Determination of the Relationships between Crude Protein Content and Other Forage Quality Parameters in Grazed and Nongrazed Pastures by Correlation and Path Analysis

Volume: 25 Number: 2 May 30, 2015
EN TR

Determination of the Relationships between Crude Protein Content and Other Forage Quality Parameters in Grazed and Nongrazed Pastures by Correlation and Path Analysis

Abstract

This research was conducted to determine characters effecting crude protein content in different artificial pastures from the years 2010 to 2012 by using simple correlation coefficient and path analysis. Forage samples were collected from grazing and non-grazing areas once every 15 days during the grazing seasons. The crude protein (CP), acid detergent fibre (ADF), neutral detergent fibre (NDF) contents, in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and crude ash ratios were determined on the forage samples. The results showed that there were significant interrelationships between quality parameters and the crude protein content in grazing and non-grazing areas of pastures. Several traits affected the crude protein directly or indirectly. In nongrazed areas, P, K and Mg showed positive direct effect on crude protein whereas there were negative direct effects of NDF, ADF, IVDMD, Ca and ash on crude protein content. In grazed areas, ADF, IVDMD, P and K showed positive direct effect on crude protein whereas there were negative direct effects of NDF, Ca, Mg and ash on crude protein content.

Keywords

References

  1. Araujo MRA, Coulman BE (2002) Genetic variation, heritability and progeny testing in meadow bromegrass. Plant Breeding, v.121 417-424.
  2. Araujo MRA, Coulman B (2004) Genetic variation and correlation of agronomic traits in meadow bromegrass (Bromus riparius Rehm) clones. Ciencia Rural, Santa Maria, 34 (2): 505-510.
  3. Arzani H, ZohdiM, Fish E, Zahedi Amiri GH, Nikkhah A, Wester D (2004) Phenological effects on forage quality of five grass species. J Range Manage 57:624 –629.
  4. Board, JE, Kang MS, Harville BG (1997) Path analyses identify indirect selection criteria for yield of late planted soybean. Crop Sci. 37 :879-884.
  5. Buxton RD, Mertens DR, Fisher DS (1996) Forage quality and ruminant utilization. In: Cool-Season Forage Grasses (Eds Moser, LE, Buxton DR, Casler MD), American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America & Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 229–267.
  6. Dofing SM, Knight CW (1992). Alternative model for path analysis of small-grain yield, Crop Sci., 32:487-489.
  7. Finne MA, Rognli OA, Schjelderup I (2000) Genetic variation in a Norwegian germplasm collection of white clover (Trifolium repens L.):3.Correlation and path coefficient analyses of agronomic characters. Euphytica 112: 57-68.
  8. Holechek JL, Preper RD, Herbel CH (2004). Range Management: Principles and Practices, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1–607.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Sebahattin Albayrak This is me

Yalçın Bozkurt This is me

Publication Date

May 30, 2015

Submission Date

March 10, 2015

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2015 Volume: 25 Number: 2

APA
Türk, M., Albayrak, S., & Bozkurt, Y. (2015). Determination of the Relationships between Crude Protein Content and Other Forage Quality Parameters in Grazed and Nongrazed Pastures by Correlation and Path Analysis. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 25(2), 207-213. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.236392
Creative Commons License
Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Agricultural Sciences by Van Yuzuncu Yil University Faculty of Agriculture is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.