Comparison of the electromyography activity of selected leg-dominant lower limb muscles during stance phase of running on treadmill and overground

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1, 46 - 51, 30.04.2019

Amir Reza Sedıghı Mehrdad Anbarıan Mohammad Hossien Ghasemı

https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.467735

Cited By: 1

Öz

The
aim of present study was to compare electromyography activity of selected
leg-dominant lower limb muscles during stance phase of running on treadmill and
overground. Fourteen male students were selected as the available statistical
sample. The multivariate analysis of variance with repeated measures (MANOVA)
was used to compare the normalized RMS activation of selected lower limb
muscles between running surfaces in each of two phases: initial 50% and
terminal 50% of stance phase. The results of this study showed a significant
difference in total activity of selected lower limb muscles between the two
surfaces for initial 50% stance phase (P<0.05); so that while running on the
gym surface muscle activation level of rectus femoris, vastus medialis, vastus
lateralis, and biceps femoris was significantly higher than while running on
the treadmill surface (P<0.05). Although no significant difference in the
lower limb muscle activation level was observed for the terminal 50% of stance
phase between the two surfaces (P>0.05), while running on the gym muscle
activation level of rectus femoris, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, and
lateral gastrocnemius was significantly higher than while running on a
treadmill (P<0.05). According to these results, instrumented treadmills may
be possibly useful in the designation of specific training programs for injured
persons to reduce the activity level of lower extremity muscles. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Lower limb muscles, Electromyography, Treadmill

Kaynakça

• 1. Arnold BJW, Weeks BK, Horan SA. An examination of treadmill running in barefoot and shod conditions in healthy men. J Sport Sci. 2018; 11: 1-8.24. Rabiei M, Jafarnejhad-Gro T, Binabaji H, Hosseininejad E, Anbarian M. Assessment of postural response after sudden perturbation in subjects with genu valgum. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci 2012; 14(2): 90-100. (In Parsian)
• 3. Hunter I, Seeley MK, Hopkins JT, Carr C, Franson JJ. EMG activity during positive-pressure treadmill running. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2014; 24:348-52.
• 4. Swanson SC, Caldwell GE. An integrated biomechanical analysis of high speed incline and level treadmill running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32(6):1146-55.
• 5. García-Pérez JA, Pérez-Soriano P, Llana S, Martínez-Nova A, Sánchez-Zuriaga D. Effect of overground vs treadmill running on plantar pressure: Influence of fatigue. Gait Posture 2013; 38(4): 929-33.
• 6. Montgomery G, Abt G, Dobson C, Smith T, Ditroilo M. Tibial impacts and muscle activation during walking, jogging and running when performed overground, and on motorised and non-motorised treadmills. Gait Posture. 2016; 49:120-126
• 7. Lee SJ, Hidler J. Biomechanics of overground vs. treadmill walking in healthy individuals. J Appl Physiol 2008; 104: 747-55.
• 8. Wang L, Hong Y, Li JX. Muscular Activity of Lower Extremity Muscles Running on Treadmill Compared with Different Overground Surfaces. Am J Sports Sci Med 2014; 2(4): 161-5.
• 9. Rozumalski A, Novacheck TF, Griffith CJ, Walt K, Schwartz MH. Treadmill vs. overground running gait during childhood: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. Gait Posture 2015; 41(2): 613-8.
• 10. Radmehr G, Mazaheri R, Sanjari MA, Halabchi F, Mansournia MA. Comparison of activation pattern of selected trunk muscles during over ground and treadmill walking. J Mod Rehabil 2013; 6(4): 49-58 (In Persian).
• 11. Caekenberghe IV, Segers V, Aerts P, Willems P, De Clercq D. Joint kinematics and kinetics of overground accelerated running versus running on an accelerated treadmill. J R Soc Interface. 2013;10(84):20130222.
• 12. Arsenault AB, Winter DA, Marteniuk RG. Treadmill versus walkway locomotion in humans: an EMG study. Ergonomics 1986; 29(5): 665-76.
• 13. Chia LC, Licari MK, Guelfi KJ, Reid SL. Investigation of treadmill and overground running: implications for the measurement of oxygen cost in children with developmental coordination disorder. Gait Posture. 2014;40(3):464-70.
• 14. Parvataneni K, Ploeg L, Olney SJ, Brouwer B. Kinematic, kinetic and metabolic parameters of treadmill versus overground walking in healthy older adults. Clin Biomech, 2009; 24 95-100.
• 15. Watt JR, Franz JR, Jackson K, Dicharry J, Riley PO, Kerrigan DC. A three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy elderly subjects. Clin Biomech 2010; 25: 444-9.
• 16. Batlkham B, Oyunaa C, Odongua N. A Kinematic Comparison of Overground and Treadmill Walking. Value Health. 2014 Nov;17(7):A774.
• 17. Riley PO, Paolini G, Della Croce U, Paylo KW, Kerrigan DC. A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. Gait Posture 2007; 26: 17-24.
• 18. Dixon SJ, Collop AC, Batt ME. Surface effects on ground reaction forces and lower extremity kinematics in running. Med Sci Sports Exer 2000; 32(11): 1919-26.
• 19. Pinnington HC, Lloyd DG, Besier TF, Dawson B. Kinematic and electromyography analysis of submaximal differences running on a firm surface compared with soft, dry sand. Eur J Appl Physiol 2005; 94(3): 242-53.
• 20. Baur H, Hirschmüller A, Müller S, Gollhofer A, Mayer F. Muscular activity in treadmill and overground running. Isokin Exer Sci 2007; 15(2): 166-71.
• 21. Di Nardo F, Fioretti S. EMG-Based Analysis of Treadmill and Ground Walking in Distal Leg Muscles, in In XIII Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2013. 2014, January, Springer International Publishing. p. 611-4.
• 22. Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for sEMG sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2000; 10: 361-374.
• 23. Hoffman M, Schrader J, Applegate T, Koceja D. Unilateral postural control of the functionally dominant and nondominant extremities of healthy subjects. J Athl Train 1998; 33(4): 319-22.
• 24. Rabiei M, Jafarnejhad-Gro T, Binabaji H, Hosseininejad E, Anbarian M. Assessment of postural response after sudden perturbation in subjects with genu valgum. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci 2012; 14(2): 90-100. (In Parsian)
• 25. Back J, Son W, Lee J, Jo S, Yi J, Bikram Pandy S. EMG Analysis of Muscle Activity in Lower Limbs of Snowboarders. Inter J Bio-Sci Bio-Tech. 2013; 5(6): 21-32.