Farklı PGPR Formülasyonları, Kimyasal Gübre ve Kombinasyonlarının Atatürk Çiçeğinin Bazı Gelişim Parametreleri Üzerine Etkileri

Yıl 2019, , 9 - 15, 31.05.2019

Fazilet Parlakova Karagöz , Atilla Dursun

https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.466037

Cited By: 3

Öz

Bu çalışma, farklı PGPR formülasyonları, kimyasal gübre ve kombinasyonlarının Atatürk Çiçeği’nin bazı gelişim parametreleri üzerine etkilerini belirlemek amacıyla Temmuz 2015-Temmuz 2016 tarihleri arasında iklim kontrollü araştırma serasında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Atatürk Çiçeği (Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd. ex Klotzsch cv. Christmas Feelings) köklü çelikleri bitki materyali olarak kullanılmıştır. Formülasyon 1, formülasyon 2, formülasyon 3, formülasyon 4, yaygın olarak kullanılan kimyasal gübre miktarının tamamı (%100 KG) ve her bir formülasyon ile kimyasal gübrenin %50 azaltılmış miktarının kombinasyonları ve kontrol olarak uygulamalar oluşturulmuştur. Denemede bitki boyu, ana gövde çapı, kök sayısı, kök uzunluğu ve çapı, bitkinin taze ve kuru ağırlığı değerlendirilmiştir. KG ve kontrol uygulamalarına göre, BIV+KG uygulaması brakte yaprak sayısını % 14,76 ile % 29,32 arasında arttırmıştır ve ayrıca bitki boyunu da %2,87 ile % 5,27 arasında arttırmıştır.  En yüksek bitki yaş ağırlığı (16,93 g) BII ve KG uygulamalarından elde edilmiştir. En yüksek ortalama bitki yaş (4,69 g) ve kuru ağırlığı (1,57 g) BII uygulamasında belirlenmiştir. Atatürk Çiçeğinin bazı bitki gelişimi ve kalite özellikleri üzerinde olumlu etkileri olan BIV+KG, BIII+ KG, BIV ve BII bakteri formülasyonlarının Atatürk Çiçeği yetiştirme aşamasında kullanılabileceği belirlenmiştir. Böylece, bakteriyel formülasyonlar Atatürk Çiçeği yetiştiriciliğinde kimyasal gübre kullanımının azaltılmasına yol açabilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Brakte, Atatürk Çiçeği, Saksılı süs bitkisi, Rizobakteri formulasyonu

Effects of Different PGPR Formulations, Chemical Fertilizers and Their Combinations on Some Plant Growth Characteristics of Poinsettia

Öz

This
study was carried out to determine effects of different PGPR formulations,
chemical fertilizers and their combinations on some plant growth
characteristics of poinsettia under climate-controlled research greenhouse
between July 2015 and July 2017. In the study, rooted cuttings of poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd. ex Klotzsch
cv. Christmas Feelings) were used as plant material. The applications were
created as formulation 1, formulation 2, formulation 3, formulation 4, the full
amount of commonly used chemical fertilizer (100% CF), by combining the reduced
amount of chemical fertilizer by 50% with each bacterial formulation and
control. Plant height, main stem diameter, number of bract, length and diameter
of root, fresh and dry weight of plant were evaluated in the experiment.
According to CF and control applications, BIV+CF application was increased in
the number of bract leaves between 14.76% and 29.32%; and it was also increased
in plant height between 2.87% and 5.27%, respectively. The highest plant fresh
weight (16.93 g) was obtained from BII and CF applications. The highest average
fresh (4.69 g) and dry (1.57 g) plant weight were determined in BII
application. It has been determined that bacterial formulations BIV+CF,
BIII+CF, BIV and BII, which have positive effects on some plant growth and
quality characteristics of poinsettia, can be used in poinsettia production
stage. Thus, bacterial formulations may allow reducing the using chemical
fertilizer in its cultivation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bract, Poinsettia, Potted ornamental plant, Rhizobacteria formulation

