a semiarid region of Ethiopia. Agricultural Water Management, 89(1-2), 148-152.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Irrigation Systems

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

December 15, 2023

Publication Date

December 31, 2023

Submission Date

June 27, 2023

Acceptance Date

September 3, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 33 Number: 4

APA
Torabi, M., Heidarisoltanabadi, M., Daneshvar Rad, R., Heidari Sharifabad, H., Azizinezhad, R., & Salemi, H. (2023). Different Efficient Responses of Sorghum and Maize Varieties to Different Irrigation Systems. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 33(4), 605-617. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1319741
Creative Commons License
Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Agricultural Sciences by Van Yuzuncu Yil University Faculty of Agriculture is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.