Kent Biyoçeşitliliği ve Kültürel Değişim Açısından Dış Mekan Süs Bitkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Niğde Kenti Örneği

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 4, 825 - 837, 31.12.2021

Gülden Sandal Erzurumlu Dursun Yenal Erzurumlu

https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.860641

Öz

Kırsal alanlarda kullanılan bitki türleri, kültürel değişim ve biyoçeşitliliğin belirlenmesinde önemli rol oynamaktadır. Geçmiş dönemlerde, insanlar çiçekli bitkilere önem vermiş ve bahçelerini güzelleştirmek için birçok bitki türleri kullanmışlardır. Biyoçeşitlilik, geleneksel olarak tercih edilmiş olan çiçekli bitki türlerinin dağılımı kullanılarak belirlenebilir. Bu çalışmada, yerleşim alanlarında kullanılan bitkiler incelendiğinde, 200 örnek alanda 39 familyaya ait 132 bitki türü belirlenmiştir. Çalışmada, beş faklı yerleşim alanı değerlendirilmiştir. Bunlar; Müstakil evler, Geleneksel evler, villa evler, site ve toplu konut olarak sıralanabilir. Araştırma alanında doğal olmayan türlerin yoğun olarak kullanıldığı tespit edilmiştir. Geleneksel evlerde öncelikli olarak meyve veren ve doğal türlerin kullanıldığı gözlemlenmiştir. Diğer ev tiplerinde doğal olmayan türlerin kullanıldığı tespit edilmiştir. Doğal bitki türlerin sürekliliği ve korunması için geleneksel evlerin bahçe düzeni daha değerli bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Peyzaj, Bitki türleri, Biyoçeşitlilik, Kent bitkileri, Ev bahçeleri

Evaluation of Outdoor Ornamental Plants from the Viewpoint of Urban Biodiversity and Cultural Change in Terrestrial Climate: The Case of Nigde City

Öz

Plant species used in urban settlements play an important role in cultural change and biodiversity determination. In the past, people have used many plant species to beautify their gardens by giving importance to flowering plants. Biodiversity can be determined by using the distribution of flowering plant species that have traditionally been preferred as species and in urban settlements. In this study, when the plants used in the settlement areas were investigated, 132 plant species belonging to 39 families were identified in a total of 200 sample areas. Five different residential areas were evaluated in the study. These can be listed as detached houses, traditional houses, villa houses, site, mass housing. It has been determined that non-natural species are used extensively in the research areas. It is observed that plant species natural plants and containing fruit are given priority in traditional gardens. It has been determined that unnatural species are used in other house types. For the continuity and protection of natural plant species, the garden order of traditional houses has been found more valuable.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Biodiversity, Home gardens, Landscape, Plant species, Urban Plants

Kaynakça

• Acar, C., Acar, H., Eroğlu, E. (2007). Evaluation of Ornamental Plant Resources to Urban Biodiversity and Cultural Changing: A Case Study of Residatial Landscapes in Trabzon City (Turkey), Building and Enviroment, 42 (2007), 218-229.
• Agelet, A., Angels, BM., Valles, J. (2000). Homegardens and their role as a main source of medicinal plants in mountain regions of Catalonia (Iberian peninsula). Econ Bot 54:295–309.
• Agnoletti, M. (2014). Rural landscape, nature conservation and culture: Some notes on research trends and management approaches from a (southern) European perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning 126 (2014) 66–73.
• Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70, 21–34.
• Barbhuiya, A.R., Saho,o UK., Upadhyaya, K. (2016). Plant Diversity in the Indigenous Home Gardens in the Eastern Himalayan Region of Mizoram, Northeast India. Economic Botany, 70(2), pp. 115–131. Cornelis, J., Hermy, M. (2004). Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004; 69(4):385–401.
• Cruz Garcia, G.S., Struik, P.C. (2015) Spatial and seasonal diversity of wild food plants in home gardens of Northeast Thailand. Economic Botany, 69(2), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-015-9309-8
• Davis, P.H., Mıll, R.R., Tan, K. (1988) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (Supplement). Vol.10.
• Davoren. E., Siebert, S., Cilliers, S.S., du Toit, M. (2016). Influence of socioeconomic status on de¬sign of Botswana home gardens and associated plant diversity patterns in northern South Africa. Landscape and Ecological Engineering 12: 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11355-015-0279-x
• Galhena, D.H., Freed, R., Maredia, K.M. (2013) Home gardens: a promising approach to enhance household food security and wellbeing. Agric Food Secur 2:48–62
• Idohoua, R.B., Fandohanabc, V.K, Salakoa, B., Kassaa, R.C, Gbedomona, H., Yedomonhana, R., Kabir, M.E, Webb, E.L. (2009). Household and home garden characteristics in southwestern Bangladesh. Agroforestry System 75:129–145.
• Kendal, D., Williams, K.J.H., Williams, N.S.G. (2012). Plant traits link people’s plant preferences to the composition of their gardens. Landscape and Urban Planning 105: 34–42. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.023
• Kumar, B.M, Nair, P.K.R (2004). The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agroforestry Systems, 61: 135-152.
• Magurran, A.E. (1983). Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Springer –Science+Business Media, B.V. ISBN 978-94-015-7360-3. DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0.
• Palliwoda, J., Kowarik, I., von der Lippe, M. (2017). Human-biodiversity interactions in urban parks: The species level matters. Landscape and Urban Planning 157: 394–406. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.003
• Petr Petřík, P., Sádlo, J., Hejda, M., Štajerová, K., Pyšek, P., Pergl, J. (2019). Composition patterns of ornamental flora in the Czech Republic. NeoBiota 52: 87–109 (2019). doi: 10.3897/neobiota.52.39260. http://neobiota.pensoft.net
• Richards, N.A., Mallette, J.R., Simpson, R.J., Macie, E.A. (1984). Residential greenspace and vegetation in a mature city: Syracuse, New York. Urban Ecology 1984;8(1–2):99–125.
• Salako, V.K., Fandohan, B., Kassa, A.E., Assogbadjo, A.F.R., Idohou, R.C., Gbedomon, S., Chakeredza, M.E., Dulloo, R.G., Kaka, (2014), Home gardens: An assessment of their biodiversity and potential contribution to conservation of threatened species and crop wild relatives in Benin. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 61:313–330.
• SAS, (1990). SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. Version 5 Edition, SAS Institute Inc., Cary.
• Sever, R, Kopar, İ. (2019). Niğde İlinin Başlıca Coğrafi Özellikleri. www.nigdekulturturizm.gov.tr/Eklenti/9887,nigde-cografyadoc.doc?0 Accessed. 10.12.2020.
• Sukopp, H., Werner, P. (1983). Urban environments and vegetation. In: Holzner W, Werger MJA, Ikusima I, editors. Man’s impact on vegetation. The Hague: Dr. W. Junk Publishers; p. 247–60.
• Sukopp., H. (2004). Human-caused impact on preserved vegetation. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004;68(4):347–55.
• Sunwar, S, Thornstrom, C, Subedi A, Bystrom, M. (2006). ‘Home gardens in western Nepal: opportunities and challenges for on-farm management of agrobiodiversity’, Biodiversity and Conservation (15): 4211–38
• Surat, H., Yaman ,Y.K. (2017). Evaluation of plant species in home gardens: A case study of Batumi city (Adjara). Turkish Journal of Forestry. 18(1): 11-20.
• TÜİK, (2019). TÜİK, İstatistiklerle Türkiye, 2019.(www.tuik.gov.tr)