Kaynakça

• Anonymous (2013). Horticulture. Euphorbia Growing. Ministry of National Education vocational and technical education school / institution module. Ankara, 2013.
• Anonymous (2018). Ecke Poinsettias. https://www.dummenorange.com/flippingbooks/DummenOrange-Ecke-Poinsettia-2018/assets/common/downloads/publication.pdf (Access date: 28.09.2018).
• Arab A, Zamani GR, Sayyari MH, Asili J (2015). Effects of chemical and biological fertilizers on morpho-physiological traits of marigold (Calendula officinalis L.). European Journal of Medicinal Plants 8 (1): 60-68.
• Asghar HN, Zahir ZA, Arshad M (2004). Screening rhizobacteria for improving the growth, yield, and oil content of canola (Brassica napus L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55(2): 187-194.
• Ashrafuzzaman M, Hossen FA, Ismail MR, Hoque A, Islam MZ, Shahidullah SM, Meon S (2009). Efficiency of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) for the enhancement of rice growth. African Journal of Biotechnology 8(7): 1247-1252.
• Baset M, Shamsuddin ZH, Wahab Z, Marziah M (2010). Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacterial (PGPR) inoculation on growth and nitrogen incorporation of tissue-cultured'musa'plantlets under nitrogen-free hydroponics condition. Australian Journal of Crop Science 4(2): 85.
• Bennett MD, Price HJ Johnston JS (2008). Anthocyanin inhibits propidium iodide DNA fluorescence in Euphorbia pulcherrima: implications for genome size variation and flow cytometry. Annals of Botany 101(6): 777–790.
• Cantin B (2016). Produce the best poinsettias. https://www.berger.ca/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/09/E-Book_ProducePoinsettia_en.pdf (Access date: 28.09.2018).
• De Silva A, Patterson K, Rothrock C, Moore J (2000). Growth promotion of highbush blueberry by fungal and bacterial inoculants. Hortscıence 35(7): 1228-1230.
• Díaz VP (1998). Biofertilización del cultivo de lechuga (Lactuca sativa L.) con bacterias promotoras del crecimiento, micorriza arbuscular y vermicomposta. Tesis de maestría en ciencias. Colegio de Posgraduados en Ciencias Agrícolas. Especialidad de edafología. Montecillo, mex. 119p.
• Faust JE, Korczynski PC, Klein R (2001). Effects of paclobutrazol drench application date on poinsettia height and flowering. HortTechnology- October–December 11(4): 557-560.
• Ge B, Liu B, Nwet TT, Zhao W, Shi L, Zhang K (2016). Bacillus methylotrophicus strain NKG-1, isolated from Changbai Mountain, China, has potential applications as a biofertilizer or biocontrol agent. PloS one 11(11): e0166079.
• Gholami A, Shahsavani S, Nezarat S (2009). The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on germination, seedling growth and yield of maize. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 49: 19-24.
• Jaleel CA, Manivannan P, Sankar B, Kishorekumar A, Gopi R, Somasundaram R, Panneerselvam R (2007). Pseudomonas fluorescens enhances biomass yield and ajmalicine production in Catharanthus roseus under water deficit stress. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 60(1): 7-11.
• Karishma Yadav K, Tanwar A, Aggarwal A (2013). Impact of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Pseudomonas fluorescens with various levels of superphosphate on growth enhancement and flowering response of gerbera journal of ornamental plants. Journal of Ornamental and Horticultural Plants 3 (3): 161-170, September.
• Kofranek AM, Byrne TG, Sciaroni RH, Lunt OR (1963). Slow release fertilizers for poinsettia pot plants. California Agriculture 17(9): 14-15.
• Kokalis–Burelle N, Vavrina CS, Rosskopf EN, Shelby RA (2002). Field evaluation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria amended transplant mixes and soil solarization for tomato and pepper production in Florida. Plant and Soil 238(2): 257-266.
• Kotan R, Çakmakçı R, Şahin F, Karagöz K, Dadaşoğlu F, Kantar F (2010). Türkiye’de bakteriyel biyoajanlar kullanılarak hastalık ve zararlıların kontrolüne yönelik yapılan biyolojik mücadele çalışmaları. Türkiye IV. Organik Tarım Sempozyumu, 28 Haziran-1 Temmuz 2010, Erzurum. 726-738.
• Kotan R, Kant C, Karagöz K, Dadaşoğlu F, Çakmakçı R, Fayetörbay D, Şahin F, Çomaklı B (2009). Bazı bakteri inokülasyonlarının kontrollü şartlar altında yonca bitkisinin (Medicago sativa L.) büyümesi ve kimyasal kompozisyonu üzerine etkisi. 16. Ulusal Biyoteknoloji Kongresi, 13-16 Aralık 2009. Antalya. S: 14.
• Larson RA, Love JW, Strider DL (1978). Commercial poinsettia production. N. C. Agr. Ext. Ser. Ag-108.
• Lawrence WJC, Price JR, Robınson GM, Robınson R (1941). The distribution of anthocyanins in flowers, fruits and leaves. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 230(567): 149-178.
• Martinetti L, Sparacino A, Ferrante A, Allievi L (2007). Effect of a biofertiliser on the growth of poinsettia. In International Symposium on High Technology for Greenhouse System Management: Greensys2007 801: 1177-1182.
• Mayfıeld MH (1997). A systematic treatment of Euphorbia subgenus Poinsettia (Euphobiaceae). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA.
• Nandakumar R, Babu S, Viswanathan R, Sheela J, Raguchander T, Samiyappan R (2001). A new bio-formulation containing plant growth promoting rhizobacterial mixture for the management of sheath blight and enhanced grain yield in rice. Biocontrol 46(4): 493-510.
• Padmadevi K, Jawaharlal M, Vijayakumar M (2004). Effect of biofertilizers on floral characters and vase life of anthurium (Anthurium andreanum Lind.) cv. Temptation. South Indian Horticulture 52 (1–6): 228–231.
• Parlakova F (2014). Effects of nitrogen fixing and phosphate solubilizing bacteria on plant development, number of bulb, quality of bulb and mineral contents of tulip culvitars. Atatürk University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ms Thesis, 113 p., Erzurum.
• Selvaraj T, Rajeshkumar S, Nisha MC, Wondimu L, Tesso M (2008). Effect of Glomus mosseae and plant growth promoting rhizomicroorganisms (PGPR's) on growth, nutrients and content of secondary metabolites in Begonia malabarica Lam. Mj. Int. J. Sci. Tech. 2(03):516-525.
• Shaharoona B, Arshad M, Zahir ZA, Khalid A (2006). Performance of Pseudomonas spp. containing ACC-deaminase for improving growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in the presence of nitrogenous fertilizer. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38(9):2971-2975.
• Siemonsma R ( 2007). Common poinsettia problems. Greenhouse grower. July 2007. 8 ©2009. All rights reserved. GANTEC Inc.
• Solano BR, De La Iglesia MP, Probanza A, García JL, Megías M, Manero FG (2007). Screening for PGPR to improve growth of Cistus ladanifer seedlings for reforestation of degraded mediterranean ecosystems. In First International Meeting on Microbial Phosphate Solubilization (pp. 59-68). Springer, Dordrecht.
• Steinmann VW, Porter JM (2002). Phylogenetic relationships in Euphorbieae (Euphorbiaceae) based on ITS and ndhF sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 89: 453 – 490.
• Thapa, S. (2017). Production of poinsettia (Euphorbia Pulcherrima) with light emitting diodes compared with the traditional high pressure sodium lamp (Master's thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås). 66p.
• Van Peer R, Niemann GJ, Schippers B (1991). Induced resistance and phytoalexin accumulation in biological control of Fusarium wilt of carnation by Pseudomonas sp. strainWCS417r. Phytopathology 81 (7): 728–734.
• Zulueta-Rodriguez R, Cordoba-Matson MV, Hernandez-Montiel LG, Murillo-Amador B, Rueda-Puente E, Lara L (2014). Effect of Pseudomonas putida on growth and anthocyanin pigment in two poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima) cultivars. The Scientific World Journal Volume 2014, Article ID 810192, 6 pages.